RecExplainer: Aligning Large Language Models for Explaining Recommendation Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.10947v2
- Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 08:34:47 GMT
- Title: RecExplainer: Aligning Large Language Models for Explaining Recommendation Models
- Authors: Yuxuan Lei, Jianxun Lian, Jing Yao, Xu Huang, Defu Lian, Xing Xie,
- Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable intelligence in understanding, reasoning, and instruction following.
This paper presents the initial exploration of using LLMs as surrogate models to explain black-box recommender models.
To facilitate an effective alignment, we introduce three methods: behavior alignment, intention alignment, and hybrid alignment.
- Score: 50.74181089742969
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Recommender systems are widely used in online services, with embedding-based models being particularly popular due to their expressiveness in representing complex signals. However, these models often function as a black box, making them less transparent and reliable for both users and developers. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable intelligence in understanding, reasoning, and instruction following. This paper presents the initial exploration of using LLMs as surrogate models to explaining black-box recommender models. The primary concept involves training LLMs to comprehend and emulate the behavior of target recommender models. By leveraging LLMs' own extensive world knowledge and multi-step reasoning abilities, these aligned LLMs can serve as advanced surrogates, capable of reasoning about observations. Moreover, employing natural language as an interface allows for the creation of customizable explanations that can be adapted to individual user preferences. To facilitate an effective alignment, we introduce three methods: behavior alignment, intention alignment, and hybrid alignment. Behavior alignment operates in the language space, representing user preferences and item information as text to mimic the target model's behavior; intention alignment works in the latent space of the recommendation model, using user and item representations to understand the model's behavior; hybrid alignment combines both language and latent spaces. Comprehensive experiments conducted on three public datasets show that our approach yields promising results in understanding and mimicking target models, producing high-quality, high-fidelity, and distinct explanations. Our code is available at https://github.com/microsoft/RecAI.
Related papers
- MetaAlign: Align Large Language Models with Diverse Preferences during Inference Time [50.41806216615488]
Large Language Models (LLMs) acquire extensive knowledge and remarkable abilities from extensive text corpora.
To make LLMs more usable, aligning them with human preferences is essential.
We propose an effective method, textbf MetaAlign, which aims to help LLMs dynamically align with various explicit or implicit preferences specified at inference time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-18T05:31:13Z) - User Preferences for Large Language Model versus Template-Based Explanations of Movie Recommendations: A Pilot Study [0.6965384453064829]
Large language models (LLMs) can generate more resonant explanations for recommender systems.
We conducted a pilot study with 25 participants.
Although subject to high variance, preliminary findings suggest that LLM-based explanations may provide a richer and more engaging user experience.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-10T07:51:53Z) - Language Representations Can be What Recommenders Need: Findings and Potentials [57.90679739598295]
We show that item representations, when linearly mapped from advanced LM representations, yield superior recommendation performance.
This outcome suggests the possible homomorphism between the advanced language representation space and an effective item representation space for recommendation.
Our findings highlight the connection between language modeling and behavior modeling, which can inspire both natural language processing and recommender system communities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-07T17:05:24Z) - Unlocking the Potential of Large Language Models for Explainable
Recommendations [55.29843710657637]
It remains uncertain what impact replacing the explanation generator with the recently emerging large language models (LLMs) would have.
In this study, we propose LLMXRec, a simple yet effective two-stage explainable recommendation framework.
By adopting several key fine-tuning techniques, controllable and fluent explanations can be well generated.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-25T09:09:54Z) - Reformulating Sequential Recommendation: Learning Dynamic User Interest with Content-enriched Language Modeling [18.297332953450514]
We propose LANCER, which leverages the semantic understanding capabilities of pre-trained language models to generate personalized recommendations.
Our approach bridges the gap between language models and recommender systems, resulting in more human-like recommendations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-19T08:54:47Z) - Evaluating and Explaining Large Language Models for Code Using Syntactic
Structures [74.93762031957883]
This paper introduces ASTxplainer, an explainability method specific to Large Language Models for code.
At its core, ASTxplainer provides an automated method for aligning token predictions with AST nodes.
We perform an empirical evaluation on 12 popular LLMs for code using a curated dataset of the most popular GitHub projects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-07T18:50:57Z) - Recommendation as Instruction Following: A Large Language Model
Empowered Recommendation Approach [83.62750225073341]
We consider recommendation as instruction following by large language models (LLMs)
We first design a general instruction format for describing the preference, intention, task form and context of a user in natural language.
Then we manually design 39 instruction templates and automatically generate a large amount of user-personalized instruction data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-11T17:39:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.