A Comprehensive Study of Governance Issues in Decentralized Finance Applications

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.01433v3
• Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 14:46:28 GMT
• Title: A Comprehensive Study of Governance Issues in Decentralized Finance Applications
• Authors: Wei Ma, Chenguang Zhu, Ye Liu, Xiaofei Xie, Yi Li
• Abstract summary: We present a comprehensive study of governance issues in DeFi applications. We collect and build a dataset of 4,446 audit reports from 17 Web3 security companies. Our findings highlight a significant observation: the disparity between smart contract code and DeFi whitepapers plays a central role in these governance issues.
• Score: 45.033994319846244
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Decentralized Finance (DeFi) is a prominent application of smart contracts, representing a novel financial paradigm in contrast to centralized finance. While DeFi applications are rapidly emerging on mainstream blockchain platforms, their quality varies greatly, presenting numerous challenges, particularly in terms of their governance mechanisms. In this paper, we present a comprehensive study of governance issues in DeFi applications. Drawing upon insights from industry reports and academic research articles, we develop a taxonomy to categorize these governance issues. We collect and build a dataset of 4,446 audit reports from 17 Web3 security companies, categorizing their governance issues according to our constructed taxonomy. We conducted a thorough analysis of governance issues and identified vulnerabilities in governance design and implementation, e.g., voting sybil attack and proposal front-running. Our findings highlight a significant observation: the disparity between smart contract code and DeFi whitepapers plays a central role in these governance issues. As an initial step to address the challenges of code-whitepaper consistency checks for DeFi applications, we built a machine-learning-based prototype, and validated its performance on eight widely used DeFi projects, achieving a 56.14% F1 score and a 80% recall. Our study culminates in providing several key practical implications for various DeFi stakeholders, including developers, users, researchers, and regulators, aiming to deepen the understanding of DeFi governance issues and contribute to the robust growth of DeFi systems.

Related papers

• Decoding Decentralized Finance Transactions through Ego Network Motif Mining [1.9253333342733674]
  This paper presents a method to extract ego network motifs from the token transfer network, capturing the transfer of tokens between users and smart contracts. Our results demonstrate that smart contract methods performing specific DeFi operations can be efficiently identified by analyzing these motifs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T11:38:59Z)
• Mechanistic interpretability of large language models with applications to the financial services industry [0.0]
  We are pioneering the use of mechanistic interpretability to shed some light on the inner workings of large language models for use in financial services applications. In particular, we investigate GPT-2 Small's attention pattern when prompted to identify potential violation of Fair Lending laws.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T19:59:53Z)
• FinBen: A Holistic Financial Benchmark for Large Language Models [75.09474986283394]
  FinBen is the first extensive open-source evaluation benchmark, including 36 datasets spanning 24 financial tasks. FinBen offers several key innovations: a broader range of tasks and datasets, the first evaluation of stock trading, novel agent and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) evaluation, and three novel open-source evaluation datasets for text summarization, question answering, and stock trading.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T02:16:16Z)
• Competition-Level Problems are Effective LLM Evaluators [121.15880285283116]
  This paper aims to evaluate the reasoning capacities of large language models (LLMs) in solving recent programming problems in Codeforces. We first provide a comprehensive evaluation of GPT-4's peiceived zero-shot performance on this task, considering various aspects such as problems' release time, difficulties, and types of errors encountered. Surprisingly, theThoughtived performance of GPT-4 has experienced a cliff like decline in problems after September 2021 consistently across all the difficulties and types of problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T18:58:57Z)
• Decentralized Finance: Protocols, Risks, and Governance [7.642646077340122]
  We argue how shortcomings and frictions are being mitigated by the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem. We highlight the pros and cons of the novel form of decentralized governance introduced via the ownership of governance tokens. We conclude by emphasizing the need for future research to focus on the scalability of existing blockchains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-02T03:47:57Z)
• Empirical Review of Smart Contract and DeFi Security: Vulnerability Detection and Automated Repair [36.46679501556185]
  Decentralized Finance (DeFi) is emerging as a peer-to-peer financial ecosystem. smart contracts hold a massive amount of value, making them an attractive target for attacks. This paper reviews the progress made in the field of smart contract and DeFi security from the perspective of both vulnerability detection and automated repair.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-05T17:00:42Z)
• Smart Contract and DeFi Security Tools: Do They Meet the Needs of Practitioners? [10.771021805354911]
  Attacks targeting smart contracts are increasing, causing an estimated $6.45 billion in financial losses. We aim to shed light on the effectiveness of automated security tools in identifying vulnerabilities that can lead to high-profile attacks. Our findings reveal a stark reality: the tools could have prevented a mere 8% of the attacks in our dataset, amounting to $149 million out of the $2.3 billion in losses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T10:27:19Z)
• Causal Fairness Analysis [68.12191782657437]
  We introduce a framework for understanding, modeling, and possibly solving issues of fairness in decision-making settings. The main insight of our approach will be to link the quantification of the disparities present on the observed data with the underlying, and often unobserved, collection of causal mechanisms. Our effort culminates in the Fairness Map, which is the first systematic attempt to organize and explain the relationship between different criteria found in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-23T01:06:34Z)
• FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Data [52.7249610894623]
  We focus on answering deep questions over financial data, aiming to automate the analysis of a large corpus of financial documents. We propose a new large-scale dataset, FinQA, with Question-Answering pairs over Financial reports, written by financial experts. The results demonstrate that popular, large, pre-trained models fall far short of expert humans in acquiring finance knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-01T00:08:14Z)
• Insights into Fairness through Trust: Multi-scale Trust Quantification for Financial Deep Learning [94.65749466106664]
  A fundamental aspect of fairness that has not been explored in financial deep learning is the concept of trust. We conduct multi-scale trust quantification on a deep neural network for the purpose of credit card default prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-03T19:05:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.