MetaAlign: Align Large Language Models with Diverse Preferences during Inference Time

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.14184v1
• Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 05:31:13 GMT
• Title: MetaAlign: Align Large Language Models with Diverse Preferences during Inference Time
• Authors: Mozhi Zhang, Pengyu Wang, Chenkun Tan, Mianqiu Huang, Dong Zhang, Yaqian Zhou, Xipeng Qiu,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) acquire extensive knowledge and remarkable abilities from extensive text corpora. To make LLMs more usable, aligning them with human preferences is essential. We propose an effective method, textbf MetaAlign, which aims to help LLMs dynamically align with various explicit or implicit preferences specified at inference time.
• Score: 50.41806216615488
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) acquire extensive knowledge and remarkable abilities from extensive text corpora, making them powerful tools for various applications. To make LLMs more usable, aligning them with human preferences is essential. Existing alignment techniques, such as Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), typically embed predefined preferences directly within the model's parameters. These methods, however, often result in a static alignment that can not account for the diversity of human preferences in practical applications. In response to this challenge, we propose an effective method, \textbf{MetaAlign}, which aims to help LLMs dynamically align with various explicit or implicit preferences specified at inference time. Experimental results show that LLMs optimized on our meticulously constructed MetaAlign Dataset can effectively align with any preferences specified at the inference stage, validating the feasibility of MetaAlign. We hope that our work can provide some insights into the alignment of language models.

Related papers

• Measuring What Makes You Unique: Difference-Aware User Modeling for Enhancing LLM Personalization [68.79814761867314]
  We propose Difference-aware Personalization Learning (DPL) to enhance Large Language Models (LLMs) personalization. DPL strategically selects representative users for comparison and establishes a structured standard to extract task-relevant differences. Experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate that DPL significantly enhances LLM personalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T09:53:26Z)
• Few-shot Steerable Alignment: Adapting Rewards and LLM Policies with Neural Processes [50.544186914115045]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in everyday applications. Ensuring their alignment with the diverse preferences of individual users has become a critical challenge. We present a novel framework for few-shot steerable alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T16:14:59Z)
• Align-SLM: Textless Spoken Language Models with Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback [50.84142264245052]
  This work introduces the Align-SLM framework to enhance the semantic understanding of textless Spoken Language Models (SLMs) Our approach generates multiple speech continuations from a given prompt and uses semantic metrics to create preference data for Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) We evaluate the framework using ZeroSpeech 2021 benchmarks for lexical and syntactic modeling, the spoken version of the StoryCloze dataset for semantic coherence, and other speech generation metrics, including the GPT4-o score and human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T06:07:53Z)
• Orchestrating LLMs with Different Personalizations [28.344891363780576]
  This paper presents a novel approach to aligning large language models (LLMs) with individual human preferences. Given stated preferences along multiple dimensions, such as helpfulness, conciseness, or humor, the goal is to create an LLM without re-training that best adheres to this specification. Starting from specialized expert LLMs, each trained for one particular preference dimension, we propose a black-box method that merges their outputs on a per-token level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T22:55:02Z)
• Understanding Alignment in Multimodal LLMs: A Comprehensive Study [46.33812471516309]
  We analyze each aspect of preference alignment in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) We show that combining offline and online methods can improve the performance of the model in certain scenarios. We introduce a novel way of creating multimodal preference data called Bias-Driven Hallucination Sampling (BDHS)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T17:55:03Z)
• Unified Preference Optimization: Language Model Alignment Beyond the Preference Frontier [0.5120567378386615]
  We propose a unified approach to aligning large language models (LLMs) Based on a simple decomposition of preference and auxiliary objectives, we allow for tuning LLMs to optimize user and designer preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T08:35:48Z)
• Multi-Reference Preference Optimization for Large Language Models [56.84730239046117]
  We introduce a novel closed-form formulation for direct preference optimization using multiple reference models. The resulting algorithm, Multi-Reference Preference Optimization (MRPO), leverages broader prior knowledge from diverse reference models. Our experiments demonstrate that LLMs finetuned with MRPO generalize better in various preference data, regardless of data scarcity or abundance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T00:29:04Z)
• PANDA: Preference Adaptation for Enhancing Domain-Specific Abilities of LLMs [49.32067576992511]
  Large language models often fall short of the performance achieved by domain-specific state-of-the-art models. One potential approach to enhance domain-specific capabilities of LLMs involves fine-tuning them using corresponding datasets. We propose Preference Adaptation for Enhancing Domain-specific Abilities of LLMs (PANDA) Our experimental results reveal that PANDA significantly enhances the domain-specific ability of LLMs on text classification and interactive decision tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T09:02:55Z)
• Active Preference Learning for Large Language Models [12.093302163058436]
  We develop an active learning strategy for DPO to make better use of preference labels. We propose a practical acquisition function for prompt/completion pairs based on the predictive entropy of the language model. We demonstrate how our approach improves both the rate of learning and final performance of fine-tuning on pairwise preference data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T23:09:00Z)
• Sample Efficient Preference Alignment in LLMs via Active Exploration [63.84454768573154]
  We take advantage of the fact that one can often choose contexts at which to obtain human feedback to most efficiently identify a good policy. We propose an active exploration algorithm to efficiently select the data and provide theoretical proof that it has a worst-case regret bound. Our method outperforms the baselines with limited samples of human preferences on several language models and four real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-01T00:54:02Z)
• RecExplainer: Aligning Large Language Models for Explaining Recommendation Models [50.74181089742969]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable intelligence in understanding, reasoning, and instruction following. This paper presents the initial exploration of using LLMs as surrogate models to explain black-box recommender models. To facilitate an effective alignment, we introduce three methods: behavior alignment, intention alignment, and hybrid alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-18T03:05:43Z)
• Personalized Soups: Personalized Large Language Model Alignment via Post-hoc Parameter Merging [148.77027765872006]
  We study Reinforcement Learning from Personalized Human Feedback (RLPHF) problem. LLMs are aligned to multiple preferences by modeling alignment as a Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning (MORL) problem. We show that we can achieve personalized alignment by decomposing preferences into multiple dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T20:22:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.