An Integrative Survey on Mental Health Conversational Agents to Bridge
Computer Science and Medical Perspectives
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.17017v1
- Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 21:37:57 GMT
- Title: An Integrative Survey on Mental Health Conversational Agents to Bridge
Computer Science and Medical Perspectives
- Authors: Young Min Cho, Sunny Rai, Lyle Ungar, Jo\~ao Sedoc, Sharath Chandra
Guntuku
- Abstract summary: We conduct a comprehensive literature review using the PRISMA framework, reviewing 534 papers published in both computer science and medicine.
Our systematic review reveals 136 key papers on building mental health-related conversational agents with diverse characteristics of modeling and experimental design techniques.
- Score: 7.564560899044939
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Mental health conversational agents (a.k.a. chatbots) are widely studied for
their potential to offer accessible support to those experiencing mental health
challenges. Previous surveys on the topic primarily consider papers published
in either computer science or medicine, leading to a divide in understanding
and hindering the sharing of beneficial knowledge between both domains. To
bridge this gap, we conduct a comprehensive literature review using the PRISMA
framework, reviewing 534 papers published in both computer science and
medicine. Our systematic review reveals 136 key papers on building mental
health-related conversational agents with diverse characteristics of modeling
and experimental design techniques. We find that computer science papers focus
on LLM techniques and evaluating response quality using automated metrics with
little attention to the application while medical papers use rule-based
conversational agents and outcome metrics to measure the health outcomes of
participants. Based on our findings on transparency, ethics, and cultural
heterogeneity in this review, we provide a few recommendations to help bridge
the disciplinary divide and enable the cross-disciplinary development of mental
health conversational agents.
Related papers
- Measuring the Mental Health of Content Reviewers, a Systematic Review [50.06646946044604]
Many workers report long-term, potentially irreversible psychological harm.
This work is similar to activities that cause psychological harm to other kinds of helping professionals even after small doses of exposure.
This systematic review summarizes psychological measures from other professions and relates them to the experiences of content reviewers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-01T00:50:15Z) - Are LLMs effective psychological assessors? Leveraging adaptive RAG for interpretable mental health screening through psychometric practice [2.9775344067885974]
We propose a novel adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) approach that completes psychological questionnaires by analyzing social media posts.
Our method retrieves the most relevant user posts for each question in a psychological survey and uses Large Language Models (LLMs) to predict questionnaire scores in a zero-shot setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-02T00:01:54Z) - Understanding Student Sentiment on Mental Health Support in Colleges Using Large Language Models [5.3204794327005205]
This paper uses public Student Voice Survey data to analyze student sentiments on mental health support with large language models (LLMs)
The investigation of both traditional machine learning methods and state-of-the-art LLMs showed the best performance of GPT-3.5 and BERT on this new dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-18T02:53:15Z) - Open Challenges on Fairness of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging Applications [3.8236840661885485]
The chapter first discusses various sources of bias, including data collection, model training, and clinical deployment.
We then turn to discussing open challenges that we believe require attention from researchers and practitioners.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-24T02:41:19Z) - Explainable AI for Mental Disorder Detection via Social Media: A survey and outlook [0.7689629183085726]
We conduct a thorough survey to explore the intersection of data science, artificial intelligence, and mental healthcare.
A significant portion of the population actively engages in online social media platforms, creating a vast repository of personal data.
The paper navigates through traditional diagnostic methods, state-of-the-art data- and AI-driven research studies, and the emergence of explainable AI (XAI) models for mental healthcare.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-10T02:51:16Z) - LLM Questionnaire Completion for Automatic Psychiatric Assessment [49.1574468325115]
We employ a Large Language Model (LLM) to convert unstructured psychological interviews into structured questionnaires spanning various psychiatric and personality domains.
The obtained answers are coded as features, which are used to predict standardized psychiatric measures of depression (PHQ-8) and PTSD (PCL-C)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-09T09:03:11Z) - Mental health of computing professionals and students: A systematic literature review [2.532202013576547]
We evaluate the state-of-the-art of research in mental health and well-being interventions, assessments, and concerns like anxiety and depression in computer science and computing education.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-06T12:31:34Z) - MedKP: Medical Dialogue with Knowledge Enhancement and Clinical Pathway
Encoding [48.348511646407026]
We introduce the Medical dialogue with Knowledge enhancement and clinical Pathway encoding framework.
The framework integrates an external knowledge enhancement module through a medical knowledge graph and an internal clinical pathway encoding via medical entities and physician actions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-11T10:57:45Z) - A Benchmark for Automatic Medical Consultation System: Frameworks, Tasks
and Datasets [70.32630628211803]
We propose two frameworks to support automatic medical consultation, namely doctor-patient dialogue understanding and task-oriented interaction.
A new large medical dialogue dataset with multi-level fine-grained annotations is introduced.
We report a set of benchmark results for each task, which shows the usability of the dataset and sets a baseline for future studies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-19T16:43:21Z) - MedDG: An Entity-Centric Medical Consultation Dataset for Entity-Aware
Medical Dialogue Generation [86.38736781043109]
We build and release a large-scale high-quality Medical Dialogue dataset related to 12 types of common Gastrointestinal diseases named MedDG.
We propose two kinds of medical dialogue tasks based on MedDG dataset. One is the next entity prediction and the other is the doctor response generation.
Experimental results show that the pre-train language models and other baselines struggle on both tasks with poor performance in our dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-15T03:34:33Z) - Assessing the Severity of Health States based on Social Media Posts [62.52087340582502]
We propose a multiview learning framework that models both the textual content as well as contextual-information to assess the severity of the user's health state.
The diverse NLU views demonstrate its effectiveness on both the tasks and as well as on the individual disease to assess a user's health.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-21T03:45:14Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.