Generalized Logit Adjustment: Calibrating Fine-tuned Models by Removing Label Bias in Foundation Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.08106v3
• Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 03:55:39 GMT
• Title: Generalized Logit Adjustment: Calibrating Fine-tuned Models by Removing Label Bias in Foundation Models
• Authors: Beier Zhu, Kaihua Tang, Qianru Sun, Hanwang Zhang,
• Abstract summary: Foundation models like CLIP allow zero-shot transfer on various tasks without additional training data. Fine-tuning and ensembling are also commonly adopted to better fit the downstream tasks. However, we argue that prior work has overlooked the inherent biases in foundation models.
• Score: 75.9543301303586
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Foundation models like CLIP allow zero-shot transfer on various tasks without additional training data. Yet, the zero-shot performance is less competitive than a fully supervised one. Thus, to enhance the performance, fine-tuning and ensembling are also commonly adopted to better fit the downstream tasks. However, we argue that such prior work has overlooked the inherent biases in foundation models. Due to the highly imbalanced Web-scale training set, these foundation models are inevitably skewed toward frequent semantics, and thus the subsequent fine-tuning or ensembling is still biased. In this study, we systematically examine the biases in foundation models and demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed Generalized Logit Adjustment (GLA) method. Note that bias estimation in foundation models is challenging, as most pre-train data cannot be explicitly accessed like in traditional long-tailed classification tasks. To this end, GLA has an optimization-based bias estimation approach for debiasing foundation models. As our work resolves a fundamental flaw in the pre-training, the proposed GLA demonstrates significant improvements across a diverse range of tasks: it achieves 1.5 pp accuracy gains on ImageNet, an large average improvement (1.4-4.6 pp) on 11 few-shot datasets, 2.4 pp gains on long-tailed classification. Codes are in \url{https://github.com/BeierZhu/GLA}.

Related papers

• Federated Class-Incremental Learning with Hierarchical Generative Prototypes [10.532838477096055]
  Federated Learning (FL) aims at unburdening the training of deep models by distributing computation across multiple devices (clients) Our proposal constrains both biases in the last layer by efficiently finetuning a pre-trained backbone using learnable prompts. Our method significantly improves the current State Of The Art, providing an average increase of +7.8% in accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T16:12:27Z)
• Sparse is Enough in Fine-tuning Pre-trained Large Language Models [98.46493578509039]
  We propose a gradient-based sparse fine-tuning algorithm, named Sparse Increment Fine-Tuning (SIFT) We validate its effectiveness on a range of tasks including the GLUE Benchmark and Instruction-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-19T06:06:30Z)
• FD-Align: Feature Discrimination Alignment for Fine-tuning Pre-Trained Models in Few-Shot Learning [21.693779973263172]
  In this paper, we introduce a fine-tuning approach termed Feature Discrimination Alignment (FD-Align) Our method aims to bolster the model's generalizability by preserving the consistency of spurious features. Once fine-tuned, the model can seamlessly integrate with existing methods, leading to performance improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T17:12:01Z)
• Distributionally Robust Post-hoc Classifiers under Prior Shifts [31.237674771958165]
  We investigate the problem of training models that are robust to shifts caused by changes in the distribution of class-priors or group-priors. We present an extremely lightweight post-hoc approach that performs scaling adjustments to predictions from a pre-trained model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-16T00:54:57Z)
• DR-Tune: Improving Fine-tuning of Pretrained Visual Models by Distribution Regularization with Semantic Calibration [38.4461170690033]
  We propose a novel fine-tuning framework, namely distribution regularization with semantic calibration (DR-Tune) DR-Tune employs distribution regularization by enforcing the downstream task head to decrease its classification error on the pretrained feature distribution. To alleviate the interference by semantic drift, we develop the semantic calibration (SC) module.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T10:59:20Z)
• RanPAC: Random Projections and Pre-trained Models for Continual Learning [59.07316955610658]
  Continual learning (CL) aims to learn different tasks (such as classification) in a non-stationary data stream without forgetting old ones. We propose a concise and effective approach for CL with pre-trained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-05T12:49:02Z)
• Universal Domain Adaptation from Foundation Models: A Baseline Study [58.51162198585434]
  We make empirical studies of state-of-the-art UniDA methods using foundation models. We introduce textitCLIP distillation, a parameter-free method specifically designed to distill target knowledge from CLIP models. Although simple, our method outperforms previous approaches in most benchmark tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T16:28:29Z)
• TWINS: A Fine-Tuning Framework for Improved Transferability of Adversarial Robustness and Generalization [89.54947228958494]
  This paper focuses on the fine-tuning of an adversarially pre-trained model in various classification tasks. We propose a novel statistics-based approach, Two-WIng NormliSation (TWINS) fine-tuning framework. TWINS is shown to be effective on a wide range of image classification datasets in terms of both generalization and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T14:12:55Z)
• General Greedy De-bias Learning [163.65789778416172]
  We propose a General Greedy De-bias learning framework (GGD), which greedily trains the biased models and the base model like gradient descent in functional space. GGD can learn a more robust base model under the settings of both task-specific biased models with prior knowledge and self-ensemble biased model without prior knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T14:47:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.