Using Causal Threads to Explain Changes in a Dynamic System

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.11334v1
• Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2023 14:32:06 GMT
• Title: Using Causal Threads to Explain Changes in a Dynamic System
• Authors: Robert B. Allen
• Abstract summary: We explore developing rich semantic models of systems. Specifically, we consider structured causal explanations about state changes in those systems. We construct a model of the causal threads for geological changes proposed by the Snowball Earth theory.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: We explore developing rich semantic models of systems. Specifically, we consider structured causal explanations about state changes in those systems. Essentially, we are developing process-based dynamic knowledge graphs. As an example, we construct a model of the causal threads for geological changes proposed by the Snowball Earth theory. Further, we describe an early prototype of a graphical interface to present the explanations. Unlike statistical approaches to summarization and explanation such as Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach of direct representation can be inspected and verified directly.

Related papers

• Towards Causal Physical Error Discovery in Video Analytics Systems [5.889781890680243]
  Video analytics systems based on deep learning models are often opaque and brittle. Current model explanation system are very good at giving literal explanations of behavior in terms of pixel contributions. This paper introduces the idea that a simple form of causal reasoning, called a regression discontinuity design, can be used to associate changes in multiple key performance indicators to physical real world phenomena.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T22:40:33Z)
• A Fixed-Point Approach for Causal Generative Modeling [20.88890689294816]
  We propose a novel formalism for describing Structural Causal Models (SCMs) as fixed-point problems on causally ordered variables. We establish the weakest known conditions for their unique recovery given the topological ordering (TO)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T12:29:05Z)
• An Axiomatic Approach to Model-Agnostic Concept Explanations [67.84000759813435]
  We propose an approach to concept explanations that satisfy three natural axioms: linearity, recursivity, and similarity. We then establish connections with previous concept explanation methods, offering insight into their varying semantic meanings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T20:53:35Z)
• Explainability for Large Language Models: A Survey [59.67574757137078]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in natural language processing. This paper introduces a taxonomy of explainability techniques and provides a structured overview of methods for explaining Transformer-based language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-02T22:14:26Z)
• Learning with Explanation Constraints [91.23736536228485]
  We provide a learning theoretic framework to analyze how explanations can improve the learning of our models. We demonstrate the benefits of our approach over a large array of synthetic and real-world experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-25T15:06:47Z)
• Motif-guided Time Series Counterfactual Explanations [1.1510009152620664]
  We propose a novel model that generates intuitive post-hoc counterfactual explanations. We validated our model using five real-world time-series datasets from the UCR repository.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-08T17:56:50Z)
• CLEAR: Generative Counterfactual Explanations on Graphs [60.30009215290265]
  We study the problem of counterfactual explanation generation on graphs. A few studies have explored counterfactual explanations on graphs, but many challenges of this problem are still not well-addressed. We propose a novel framework CLEAR which aims to generate counterfactual explanations on graphs for graph-level prediction models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-16T04:35:32Z)
• Explaining Causal Models with Argumentation: the Case of Bi-variate Reinforcement [15.947501347927687]
  We introduce a conceptualisation for generating argumentation frameworks (AFs) from causal models. The conceptualisation is based on reinterpreting desirable properties of semantics of AFs as explanation moulds. We perform a theoretical evaluation of these argumentative explanations, examining whether they satisfy a range of desirable explanatory and argumentative properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T19:39:51Z)
• Explainability in Process Outcome Prediction: Guidelines to Obtain Interpretable and Faithful Models [77.34726150561087]
  We define explainability through the interpretability of the explanations and the faithfulness of the explainability model in the field of process outcome prediction. This paper contributes a set of guidelines named X-MOP which allows selecting the appropriate model based on the event log specifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-30T05:59:50Z)
• Causal Discovery in Physical Systems from Videos [123.79211190669821]
  Causal discovery is at the core of human cognition. We consider the task of causal discovery from videos in an end-to-end fashion without supervision on the ground-truth graph structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-01T17:29:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.