Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models in Computational Argumentation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09022v3
• Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 09:40:58 GMT
• Title: Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models in Computational Argumentation
• Authors: Guizhen Chen, Liying Cheng, Luu Anh Tuan, Lidong Bing,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in understanding context and generating natural language. This work aims to embark on an assessment of LLMs, such as ChatGPT, Flan models, and LLaMA2 models, in both zero-shot and few-shot settings.
• Score: 54.85665903448207
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Computational argumentation has become an essential tool in various domains, including law, public policy, and artificial intelligence. It is an emerging research field in natural language processing that attracts increasing attention. Research on computational argumentation mainly involves two types of tasks: argument mining and argument generation. As large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in understanding context and generating natural language, it is worthwhile to evaluate the performance of LLMs on diverse computational argumentation tasks. This work aims to embark on an assessment of LLMs, such as ChatGPT, Flan models, and LLaMA2 models, in both zero-shot and few-shot settings. We organize existing tasks into six main categories and standardize the format of fourteen openly available datasets. In addition, we present a new benchmark dataset on counter speech generation that aims to holistically evaluate the end-to-end performance of LLMs on argument mining and argument generation. Extensive experiments show that LLMs exhibit commendable performance across most of the datasets, demonstrating their capabilities in the field of argumentation. Our analysis offers valuable suggestions for evaluating computational argumentation and its integration with LLMs in future research endeavors.

Related papers

• Evaluating Linguistic Capabilities of Multimodal LLMs in the Lens of Few-Shot Learning [15.919493497867567]
  This study aims to evaluate the performance of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) on the VALSE benchmark. We conducted a comprehensive assessment of state-of-the-art MLLMs, varying in model size and pretraining datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T11:26:47Z)
• Can formal argumentative reasoning enhance LLMs performances? [0.3659498819753633]
  We present a pipeline (MQArgEng) to evaluate the effect of introducing computational argumentation semantics on the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) Exploratory results indicate that MQArgEng provides a moderate performance gain in most of the examined topical categories and, as such, show promise and warrant further research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T22:09:31Z)
• Linguistic Intelligence in Large Language Models for Telecommunications [5.06945923921948]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a significant advancement in the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP) This study seeks to evaluate the knowledge and understanding capabilities of LLMs within the telecommunications domain. Our evaluation reveals that zero-shot LLMs can achieve performance levels comparable to the current state-of-the-art fine-tuned models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-24T14:01:07Z)
• Rethinking Interpretability in the Era of Large Language Models [76.1947554386879]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide array of tasks. The capability to explain in natural language allows LLMs to expand the scale and complexity of patterns that can be given to a human. These new capabilities raise new challenges, such as hallucinated explanations and immense computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T17:38:54Z)
• CLOMO: Counterfactual Logical Modification with Large Language Models [109.60793869938534]
  We introduce a novel task, Counterfactual Logical Modification (CLOMO), and a high-quality human-annotated benchmark. In this task, LLMs must adeptly alter a given argumentative text to uphold a predetermined logical relationship. We propose an innovative evaluation metric, the Self-Evaluation Score (SES), to directly evaluate the natural language output of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-29T08:29:54Z)
• L2CEval: Evaluating Language-to-Code Generation Capabilities of Large Language Models [102.00201523306986]
  We present L2CEval, a systematic evaluation of the language-to-code generation capabilities of large language models (LLMs) We analyze the factors that potentially affect their performance, such as model size, pretraining data, instruction tuning, and different prompting methods. In addition to assessing model performance, we measure confidence calibration for the models and conduct human evaluations of the output programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T17:57:00Z)
• LISA: Reasoning Segmentation via Large Language Model [68.24075852136761]
  We propose a new segmentation task -- reasoning segmentation. The task is designed to output a segmentation mask given a complex and implicit query text. We present LISA: large Language Instructed Assistant, which inherits the language generation capabilities of multimodal Large Language Models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-01T17:50:17Z)
• Sentiment Analysis in the Era of Large Language Models: A Reality Check [69.97942065617664]
  This paper investigates the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in performing various sentiment analysis tasks. We evaluate performance across 13 tasks on 26 datasets and compare the results against small language models (SLMs) trained on domain-specific datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T10:45:25Z)
• MEGA: Multilingual Evaluation of Generative AI [23.109803506475174]
  Generative AI models have shown impressive performance on many Natural Language Processing tasks. Most studies on generative LLMs have been restricted to English. It is unclear how capable these models are at understanding and generating text in other languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-22T13:03:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.