Continuous Management of Machine Learning-Based Application Behavior

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.12686v5
• Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2024 14:24:33 GMT
• Title: Continuous Management of Machine Learning-Based Application Behavior
• Authors: Marco Anisetti, Claudio A. Ardagna, Nicola Bena, Ernesto Damiani, Paolo G. Panero,
• Abstract summary: Non-functional properties of Machine Learning models must be monitored, verified, and maintained. We propose a multi-model approach that aims to guarantee a stable non-functional behavior of ML-based applications. We experimentally evaluate our solution in a real-world scenario focusing on non-functional property fairness.
• Score: 3.316045828362788
• License:
• Abstract: Modern applications are increasingly driven by Machine Learning (ML) models whose non-deterministic behavior is affecting the entire application life cycle from design to operation. The pervasive adoption of ML is urgently calling for approaches that guarantee a stable non-functional behavior of ML-based applications over time and across model changes. To this aim, non-functional properties of ML models, such as privacy, confidentiality, fairness, and explainability, must be monitored, verified, and maintained. Existing approaches mostly focus on i) implementing solutions for classifier selection according to the functional behavior of ML models, ii) finding new algorithmic solutions, such as continuous re-training. In this paper, we propose a multi-model approach that aims to guarantee a stable non-functional behavior of ML-based applications. An architectural and methodological approach is provided to compare multiple ML models showing similar non-functional properties and select the model supporting stable non-functional behavior over time according to (dynamic and unpredictable) contextual changes. Our approach goes beyond the state of the art by providing a solution that continuously guarantees a stable non-functional behavior of ML-based applications, is ML algorithm-agnostic, and is driven by non-functional properties assessed on the ML models themselves. It consists of a two-step process working during application operation, where model assessment verifies non-functional properties of ML models trained and selected at development time, and model substitution guarantees continuous and stable support of non-functional properties. We experimentally evaluate our solution in a real-world scenario focusing on non-functional property fairness.

Related papers

• Self-Healing Machine Learning: A Framework for Autonomous Adaptation in Real-World Environments [50.310636905746975]
  Real-world machine learning systems often encounter model performance degradation due to distributional shifts in the underlying data generating process. Existing approaches to addressing shifts, such as concept drift adaptation, are limited by their reason-agnostic nature. We propose self-healing machine learning (SHML) to overcome these limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T20:05:51Z)
• Using Quality Attribute Scenarios for ML Model Test Case Generation [3.9111051646728527]
  Current practice for machine learning (ML) model testing prioritizes testing for model performance. This paper presents an approach based on quality attribute (QA) scenarios to elicit and define system- and model-relevant test cases. The QA-based approach has been integrated into MLTE, a process and tool to support ML model test and evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T18:26:42Z)
• Observational Scaling Laws and the Predictability of Language Model Performance [51.2336010244645]
  We propose an observational approach that bypasses model training and instead builds scaling laws from 100 publically available models. We show that several emergent phenomena follow a smooth, sigmoidal behavior and are predictable from small models. We show how to predict the impact of post-training interventions like Chain-of-Thought and Self-Consistency as language model capabilities continue to improve.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T17:49:44Z)
• Towards Self-Adaptive Machine Learning-Enabled Systems Through QoS-Aware Model Switching [1.2277343096128712]
  We propose the concept of a Machine Learning Model Balancer, focusing on managing uncertainties related to ML models by using multiple models. AdaMLS is a novel self-adaptation approach that leverages this concept and extends the traditional MAPE-K loop for continuous MLS adaptation. Preliminary results suggest AdaMLS surpasses naive and single state-of-the-art models in guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-19T09:33:51Z)
• Stability Guarantees for Feature Attributions with Multiplicative Smoothing [11.675168649032875]
  We analyze stability as a property for reliable feature attribution methods. We develop a smoothing method called Multiplicative Smoothing (MuS) to achieve such a model. We evaluate MuS on vision and language models with various feature attribution methods, such as LIME and SHAP, and demonstrate that MuS endows feature attributions with non-trivial stability guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-12T04:19:47Z)
• Leaving the Nest: Going Beyond Local Loss Functions for Predict-Then-Optimize [57.22851616806617]
  We show that our method achieves state-of-the-art results in four domains from the literature. Our approach outperforms the best existing method by nearly 200% when the localness assumption is broken.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T11:17:45Z)
• Bayesian Active Learning for Discrete Latent Variable Models [19.852463786440122]
  Active learning seeks to reduce the amount of data required to fit the parameters of a model. latent variable models play a vital role in neuroscience, psychology, and a variety of other engineering and scientific disciplines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-27T19:07:12Z)
• Learning continuous models for continuous physics [94.42705784823997]
  We develop a test based on numerical analysis theory to validate machine learning models for science and engineering applications. Our results illustrate how principled numerical analysis methods can be coupled with existing ML training/testing methodologies to validate models for science and engineering applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-17T07:56:46Z)
• Model-Invariant State Abstractions for Model-Based Reinforcement Learning [54.616645151708994]
  We introduce a new type of state abstraction called textitmodel-invariance. This allows for generalization to novel combinations of unseen values of state variables. We prove that an optimal policy can be learned over this model-invariance state abstraction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-19T10:37:54Z)
• Insights into Performance Fitness and Error Metrics for Machine Learning [1.827510863075184]
  Machine learning (ML) is the field of training machines to achieve high level of cognition and perform human-like analysis. This paper examines a number of the most commonly-used performance fitness and error metrics for regression and classification algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-17T22:59:04Z)
• Model-Augmented Actor-Critic: Backpropagating through Paths [81.86992776864729]
  Current model-based reinforcement learning approaches use the model simply as a learned black-box simulator. We show how to make more effective use of the model by exploiting its differentiability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-16T19:18:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.