Text Summarization Using Large Language Models: A Comparative Study of MPT-7b-instruct, Falcon-7b-instruct, and OpenAI Chat-GPT Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.10449v2
• Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 19:54:16 GMT
• Title: Text Summarization Using Large Language Models: A Comparative Study of MPT-7b-instruct, Falcon-7b-instruct, and OpenAI Chat-GPT Models
• Authors: Lochan Basyal and Mihir Sanghvi
• Abstract summary: Leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) has shown remarkable promise in enhancing summarization techniques. This paper embarks on an exploration of text summarization with a diverse set of LLMs, including MPT-7b-instruct, falcon-7b-instruct, and OpenAI ChatGPT text-davinci-003 models.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Text summarization is a critical Natural Language Processing (NLP) task with applications ranging from information retrieval to content generation. Leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) has shown remarkable promise in enhancing summarization techniques. This paper embarks on an exploration of text summarization with a diverse set of LLMs, including MPT-7b-instruct, falcon-7b-instruct, and OpenAI ChatGPT text-davinci-003 models. The experiment was performed with different hyperparameters and evaluated the generated summaries using widely accepted metrics such as the Bilingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU) Score, Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation (ROUGE) Score, and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) Score. According to the experiment, text-davinci-003 outperformed the others. This investigation involved two distinct datasets: CNN Daily Mail and XSum. Its primary objective was to provide a comprehensive understanding of the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) when applied to different datasets. The assessment of these models' effectiveness contributes valuable insights to researchers and practitioners within the NLP domain. This work serves as a resource for those interested in harnessing the potential of LLMs for text summarization and lays the foundation for the development of advanced Generative AI applications aimed at addressing a wide spectrum of business challenges.

Related papers

• Evaluating LLM Prompts for Data Augmentation in Multi-label Classification of Ecological Texts [1.565361244756411]
  Large language models (LLMs) play a crucial role in natural language processing (NLP) tasks. This study applied prompt-based data augmentation to detect mentions of green practices in Russian social media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-22T12:37:41Z)
• P-MMEval: A Parallel Multilingual Multitask Benchmark for Consistent Evaluation of LLMs [84.24644520272835]
  Large language models (LLMs) showcase varied multilingual capabilities across tasks like translation, code generation, and reasoning. Previous assessments often limited their scope to fundamental natural language processing (NLP) or isolated capability-specific tasks. We present a pipeline for selecting available and reasonable benchmarks from massive ones, addressing the oversight in previous work regarding the utility of these benchmarks. We introduce P-MMEval, a large-scale benchmark covering effective fundamental and capability-specialized datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-14T01:29:36Z)
• Towards Enhancing Coherence in Extractive Summarization: Dataset and Experiments with LLMs [70.15262704746378]
  We propose a systematically created human-annotated dataset consisting of coherent summaries for five publicly available datasets and natural language user feedback. Preliminary experiments with Falcon-40B and Llama-2-13B show significant performance improvements (10% Rouge-L) in terms of producing coherent summaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-05T20:25:04Z)
• Using Large Language Models to Enrich the Documentation of Datasets for Machine Learning [1.8270184406083445]
  We explore using large language models (LLM) and prompting strategies to automatically extract dimensions from documents. Our approach could aid data publishers and practitioners in creating machine-readable documentation. We have released an open-source tool implementing our approach and a replication package, including the experiments' code and results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T10:09:28Z)
• Comparative Study of Domain Driven Terms Extraction Using Large Language Models [0.0]
  Keywords play a crucial role in bridging the gap between human understanding and machine processing of textual data. This review focuses on keyword extraction methods, emphasizing the use of three major Large Language Models (LLMs): Llama2-7B, GPT-3.5, and Falcon-7B.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T22:04:51Z)
• Exploring Precision and Recall to assess the quality and diversity of LLMs [82.21278402856079]
  We introduce a novel evaluation framework for Large Language Models (LLMs) such as textscLlama-2 and textscMistral. This approach allows for a nuanced assessment of the quality and diversity of generated text without the need for aligned corpora.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T13:53:26Z)
• GIELLM: Japanese General Information Extraction Large Language Model Utilizing Mutual Reinforcement Effect [0.0]
  We introduce the General Information Extraction Large Language Model (GIELLM) It integrates text Classification, Sentiment Analysis, Named Entity Recognition, Relation Extraction, and Event Extraction using a uniform input-output schema. This innovation marks the first instance of a model simultaneously handling such a diverse array of IE subtasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-12T13:30:38Z)
• Large Language Models are Diverse Role-Players for Summarization Evaluation [82.31575622685902]
  A document summary's quality can be assessed by human annotators on various criteria, both objective ones like grammar and correctness, and subjective ones like informativeness, succinctness, and appeal. Most of the automatic evaluation methods like BLUE/ROUGE may be not able to adequately capture the above dimensions. We propose a new evaluation framework based on LLMs, which provides a comprehensive evaluation framework by comparing generated text and reference text from both objective and subjective aspects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-27T10:40:59Z)
• Large Language Models Are Latent Variable Models: Explaining and Finding Good Demonstrations for In-Context Learning [104.58874584354787]
  In recent years, pre-trained large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable efficiency in achieving an inference-time few-shot learning capability known as in-context learning. This study aims to examine the in-context learning phenomenon through a Bayesian lens, viewing real-world LLMs as latent variable models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-27T18:59:01Z)
• Ensemble Transfer Learning for Multilingual Coreference Resolution [60.409789753164944]
  A problem that frequently occurs when working with a non-English language is the scarcity of annotated training data. We design a simple but effective ensemble-based framework that combines various transfer learning techniques. We also propose a low-cost TL method that bootstraps coreference resolution models by utilizing Wikipedia anchor texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-22T18:22:55Z)
• Understanding BLOOM: An empirical study on diverse NLP tasks [3.884530687475798]
  We present an evaluation of smaller BLOOM model variants on various natural language processing tasks. BLOOM variants under-perform on all GLUE tasks (except WNLI), question-answering, and text generation. The variants bloom for WNLI, with an accuracy of 56.3%, and for prompt-based few-shot text extraction on MIT Movies and ATIS datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-27T15:48:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.