Medical Reasoning in the Era of LLMs: A Systematic Review of Enhancement Techniques and Applications

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.00669v1
• Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2025 14:41:31 GMT
• Title: Medical Reasoning in the Era of LLMs: A Systematic Review of Enhancement Techniques and Applications
• Authors: Wenxuan Wang, Zizhan Ma, Meidan Ding, Shiyi Zheng, Shengyuan Liu, Jie Liu, Jiaming Ji, Wenting Chen, Xiang Li, Linlin Shen, Yixuan Yuan,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) in medicine have enabled impressive capabilities, yet a critical gap remains in their ability to perform systematic, transparent, and verifiable reasoning.<n>This paper provides the first systematic review of this emerging field.<n>We propose a taxonomy of reasoning enhancement techniques, categorized into training-time strategies and test-time mechanisms.
• Score: 59.721265428780946
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The proliferation of Large Language Models (LLMs) in medicine has enabled impressive capabilities, yet a critical gap remains in their ability to perform systematic, transparent, and verifiable reasoning, a cornerstone of clinical practice. This has catalyzed a shift from single-step answer generation to the development of LLMs explicitly designed for medical reasoning. This paper provides the first systematic review of this emerging field. We propose a taxonomy of reasoning enhancement techniques, categorized into training-time strategies (e.g., supervised fine-tuning, reinforcement learning) and test-time mechanisms (e.g., prompt engineering, multi-agent systems). We analyze how these techniques are applied across different data modalities (text, image, code) and in key clinical applications such as diagnosis, education, and treatment planning. Furthermore, we survey the evolution of evaluation benchmarks from simple accuracy metrics to sophisticated assessments of reasoning quality and visual interpretability. Based on an analysis of 60 seminal studies from 2022-2025, we conclude by identifying critical challenges, including the faithfulness-plausibility gap and the need for native multimodal reasoning, and outlining future directions toward building efficient, robust, and sociotechnically responsible medical AI.

Related papers

• Prompt Mechanisms in Medical Imaging: A Comprehensive Survey [18.072753363565322]
  Deep learning offers transformative potential in medical imaging.<n>Yet its clinical adoption is frequently hampered by challenges such as data scarcity, distribution shifts, and the need for robust task generalization.<n>Prompt-based methodologies have emerged as a pivotal strategy to guide deep learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-28T03:06:25Z)
• MedBookVQA: A Systematic and Comprehensive Medical Benchmark Derived from Open-Access Book [5.318470975871017]
  We present MedBookVQA, a systematic and comprehensive multimodal benchmark derived from open-access medical textbooks.<n>We generate 5,000 clinically relevant questions spanning modality recognition, classification, anatomical identification, symptom diagnosis, and surgical procedures.<n>We evaluate a wide array of MLLMs, including proprietary, open-sourced, medical, and reasoning models, revealing significant performance disparities across task types and model categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-01T06:28:36Z)
• MedAgent-Pro: Towards Evidence-based Multi-modal Medical Diagnosis via Reasoning Agentic Workflow [14.478357882578234]
  In modern medicine, clinical diagnosis relies on the comprehensive analysis of primarily textual and visual data.<n>Recent advances in large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) and agent-based methods hold great potential for medical diagnosis.<n>We propose MedAgent-Pro, a new agentic reasoning paradigm that follows the diagnosis principle in modern medicine.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T14:04:18Z)
• Structured Outputs Enable General-Purpose LLMs to be Medical Experts [50.02627258858336]
  Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with open-ended medical questions.<n>We propose a novel approach utilizing structured medical reasoning.<n>Our approach achieves the highest Factuality Score of 85.8, surpassing fine-tuned models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T05:24:55Z)
• Systematic Literature Review on Clinical Trial Eligibility Matching [0.24554686192257422]
  Review highlights how explainable AI and standardized ontology can bolster clinician trust and broaden adoption.<n>Further research into advanced semantic and temporal representations, expanded data integration, and rigorous prospective evaluations is necessary to fully realize the transformative potential of NLP in clinical trial recruitment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-02T11:45:50Z)
• Uncertainty-aware abstention in medical diagnosis based on medical texts [87.88110503208016]
  This study addresses the critical issue of reliability for AI-assisted medical diagnosis.<n>We focus on the selection prediction approach that allows the diagnosis system to abstain from providing the decision if it is not confident in the diagnosis.<n>We introduce HUQ-2, a new state-of-the-art method for enhancing reliability in selective prediction tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T10:15:21Z)
• Reasoning-Enhanced Healthcare Predictions with Knowledge Graph Community Retrieval [61.70489848327436]
  KARE is a novel framework that integrates knowledge graph (KG) community-level retrieval with large language models (LLMs) reasoning.<n>Extensive experiments demonstrate that KARE outperforms leading models by up to 10.8-15.0% on MIMIC-III and 12.6-12.7% on MIMIC-IV for mortality and readmission predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T18:46:28Z)
• Toward Large Language Models as a Therapeutic Tool: Comparing Prompting Techniques to Improve GPT-Delivered Problem-Solving Therapy [6.952909762512736]
  We examine the effects of prompt engineering to guide Large Language Models (LLMs) in delivering parts of a Problem-Solving Therapy session via text. We demonstrate that the models' capability to deliver protocolized therapy can be improved with the proper use of prompt engineering methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-27T17:25:16Z)
• A Survey of Models for Cognitive Diagnosis: New Developments and Future Directions [66.40362209055023]
  This paper aims to provide a survey of current models for cognitive diagnosis, with more attention on new developments using machine learning-based methods. By comparing the model structures, parameter estimation algorithms, model evaluation methods and applications, we provide a relatively comprehensive review of the recent trends in cognitive diagnosis models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-07T18:02:00Z)
• Validating polyp and instrument segmentation methods in colonoscopy through Medico 2020 and MedAI 2021 Challenges [58.32937972322058]
  "Medico automatic polyp segmentation (Medico 2020)" and "MedAI: Transparency in Medical Image (MedAI 2021)" competitions. We present a comprehensive summary and analyze each contribution, highlight the strength of the best-performing methods, and discuss the possibility of clinical translations of such methods into the clinic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-30T16:08:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.