An Agenda for Disinformation Research

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.08572v1
• Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 19:32:36 GMT
• Title: An Agenda for Disinformation Research
• Authors: Nadya Bliss, Elizabeth Bradley, Joshua Garland, Filippo Menczer, Scott W. Ruston, Kate Starbird, and Chris Wiggins
• Abstract summary: Disinformation erodes trust in the socio-political institutions that are the fundamental fabric of democracy. The distribution of false, misleading, or inaccurate information with the intent to deceive is an existential threat to the United States. New tools and approaches must be developed to leverage these affordances to understand and address this growing challenge.
• Score: 3.083055913556838
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In the 21st Century information environment, adversarial actors use disinformation to manipulate public opinion. The distribution of false, misleading, or inaccurate information with the intent to deceive is an existential threat to the United States--distortion of information erodes trust in the socio-political institutions that are the fundamental fabric of democracy: legitimate news sources, scientists, experts, and even fellow citizens. As a result, it becomes difficult for society to come together within a shared reality; the common ground needed to function effectively as an economy and a nation. Computing and communication technologies have facilitated the exchange of information at unprecedented speeds and scales. This has had countless benefits to society and the economy, but it has also played a fundamental role in the rising volume, variety, and velocity of disinformation. Technological advances have created new opportunities for manipulation, influence, and deceit. They have effectively lowered the barriers to reaching large audiences, diminishing the role of traditional mass media along with the editorial oversight they provided. The digitization of information exchange, however, also makes the practices of disinformation detectable, the networks of influence discernable, and suspicious content characterizable. New tools and approaches must be developed to leverage these affordances to understand and address this growing challenge.

Related papers

• MisinfoEval: Generative AI in the Era of "Alternative Facts" [50.069577397751175]
  We introduce a framework for generating and evaluating large language model (LLM) based misinformation interventions. We present (1) an experiment with a simulated social media environment to measure effectiveness of misinformation interventions, and (2) a second experiment with personalized explanations tailored to the demographics and beliefs of users. Our findings confirm that LLM-based interventions are highly effective at correcting user behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-13T18:16:50Z)
• News and Misinformation Consumption in Europe: A Longitudinal Cross-Country Perspective [49.1574468325115]
  This study investigated information consumption in four European countries. It analyzed three years of Twitter activity from news outlet accounts in France, Germany, Italy, and the UK. Results indicate that reliable sources dominate the information landscape, although unreliable content is still present across all countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-09T16:22:10Z)
• Debunking Disinformation: Revolutionizing Truth with NLP in Fake News Detection [7.732570307576947]
  The Internet and social media have altered how individuals access news in the age of instantaneous information distribution. Fake news is rapidly spreading on digital platforms, which has a negative impact on the media ecosystem. Natural Language Processing has emerged as a potent weapon in the growing war against disinformation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-30T21:25:31Z)
• Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
  We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases. We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions. Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z)
• A Modality-level Explainable Framework for Misinformation Checking in Social Networks [2.4028383570062606]
  This paper addresses automatic misinformation checking in social networks from a multimodal perspective. Our framework comprises a misinformation classifier assisted by explainable methods to generate modality-oriented explainable inferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-08T13:57:06Z)
• Adherence to Misinformation on Social Media Through Socio-Cognitive and Group-Based Processes [79.79659145328856]
  We argue that when misinformation proliferates, this happens because the social media environment enables adherence to misinformation. We make the case that polarization and misinformation adherence are closely tied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T12:34:24Z)
• Adaptive cognitive fit: Artificial intelligence augmented management of information facets and representations [62.997667081978825]
  Explosive growth in big data technologies and artificial intelligence [AI] applications have led to increasing pervasiveness of information facets. Information facets, such as equivocality and veracity, can dominate and significantly influence human perceptions of information. We suggest that artificially intelligent technologies that can adapt information representations to overcome cognitive limitations are necessary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-25T02:47:25Z)
• SOK: Fake News Outbreak 2021: Can We Stop the Viral Spread? [5.64512235559998]
  Social Networks' omnipresence and ease of use has revolutionized the generation and distribution of information in today's world. Unlike traditional media channels, social networks facilitate faster and wider spread of disinformation and misinformation. Viral spread of false information has serious implications on the behaviors, attitudes and beliefs of the public.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-22T09:26:13Z)
• We Haven't Gone Paperless Yet: Why the Printing Press Can Help Us Understand Data and AI [0.0]
  This paper argues that the effects of data should be understood as a shift in social and political relations. We explore how data, or quantification of human and non-human factors into binary code, affects the identity of individuals and groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-26T17:22:47Z)
• Deception and the Strategy of Influence [0.7874708385247353]
  We explore how methods of deception including audience building, media hijacking, and community subversion inform the techniques and tradecraft of today's influence operators. We then discuss how a properly equipped and informed public can diagnose and counter malign influence operations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-02T21:39:00Z)
• Mining Disinformation and Fake News: Concepts, Methods, and Recent Advancements [55.33496599723126]
  disinformation including fake news has become a global phenomenon due to its explosive growth. Despite the recent progress in detecting disinformation and fake news, it is still non-trivial due to its complexity, diversity, multi-modality, and costs of fact-checking or annotation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-02T21:01:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.