AI for Open Science: A Multi-Agent Perspective for Ethically Translating Data to Knowledge

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.18852v2
• Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 17:54:20 GMT
• Title: AI for Open Science: A Multi-Agent Perspective for Ethically Translating Data to Knowledge
• Authors: Chase Yakaboski, Gregory Hyde, Clement Nyanhongo and Eugene Santos Jr
• Abstract summary: We introduce the concept of AI for Open Science (AI4OS) as a multi-agent extension of AI4Science. Our goal is to ensure the natural consequence of AI4Science (e.g., self-driving labs) is a benefit not only for its developers but for society as a whole.
• Score: 4.055489363682199
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: AI for Science (AI4Science), particularly in the form of self-driving labs, has the potential to sideline human involvement and hinder scientific discovery within the broader community. While prior research has focused on ensuring the responsible deployment of AI applications, enhancing security, and ensuring interpretability, we also propose that promoting openness in AI4Science discoveries should be carefully considered. In this paper, we introduce the concept of AI for Open Science (AI4OS) as a multi-agent extension of AI4Science with the core principle of maximizing open knowledge translation throughout the scientific enterprise rather than a single organizational unit. We use the established principles of Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) to formalize a language around AI4OS. We then discuss three principle stages of knowledge translation embedded in AI4Science systems and detail specific points where openness can be applied to yield an AI4OS alternative. Lastly, we formulate a theoretical metric to assess AI4OS with a supporting ethical argument highlighting its importance. Our goal is that by drawing attention to AI4OS we can ensure the natural consequence of AI4Science (e.g., self-driving labs) is a benefit not only for its developers but for society as a whole.

Related papers

• AI4Research: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research [55.5452803680643]
  We present a comprehensive survey on AI for Research (AI4Research)<n>We first introduce a systematic taxonomy to classify five mainstream tasks in AI4Research.<n>We identify key research gaps and highlight promising future directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-02T17:19:20Z)
• A Community-driven vision for a new Knowledge Resource for AI [59.29703403953085]
  Despite the success of knowledge resources like WordNet, verifiable, general-purpose widely available sources of knowledge remain a critical deficiency in AI infrastructure.<n>This paper synthesizes our findings and outlines a community-driven vision for a new knowledge infrastructure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-19T20:51:28Z)
• The AI Scientist-v2: Workshop-Level Automated Scientific Discovery via Agentic Tree Search [16.93028430619359]
  The AI Scientist-v2 is an end-to-end agentic system capable of producing the first entirely AI generated peer-review-accepted workshop paper. It iteratively formulates scientific hypotheses, designs and executes experiments, analyzes and visualizes data, and autonomously authors scientific manuscripts. One manuscript achieved high enough scores to exceed the average human acceptance threshold, marking the first instance of a fully AI-generated paper successfully navigating a peer review.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T18:44:41Z)
• Scaling Laws in Scientific Discovery with AI and Robot Scientists [72.3420699173245]
  An autonomous generalist scientist (AGS) concept combines agentic AI and embodied robotics to automate the entire research lifecycle. AGS aims to significantly reduce the time and resources needed for scientific discovery. As these autonomous systems become increasingly integrated into the research process, we hypothesize that scientific discovery might adhere to new scaling laws.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-28T14:00:27Z)
• SciHorizon: Benchmarking AI-for-Science Readiness from Scientific Data to Large Language Models [36.724471610075696]
  We propose SciHorizon, a comprehensive assessment framework designed to benchmark the readiness of AI4Science from both scientific data and Large Language Models perspectives. First, we introduce a generalizable framework for assessing AI-ready scientific data, encompassing four key dimensions: Quality, FAIRness, Explainability, and Compliance. To assess the capabilities of LLMs across multiple scientific disciplines, we establish 16 assessment dimensions based on five core indicators Knowledge, Understanding, Reasoning, Multimodality, and Values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T11:34:41Z)
• Unlocking the Potential of AI Researchers in Scientific Discovery: What Is Missing? [20.94708392671015]
  We project that AI4Science's share of total publications will rise from 3.57% in 2024 to approximately 25% by 2050. We propose structured and actionable strategies to position AI researchers at the forefront of scientific discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T09:29:05Z)
• Generative AI Uses and Risks for Knowledge Workers in a Science Organization [4.035007094168652]
  Generative AI could enhance scientific discovery by supporting knowledge workers in science organizations. We report on a study with a US national laboratory with employees spanning Science and Operations about their use of generative AI tools. We have four findings: (1) Argo usage data shows small but increasing use by Science and Operations employees; Common current and envisioned use cases for generative AI in this context conceptually fall into either a (2) copilot or (3) workflow agent modality; and (4) Concerns include sensitive data security, academic publishing, and job impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-27T23:41:13Z)
• Bridging AI and Science: Implications from a Large-Scale Literature Analysis of AI4Science [25.683422870223076]
  We present a large-scale analysis of the AI4Science literature. We quantitatively highlight key disparities between AI methods and scientific problems. We explore the potential and challenges of facilitating collaboration between AI and scientific communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-27T00:40:51Z)
• Using AI Alignment Theory to understand the potential pitfalls of regulatory frameworks [55.2480439325792]
  This paper critically examines the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) Uses insights from Alignment Theory (AT) research, which focuses on the potential pitfalls of technical alignment in Artificial Intelligence. As we apply these concepts to the EU AI Act, we uncover potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement in the regulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T17:38:38Z)
• Control Risk for Potential Misuse of Artificial Intelligence in Science [85.91232985405554]
  We aim to raise awareness of the dangers of AI misuse in science. We highlight real-world examples of misuse in chemical science. We propose a system called SciGuard to control misuse risks for AI models in science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-11T18:50:57Z)
• Trust, Accountability, and Autonomy in Knowledge Graph-based AI for Self-determination [1.4305544869388402]
  Knowledge Graphs (KGs) have emerged as fundamental platforms for powering intelligent decision-making. The integration of KGs with neuronal learning is currently a topic of active research. This paper conceptualises the foundational topics and research pillars to support KG-based AI for self-determination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T12:51:52Z)
• Artificial Intelligence for Science in Quantum, Atomistic, and Continuum Systems [268.585904751315]
  New area of research known as AI for science (AI4Science) Areas aim at understanding the physical world from subatomic (wavefunctions and electron density), atomic (molecules, proteins, materials, and interactions), to macro (fluids, climate, and subsurface) scales. Key common challenge is how to capture physics first principles, especially symmetries, in natural systems by deep learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T12:14:14Z)
• The Future of Fundamental Science Led by Generative Closed-Loop Artificial Intelligence [67.70415658080121]
  Recent advances in machine learning and AI are disrupting technological innovation, product development, and society as a whole. AI has contributed less to fundamental science in part because large data sets of high-quality data for scientific practice and model discovery are more difficult to access. Here we explore and investigate aspects of an AI-driven, automated, closed-loop approach to scientific discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-09T21:16:56Z)
• Confident AI [0.0]
  We propose "Confident AI" as a means to designing Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) systems with both algorithm and user confidence in model predictions and reported results. The 4 basic tenets of Confident AI are Repeatability, Believability, Sufficiency, and Adaptability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-12T02:26:46Z)
• Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) [58.981120701284816]
  Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations. It will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T18:53:09Z)
• Ethical AI for Social Good [0.0]
  The concept of AI for Social Good(AI4SG) is gaining momentum in both information societies and the AI community. This paper fills the vacuum by addressing the ethical aspects that are critical for future AI4SG efforts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-14T15:16:51Z)
• Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
  We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being. For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.