Tackling Concept Shift in Text Classification using Entailment-style Modeling

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.03320v1
• Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 18:15:36 GMT
• Title: Tackling Concept Shift in Text Classification using Entailment-style Modeling
• Authors: Sumegh Roychowdhury, Karan Gupta, Siva Rajesh Kasa, Prasanna Srinivasa Murthy, Alok Chandra
• Abstract summary: We propose a reformulation, converting vanilla classification into an entailment-style problem. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method on both real world & synthetic datasets.
• Score: 2.2588825300186426
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Pre-trained language models (PLMs) have seen tremendous success in text classification (TC) problems in the context of Natural Language Processing (NLP). In many real-world text classification tasks, the class definitions being learned do not remain constant but rather change with time - this is known as Concept Shift. Most techniques for handling concept shift rely on retraining the old classifiers with the newly labelled data. However, given the amount of training data required to fine-tune large DL models for the new concepts, the associated labelling costs can be prohibitively expensive and time consuming. In this work, we propose a reformulation, converting vanilla classification into an entailment-style problem that requires significantly less data to re-train the text classifier to adapt to new concepts. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method on both real world & synthetic datasets achieving absolute F1 gains upto 7% and 40% respectively in few-shot settings. Further, upon deployment, our solution also helped save 75% of labeling costs overall.

Related papers

• Co-training for Low Resource Scientific Natural Language Inference [65.37685198688538]
  We propose a novel co-training method that assigns weights based on the training dynamics of the classifiers to the distantly supervised labels. By assigning importance weights instead of filtering out examples based on an arbitrary threshold on the predicted confidence, we maximize the usage of automatically labeled data. The proposed method obtains an improvement of 1.5% in Macro F1 over the distant supervision baseline, and substantial improvements over several other strong SSL baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T18:35:47Z)
• Enhancing Visual Continual Learning with Language-Guided Supervision [76.38481740848434]
  Continual learning aims to empower models to learn new tasks without forgetting previously acquired knowledge. We argue that the scarce semantic information conveyed by the one-hot labels hampers the effective knowledge transfer across tasks. Specifically, we use PLMs to generate semantic targets for each class, which are frozen and serve as supervision signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-24T12:41:58Z)
• Rethinking Classifier Re-Training in Long-Tailed Recognition: A Simple Logits Retargeting Approach [102.0769560460338]
  We develop a simple logits approach (LORT) without the requirement of prior knowledge of the number of samples per class. Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on various imbalanced datasets, including CIFAR100-LT, ImageNet-LT, and iNaturalist 2018.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-01T03:27:08Z)
• Few-Shot Learning with Siamese Networks and Label Tuning [5.006086647446482]
  We show that with proper pre-training, Siamese Networks that embed texts and labels offer a competitive alternative. We introduce label tuning, a simple and computationally efficient approach that allows to adapt the models in a few-shot setup by only changing the label embeddings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-28T11:16:46Z)
• Revisiting Self-Training for Few-Shot Learning of Language Model [61.173976954360334]
  Unlabeled data carry rich task-relevant information, they are proven useful for few-shot learning of language model. In this work, we revisit the self-training technique for language model fine-tuning and present a state-of-the-art prompt-based few-shot learner, SFLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-04T08:51:36Z)
• Few-Shot Incremental Learning with Continually Evolved Classifiers [46.278573301326276]
  Few-shot class-incremental learning (FSCIL) aims to design machine learning algorithms that can continually learn new concepts from a few data points. The difficulty lies in that limited data from new classes not only lead to significant overfitting issues but also exacerbate the notorious catastrophic forgetting problems. We propose a Continually Evolved CIF ( CEC) that employs a graph model to propagate context information between classifiers for adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T10:54:51Z)
• Partial Is Better Than All: Revisiting Fine-tuning Strategy for Few-shot Learning [76.98364915566292]
  A common practice is to train a model on the base set first and then transfer to novel classes through fine-tuning. We propose to transfer partial knowledge by freezing or fine-tuning particular layer(s) in the base model. We conduct extensive experiments on CUB and mini-ImageNet to demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-08T03:27:05Z)
• Cold-start Active Learning through Self-supervised Language Modeling [15.551710499866239]
  Active learning aims to reduce annotation costs by choosing the most critical examples to label. With BERT, we develop a simple strategy based on the masked language modeling loss. Compared to other baselines, our approach reaches higher accuracy within less sampling iterations and time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T14:09:17Z)
• The Right Tool for the Job: Matching Model and Instance Complexities [62.95183777679024]
  As NLP models become larger, executing a trained model requires significant computational resources incurring monetary and environmental costs. We propose a modification to contextual representation fine-tuning which, during inference, allows for an early (and fast) "exit" We test our proposed modification on five different datasets in two tasks: three text classification datasets and two natural language inference benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-16T04:28:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.