Understanding How to Inform Blind and Low-Vision Users about Data Privacy through Privacy Question Answering Assistants

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.08687v1
• Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 19:51:31 GMT
• Title: Understanding How to Inform Blind and Low-Vision Users about Data Privacy through Privacy Question Answering Assistants
• Authors: Yuanyuan Feng, Abhilasha Ravichander, Yaxing Yao, Shikun Zhang, Rex Chen, Shomir Wilson, Norman Sadeh,
• Abstract summary: Blind and low-vision (BLV) users face heightened security and privacy risks, but their risk mitigation is often insufficient. Our study sheds light on BLV users' expectations when it comes to usability, accessibility, trust and equity issues regarding digital data privacy.
• Score: 23.94659412932831
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Understanding and managing data privacy in the digital world can be challenging for sighted users, let alone blind and low-vision (BLV) users. There is limited research on how BLV users, who have special accessibility needs, navigate data privacy, and how potential privacy tools could assist them. We conducted an in-depth qualitative study with 21 US BLV participants to understand their data privacy risk perception and mitigation, as well as their information behaviors related to data privacy. We also explored BLV users' attitudes towards potential privacy question answering (Q&A) assistants that enable them to better navigate data privacy information. We found that BLV users face heightened security and privacy risks, but their risk mitigation is often insufficient. They do not necessarily seek data privacy information but clearly recognize the benefits of a potential privacy Q&A assistant. They also expect privacy Q&A assistants to possess cross-platform compatibility, support multi-modality, and demonstrate robust functionality. Our study sheds light on BLV users' expectations when it comes to usability, accessibility, trust and equity issues regarding digital data privacy.

Related papers

• Collection, usage and privacy of mobility data in the enterprise and public administrations [55.2480439325792]
  Security measures such as anonymization are needed to protect individuals' privacy. Within our study, we conducted expert interviews to gain insights into practices in the field. We survey privacy-enhancing methods in use, which generally do not comply with state-of-the-art standards of differential privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T08:29:27Z)
• Human-Centered Privacy Research in the Age of Large Language Models [31.379232599019915]
  This SIG aims to bring together researchers with backgrounds in usable security and privacy, human-AI collaboration, NLP, or any other related domains to share their perspectives and experiences on this problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-03T02:32:45Z)
• Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theory [82.7042006247124]
  We show that even the most capable AI models reveal private information in contexts that humans would not, 39% and 57% of the time, respectively. Our work underscores the immediate need to explore novel inference-time privacy-preserving approaches, based on reasoning and theory of mind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T04:15:30Z)
• Protecting User Privacy in Online Settings via Supervised Learning [69.38374877559423]
  We design an intelligent approach to online privacy protection that leverages supervised learning. By detecting and blocking data collection that might infringe on a user's privacy, we can restore a degree of digital privacy to the user.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T05:20:16Z)
• How Do Input Attributes Impact the Privacy Loss in Differential Privacy? [55.492422758737575]
  We study the connection between the per-subject norm in DP neural networks and individual privacy loss. We introduce a novel metric termed the Privacy Loss-Input Susceptibility (PLIS) which allows one to apportion the subject's privacy loss to their input attributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-18T11:39:03Z)
• Privacy Explanations - A Means to End-User Trust [64.7066037969487]
  We looked into how explainability might help to tackle this problem. We created privacy explanations that aim to help to clarify to end users why and for what purposes specific data is required. Our findings reveal that privacy explanations can be an important step towards increasing trust in software systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-18T09:30:37Z)
• A Self-aware Personal Assistant for Making Personalized Privacy Decisions [3.988307519677766]
  This paper proposes a personal assistant that uses deep learning to classify content based on its privacy label. By factoring in the user's own understanding of privacy, such as risk factors or own labels, the personal assistant can personalize its recommendations per user.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-13T10:15:04Z)
• "I need a better description'': An Investigation Into User Expectations For Differential Privacy [31.352325485393074]
  We explore users' privacy expectations related to differential privacy. We find that users care about the kinds of information leaks against which differential privacy protects. We find that the ways in which differential privacy is described in-the-wild haphazardly set users' privacy expectations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T02:36:37Z)
• The Challenges and Impact of Privacy Policy Comprehension [0.0]
  This paper experimentally manipulated the privacy-friendliness of an unavoidable and simple privacy policy. Half of our participants miscomprehended even this transparent privacy policy. To mitigate such pitfalls we present design recommendations to improve the quality of informed consent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-18T14:16:48Z)
• A vision for global privacy bridges: Technical and legal measures for international data markets [77.34726150561087]
  Despite data protection laws and an acknowledged right to privacy, trading personal information has become a business equated with "trading oil" An open conflict is arising between business demands for data and a desire for privacy. We propose and test a vision of a personal information market with privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-13T13:55:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.