Evidence of interrelated cognitive-like capabilities in large language models: Indications of artificial general intelligence or achievement?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.11616v3
• Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 18:17:06 GMT
• Title: Evidence of interrelated cognitive-like capabilities in large language models: Indications of artificial general intelligence or achievement?
• Authors: David Ilić, Gilles E. Gignac,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) are advanced artificial intelligence (AI) systems that can perform a variety of tasks commonly found in human intelligence tests. We investigated whether test scores may also exhibit positive intercorrelations. We found strong empirical evidence for a positive manifold and a general factor of ability.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are advanced artificial intelligence (AI) systems that can perform a variety of tasks commonly found in human intelligence tests, such as defining words, performing calculations, and engaging in verbal reasoning. There are also substantial individual differences in LLM capacities. Given the consistent observation of a positive manifold and general intelligence factor in human samples, along with group-level factors (e.g., crystallized intelligence), we hypothesized that LLM test scores may also exhibit positive intercorrelations, which could potentially give rise to an artificial general ability (AGA) factor and one or more group-level factors. Based on a sample of 591 LLMs and scores from 12 tests aligned with fluid reasoning (Gf), domain-specific knowledge (Gkn), reading/writing (Grw), and quantitative knowledge (Gq), we found strong empirical evidence for a positive manifold and a general factor of ability. Additionally, we identified a combined Gkn/Grw group-level factor. Finally, the number of LLM parameters correlated positively with both general factor of ability and Gkn/Grw factor scores, although the effects showed diminishing returns. We interpreted our results to suggest that LLMs, like human cognitive abilities, may share a common underlying efficiency in processing information and solving problems, though whether LLMs manifest primarily achievement/expertise rather than intelligence remains to be determined. Finally, while models with greater numbers of parameters exhibit greater general cognitive-like abilities, akin to the connection between greater neuronal density and human general intelligence, other characteristics must also be involved.

Related papers

• Can the capability of Large Language Models be described by human ability? A Meta Study [10.516198272048488]
  We collected performance data from over 80 models across 37 evaluation benchmarks. We have confirmed that certain capabilities of LLMs with fewer than 10 billion parameters can indeed be described. While some abilities are considered interrelated in humans, they appear nearly uncorrelated in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-13T08:34:11Z)
• How Deep is Love in LLMs' Hearts? Exploring Semantic Size in Human-like Cognition [75.11808682808065]
  This study investigates whether large language models (LLMs) exhibit similar tendencies in understanding semantic size. Our findings reveal that multi-modal training is crucial for LLMs to achieve more human-like understanding. Lastly, we examine whether LLMs are influenced by attention-grabbing headlines with larger semantic sizes in a real-world web shopping scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-01T03:35:56Z)
• An Overview of Large Language Models for Statisticians [109.38601458831545]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as transformative tools in artificial intelligence (AI) This paper explores potential areas where statisticians can make important contributions to the development of LLMs. We focus on issues such as uncertainty quantification, interpretability, fairness, privacy, watermarking and model adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T03:40:36Z)
• Judgment of Learning: A Human Ability Beyond Generative Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) increasingly mimic human cognition in various language-based tasks. We introduce a cross-agent prediction model to assess whether ChatGPT-based LLMs align with human judgments of learning (JOL) Our results revealed that while human JOL reliably predicted actual memory performance, none of the tested LLMs demonstrated comparable predictive accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T09:42:30Z)
• Neuron-based Personality Trait Induction in Large Language Models [115.08894603023712]
  Large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly proficient at simulating various personality traits. We present a neuron-based approach for personality trait induction in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T07:47:45Z)
• CogLM: Tracking Cognitive Development of Large Language Models [20.138831477848615]
  We construct a benchmark CogLM based on Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development. CogLM comprises 1,220 questions spanning 10 cognitive abilities crafted by more than 20 human experts. We find that human-like cognitive abilities have emerged in advanced LLMs (GPT-4), comparable to those of a 20-year-old human.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-17T09:49:40Z)
• From Pre-training Corpora to Large Language Models: What Factors Influence LLM Performance in Causal Discovery Tasks? [51.42906577386907]
  This study explores the factors influencing the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in causal discovery tasks. A higher frequency of causal mentions correlates with better model performance, suggesting that extensive exposure to causal information during training enhances the models' causal discovery capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-29T01:45:05Z)
• Can Language Models Recognize Convincing Arguments? [12.458437450959416]
  Large language models (LLMs) have raised concerns about their potential to create and propagate convincing narratives. We study their performance in detecting convincing arguments to gain insights into their persuasive capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-31T17:38:33Z)
• Comparing Rationality Between Large Language Models and Humans: Insights and Open Questions [6.201550639431176]
  This paper focuses on the burgeoning prominence of large language models (LLMs) We underscore the pivotal role of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) in augmenting LLMs' rationality and decision-making prowess.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T18:36:04Z)
• Discovery of the Hidden World with Large Language Models [95.58823685009727]
  This paper presents Causal representatiOn AssistanT (COAT) that introduces large language models (LLMs) to bridge the gap. LLMs are trained on massive observations of the world and have demonstrated great capability in extracting key information from unstructured data. COAT also adopts CDs to find causal relations among the identified variables as well as to provide feedback to LLMs to iteratively refine the proposed factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T12:18:54Z)
• MAgIC: Investigation of Large Language Model Powered Multi-Agent in Cognition, Adaptability, Rationality and Collaboration [102.41118020705876]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have marked a significant advancement in the field of natural language processing. As their applications extend into multi-agent environments, a need has arisen for a comprehensive evaluation framework. This work introduces a novel benchmarking framework specifically tailored to assess LLMs within multi-agent settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T21:46:27Z)
• Unveiling A Core Linguistic Region in Large Language Models [49.860260050718516]
  This paper conducts an analogical research using brain localization as a prototype. We have discovered a core region in large language models that corresponds to linguistic competence. We observe that an improvement in linguistic competence does not necessarily accompany an elevation in the model's knowledge level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T13:31:32Z)
• Emotional Intelligence of Large Language Models [9.834823298632374]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable abilities across numerous disciplines. However, their alignment with human emotions and values, which is critical for real-world applications, has not been systematically evaluated. Here, we assessed LLMs' Emotional Intelligence (EI), encompassing emotion recognition, interpretation, and understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-18T07:49:38Z)
• Clever Hans or Neural Theory of Mind? Stress Testing Social Reasoning in Large Language Models [82.50173296858377]
  Many anecdotal examples were used to suggest newer large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and GPT-4 exhibit Neural Theory-of-Mind (N-ToM) We investigate the extent of LLMs' N-ToM through an extensive evaluation on 6 tasks and find that while LLMs exhibit certain N-ToM abilities, this behavior is far from being robust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T06:14:31Z)
• Human Behavioral Benchmarking: Numeric Magnitude Comparison Effects in Large Language Models [4.412336603162406]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) do not differentially represent numbers, which are pervasive in text. In this work, we investigate how well popular LLMs capture the magnitudes of numbers from a behavioral lens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T07:50:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.