Generating Prototypes for Contradiction Detection Using Large Language Models and Linguistic Rules

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.14732v1
• Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 09:07:27 GMT
• Title: Generating Prototypes for Contradiction Detection Using Large Language Models and Linguistic Rules
• Authors: Maren Pielka, Svetlana Schmidt, Rafet Sifa
• Abstract summary: We introduce a novel data generation method for contradiction detection. We instruct the generative models to create contradicting statements with respect to descriptions of specific contradiction types. As an auxiliary approach, we use linguistic rules to construct simple contradictions.
• Score: 1.6497679785422956
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We introduce a novel data generation method for contradiction detection, which leverages the generative power of large language models as well as linguistic rules. Our vision is to provide a condensed corpus of prototypical contradictions, allowing for in-depth linguistic analysis as well as efficient language model fine-tuning. To this end, we instruct the generative models to create contradicting statements with respect to descriptions of specific contradiction types. In addition, the model is also instructed to come up with completely new contradiction typologies. As an auxiliary approach, we use linguistic rules to construct simple contradictions such as those arising from negation, antonymy and numeric mismatch. We find that our methods yield promising results in terms of coherence and variety of the data. Further studies, as well as manual refinement are necessary to make use of this data in a machine learning setup.

Related papers

• Learning Phonotactics from Linguistic Informants [54.086544221761486]
  Our model iteratively selects or synthesizes a data-point according to one of a range of information-theoretic policies. We find that the information-theoretic policies that our model uses to select items to query the informant achieve sample efficiency comparable to, or greater than, fully supervised approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T00:18:56Z)
• A Generative Adversarial Attack for Multilingual Text Classifiers [10.993289209465129]
  We propose an approach to fine-tune a multilingual paraphrase model with an adversarial objective. The training objective incorporates a set of pre-trained models to ensure text quality and language consistency. The experimental validation over two multilingual datasets and five languages has shown the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T10:14:27Z)
• Beyond Contrastive Learning: A Variational Generative Model for Multilingual Retrieval [109.62363167257664]
  We propose a generative model for learning multilingual text embeddings. Our model operates on parallel data in $N$ languages. We evaluate this method on a suite of tasks including semantic similarity, bitext mining, and cross-lingual question retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-21T02:41:40Z)
• Interpreting Language Models with Contrastive Explanations [99.7035899290924]
  Language models must consider various features to predict a token, such as its part of speech, number, tense, or semantics. Existing explanation methods conflate evidence for all these features into a single explanation, which is less interpretable for human understanding. We show that contrastive explanations are quantifiably better than non-contrastive explanations in verifying major grammatical phenomena.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-21T18:32:24Z)
• I like fish, especially dolphins: Addressing Contradictions in Dialogue Modeling [104.09033240889106]
  We introduce the DialoguE COntradiction DEtection task (DECODE) and a new conversational dataset containing both human-human and human-bot contradictory dialogues. We then compare a structured utterance-based approach of using pre-trained Transformer models for contradiction detection with the typical unstructured approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-24T18:47:49Z)
• Detecting Word Sense Disambiguation Biases in Machine Translation for Model-Agnostic Adversarial Attacks [84.61578555312288]
  We introduce a method for the prediction of disambiguation errors based on statistical data properties. We develop a simple adversarial attack strategy that minimally perturbs sentences in order to elicit disambiguation errors. Our findings indicate that disambiguation robustness varies substantially between domains and that different models trained on the same data are vulnerable to different attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-03T17:01:44Z)
• Recurrent Neural Network Language Models Always Learn English-Like Relative Clause Attachment [17.995905582226463]
  We compare model performance in English and Spanish to show that non-linguistic biases in RNN LMs advantageously overlap with syntactic structure in English but not Spanish. English models may appear to acquire human-like syntactic preferences, while models trained on Spanish fail to acquire comparable human-like preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T01:21:47Z)
• Limits of Detecting Text Generated by Large-Scale Language Models [65.46403462928319]
  Some consider large-scale language models that can generate long and coherent pieces of text as dangerous, since they may be used in misinformation campaigns. Here we formulate large-scale language model output detection as a hypothesis testing problem to classify text as genuine or generated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-09T19:53:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.