Unnatural language processing: How do language models handle machine-generated prompts?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.15829v1
• Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 13:32:20 GMT
• Title: Unnatural language processing: How do language models handle machine-generated prompts?
• Authors: Corentin Kervadec, Francesca Franzon and Marco Baroni
• Abstract summary: We use machine-generated prompts to probe how models respond to input that is not composed of natural language expressions. We study the behavior of models of different sizes in multiple semantic tasks in response to both continuous and discrete machine-generated prompts.
• Score: 12.00724154801388
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Language model prompt optimization research has shown that semantically and grammatically well-formed manually crafted prompts are routinely outperformed by automatically generated token sequences with no apparent meaning or syntactic structure, including sequences of vectors from a model's embedding space. We use machine-generated prompts to probe how models respond to input that is not composed of natural language expressions. We study the behavior of models of different sizes in multiple semantic tasks in response to both continuous and discrete machine-generated prompts, and compare it to the behavior in response to human-generated natural-language prompts. Even when producing a similar output, machine-generated and human prompts trigger different response patterns through the network processing pathways, including different perplexities, different attention and output entropy distributions, and different unit activation profiles. We provide preliminary insight into the nature of the units activated by different prompt types, suggesting that only natural language prompts recruit a genuinely linguistic circuit.

Related papers

• A Variational Framework for Improving Naturalness in Generative Spoken Language Models [52.673912922590866]
  We propose an end-to-end variational approach that automatically learns to encode continuous speech attributes to enhance semantic tokens.<n>Our approach eliminates the need for manual extraction and selection of paralinguistic features.<n>It produces preferred speech continuations according to human raters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T17:58:17Z)
• Demystifying optimized prompts in language models [1.515687944002438]
  We investigate the composition of optimized prompts, as well as the mechanisms by which LMs parse and build predictions from optimized prompts.<n>We find that optimized prompts primarily consist of punctuation and noun tokens which are more rare in the training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-04T22:04:14Z)
• Can discrete information extraction prompts generalize across language models? [36.85568212975316]
  We study whether automatically-induced prompts can also be used, out-of-the-box, to probe other language models for the same information. We introduce a way to induce prompts by mixing language models at training time that results in prompts that generalize well across models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-20T09:56:51Z)
• Language Model-Based Paired Variational Autoencoders for Robotic Language Learning [18.851256771007748]
  Similar to human infants, artificial agents can learn language while interacting with their environment. We present a neural model that bidirectionally binds robot actions and their language descriptions in a simple object manipulation scenario. Next, we introduce PVAE-BERT, which equips the model with a pretrained large-scale language model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-17T10:05:26Z)
• Examining the Inductive Bias of Neural Language Models with Artificial Languages [42.699545862522214]
  We propose a novel method for investigating the inductive biases of language models using artificial languages. This constitutes a fully controlled causal framework, and demonstrates how grammar engineering can serve as a useful tool for analyzing neural models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-02T09:34:32Z)
• Constrained Language Models Yield Few-Shot Semantic Parsers [73.50960967598654]
  We explore the use of large pretrained language models as few-shot semantics. The goal in semantic parsing is to generate a structured meaning representation given a natural language input. We use language models to paraphrase inputs into a controlled sublanguage resembling English that can be automatically mapped to a target meaning representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-18T08:13:06Z)
• Evaluating the Morphosyntactic Well-formedness of Generated Texts [88.20502652494521]
  We propose L'AMBRE -- a metric to evaluate the morphosyntactic well-formedness of text. We show the effectiveness of our metric on the task of machine translation through a diachronic study of systems translating into morphologically-rich languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-30T18:02:58Z)
• Unnatural Language Inference [48.45003475966808]
  We find that state-of-the-art NLI models, such as RoBERTa and BART, are invariant to, and sometimes even perform better on, examples with randomly reordered words. Our findings call into question the idea that our natural language understanding models, and the tasks used for measuring their progress, genuinely require a human-like understanding of syntax.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-30T20:40:48Z)
• Infusing Finetuning with Semantic Dependencies [62.37697048781823]
  We show that, unlike syntax, semantics is not brought to the surface by today's pretrained models. We then use convolutional graph encoders to explicitly incorporate semantic parses into task-specific finetuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T01:27:24Z)
• The Turking Test: Can Language Models Understand Instructions? [45.266428794559495]
  We present the Turking Test, which examines a model's ability to follow natural language instructions of varying complexity. Despite our lenient evaluation methodology, we observe that a large pretrained language model performs poorly across all tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T18:44:16Z)
• Mechanisms for Handling Nested Dependencies in Neural-Network Language Models and Humans [75.15855405318855]
  We studied whether a modern artificial neural network trained with "deep learning" methods mimics a central aspect of human sentence processing. Although the network was solely trained to predict the next word in a large corpus, analysis showed the emergence of specialized units that successfully handled local and long-distance syntactic agreement. We tested the model's predictions in a behavioral experiment where humans detected violations in number agreement in sentences with systematic variations in the singular/plural status of multiple nouns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-19T12:00:05Z)
• UniLMv2: Pseudo-Masked Language Models for Unified Language Model Pre-Training [152.63467944568094]
  We propose to pre-train a unified language model for both autoencoding and partially autoregressive language modeling tasks. Our experiments show that the unified language models pre-trained using PMLM achieve new state-of-the-art results on a wide range of natural language understanding and generation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-28T15:28:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.