Learned Causal Method Prediction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.03989v2
• Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 07:53:17 GMT
• Title: Learned Causal Method Prediction
• Authors: Shantanu Gupta, Cheng Zhang, Agrin Hilmkil
• Abstract summary: We propose CAusal Method Predictor ( CAMP), a framework for predicting the best method for a given dataset. We generate datasets from a diverse set of synthetic causal models, score the candidate methods, and train a model to directly predict the highest-scoring method for that dataset. Our strategy learns to map implicit dataset properties to the best method in a data-driven manner.
• Score: 10.36548504177628
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: For a given causal question, it is important to efficiently decide which causal inference method to use for a given dataset. This is challenging because causal methods typically rely on complex and difficult-to-verify assumptions, and cross-validation is not applicable since ground truth causal quantities are unobserved. In this work, we propose CAusal Method Predictor (CAMP), a framework for predicting the best method for a given dataset. To this end, we generate datasets from a diverse set of synthetic causal models, score the candidate methods, and train a model to directly predict the highest-scoring method for that dataset. Next, by formulating a self-supervised pre-training objective centered on dataset assumptions relevant for causal inference, we significantly reduce the need for costly labeled data and enhance training efficiency. Our strategy learns to map implicit dataset properties to the best method in a data-driven manner. In our experiments, we focus on method prediction for causal discovery. CAMP outperforms selecting any individual candidate method and demonstrates promising generalization to unseen semi-synthetic and real-world benchmarks.

Related papers

• Capturing the Temporal Dependence of Training Data Influence [100.91355498124527]
  We formalize the concept of trajectory-specific leave-one-out influence, which quantifies the impact of removing a data point during training. We propose data value embedding, a novel technique enabling efficient approximation of trajectory-specific LOO. As data value embedding captures training data ordering, it offers valuable insights into model training dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-12T18:28:55Z)
• Data Pruning in Generative Diffusion Models [2.0111637969968]
  Generative models aim to estimate the underlying distribution of the data, so presumably they should benefit from larger datasets. We show that eliminating redundant or noisy data in large datasets is beneficial particularly when done strategically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-19T14:13:25Z)
• Ranking and Combining Latent Structured Predictive Scores without Labeled Data [2.5064967708371553]
  This paper introduces a novel structured unsupervised ensemble learning model (SUEL) It exploits the dependency between a set of predictors with continuous predictive scores, rank the predictors without labeled data and combine them to an ensembled score with weights. The efficacy of the proposed methods is rigorously assessed through both simulation studies and real-world application of risk genes discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T20:14:42Z)
• Stratified Prediction-Powered Inference for Hybrid Language Model Evaluation [62.2436697657307]
  Prediction-powered inference (PPI) is a method that improves statistical estimates based on limited human-labeled data. We propose a method called Stratified Prediction-Powered Inference (StratPPI) We show that the basic PPI estimates can be considerably improved by employing simple data stratification strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T17:37:39Z)
• How to Train Data-Efficient LLMs [56.41105687693619]
  We study data-efficient approaches for pre-training language models (LLMs) We find that Ask-LLM and Density sampling are the best methods in their respective categories. In our comparison of 19 samplers, involving hundreds of evaluation tasks and pre-training runs, we find that Ask-LLM and Density are the best methods in their respective categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T02:27:57Z)
• Querying Easily Flip-flopped Samples for Deep Active Learning [63.62397322172216]
  Active learning is a machine learning paradigm that aims to improve the performance of a model by strategically selecting and querying unlabeled data. One effective selection strategy is to base it on the model's predictive uncertainty, which can be interpreted as a measure of how informative a sample is. This paper proposes the it least disagree metric (LDM) as the smallest probability of disagreement of the predicted label.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-18T08:12:23Z)
• Improved Distribution Matching for Dataset Condensation [91.55972945798531]
  We propose a novel dataset condensation method based on distribution matching. Our simple yet effective method outperforms most previous optimization-oriented methods with much fewer computational resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-19T04:07:33Z)
• Evaluating Causal Inference Methods [0.4588028371034407]
  We introduce a deep generative model-based framework, Credence, to validate causal inference methods. Our work introduces a deep generative model-based framework, Credence, to validate causal inference methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-09T00:21:22Z)
• Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performance [63.740181251997306]
  Real-world machine learning deployments are characterized by mismatches between the source (training) and target (test) distributions. In this work, we investigate methods for predicting the target domain accuracy using only labeled source data and unlabeled target data. We propose Average Thresholded Confidence (ATC), a practical method that learns a threshold on the model's confidence, predicting accuracy as the fraction of unlabeled examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T23:01:12Z)
• Deep Learning with Multiple Data Set: A Weighted Goal Programming Approach [2.7393821783237184]
  Large-scale data analysis is growing at an exponential rate as data proliferates in our societies. Deep Learning models require plenty of resources, and distributed training is needed. This paper presents a Multicriteria approach for distributed learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-27T07:10:25Z)
• Learning while Respecting Privacy and Robustness to Distributional Uncertainties and Adversarial Data [66.78671826743884]
  The distributionally robust optimization framework is considered for training a parametric model. The objective is to endow the trained model with robustness against adversarially manipulated input data. Proposed algorithms offer robustness with little overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-07T18:25:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.