Quantifying Impairment and Disease Severity Using AI Models Trained on Healthy Subjects

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.12781v1
• Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 18:45:52 GMT
• Title: Quantifying Impairment and Disease Severity Using AI Models Trained on Healthy Subjects
• Authors: Boyang Yu, Aakash Kaku, Kangning Liu, Avinash Parnandi, Emily Fokas, Anita Venkatesan, Natasha Pandit, Rajesh Ranganath, Heidi Schambra and Carlos Fernandez-Granda
• Abstract summary: COnfidence-Based chaRacterization of Anomalies (COBRA) score exploits the decrease in confidence of these models when presented with impaired or diseased patients. We applied the COBRA score to address a key limitation of current clinical evaluation of upper-body impairment in stroke patients.
• Score: 27.786240241494436
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Automatic assessment of impairment and disease severity is a key challenge in data-driven medicine. We propose a novel framework to address this challenge, which leverages AI models trained exclusively on healthy individuals. The COnfidence-Based chaRacterization of Anomalies (COBRA) score exploits the decrease in confidence of these models when presented with impaired or diseased patients to quantify their deviation from the healthy population. We applied the COBRA score to address a key limitation of current clinical evaluation of upper-body impairment in stroke patients. The gold-standard Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) requires in-person administration by a trained assessor for 30-45 minutes, which restricts monitoring frequency and precludes physicians from adapting rehabilitation protocols to the progress of each patient. The COBRA score, computed automatically in under one minute, is shown to be strongly correlated with the FMA on an independent test cohort for two different data modalities: wearable sensors ($\rho = 0.845$, 95% CI [0.743,0.908]) and video ($\rho = 0.746$, 95% C.I [0.594, 0.847]). To demonstrate the generalizability of the approach to other conditions, the COBRA score was also applied to quantify severity of knee osteoarthritis from magnetic-resonance imaging scans, again achieving significant correlation with an independent clinical assessment ($\rho = 0.644$, 95% C.I [0.585,0.696]).

Related papers

• Deep Learning Models to Automate the Scoring of Hand Radiographs for Rheumatoid Arthritis [0.0]
  The Sharp (SvdH) score is a widely used radiographic scoring method to quantify damage in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) in clinical trials. We developed a bespoke, automated pipeline that is capable of predicting the SvdH score and RA severity from hand radiographs without the need to localise the joints first.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-14T12:43:16Z)
• Detection of subclinical atherosclerosis by image-based deep learning on chest x-ray [86.38767955626179]
  Deep-learning algorithm to predict coronary artery calcium (CAC) score was developed on 460 chest x-ray. The diagnostic accuracy of the AICAC model assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) was the primary outcome.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T16:56:14Z)
• Automatic diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis severity using Swin transformer [55.01037422579516]
  Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a widespread condition that can cause chronic pain and stiffness in the knee joint. We propose an automated approach that employs the Swin Transformer to predict the severity of KOA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-10T09:49:30Z)
• Learning to diagnose cirrhosis from radiological and histological labels with joint self and weakly-supervised pretraining strategies [62.840338941861134]
  We propose to leverage transfer learning from large datasets annotated by radiologists, to predict the histological score available on a small annex dataset. We compare different pretraining methods, namely weakly-supervised and self-supervised ones, to improve the prediction of the cirrhosis. This method outperforms the baseline classification of the METAVIR score, reaching an AUC of 0.84 and a balanced accuracy of 0.75.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-16T17:06:23Z)
• Multimodal spatiotemporal graph neural networks for improved prediction of 30-day all-cause hospital readmission [4.609543591101764]
  We propose a multimodal, modality-agnostic graph neural network (MM-STGNN) for prediction of 30-day all-cause hospital readmission. MM-STGNN achieves AU of 0.79 on both primary and external datasets. For subset populations of patients with heart and vascular disease, our model also outperforms baselines on predicting 30-day readmission.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-14T05:50:07Z)
• Identifying Ventricular Arrhythmias and Their Predictors by Applying Machine Learning Methods to Electronic Health Records in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy(HCM-VAr-Risk Model) [0.3811495093928132]
  This is the first application of machine learning for identifying hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with ventricular arrhythmias (VAr) using clinical attributes. We evaluated 93 clinical variables, of which 22 proved predictive of VAr. Our method identified 12 new predictors of VAr, in addition to 10 established SCD predictors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-19T20:11:07Z)
• Controlling False Positive/Negative Rates for Deep-Learning-Based Prostate Cancer Detection on Multiparametric MR images [58.85481248101611]
  We propose a novel PCa detection network that incorporates a lesion-level cost-sensitive loss and an additional slice-level loss based on a lesion-to-slice mapping function. Our experiments based on 290 clinical patients concludes that 1) The lesion-level FNR was effectively reduced from 0.19 to 0.10 and the lesion-level FPR was reduced from 1.03 to 0.66 by changing the lesion-level cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-04T09:51:27Z)
• Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Prediction of Severe Outcomes in Suspected COVID-19 Infection [9.524156465126758]
  COVID-19 patient triaging with predictive outcome of the patients upon first present to emergency department (ED) is crucial for improving patient prognosis. We trained a deep feature fusion model to predict patient outcomes. Model output was patient outcomes defined as the most insensitive oxygen therapy required. Predictive risk scores for COVID-19 severe outcomes ("CO-RISK" score) were derived from model output and evaluated on the testing dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-21T00:03:27Z)
• Deep Learning Applied to Chest X-Rays: Exploiting and Preventing Shortcuts [11.511323714777298]
  This paper studies the case of spurious class skew in which patients with a particular attribute are spuriously more likely to have the outcome of interest. We show that deep nets can accurately identify many patient attributes including sex (AUROC = 0.96) and age (AUROC >= 0.90) when learning to predict a diagnosis. A simple transfer learning approach is surprisingly effective at preventing the shortcut and promoting good performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-21T18:52:43Z)
• COMPOSE: Cross-Modal Pseudo-Siamese Network for Patient Trial Matching [70.08786840301435]
  We propose CrOss-Modal PseudO-SiamEse network (COMPOSE) to address these challenges for patient-trial matching. Experiment results show COMPOSE can reach 98.0% AUC on patient-criteria matching and 83.7% accuracy on patient-trial matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T21:01:33Z)
• Automated Quantification of CT Patterns Associated with COVID-19 from Chest CT [48.785596536318884]
  The proposed method takes as input a non-contrasted chest CT and segments the lesions, lungs, and lobes in three dimensions. The method outputs two combined measures of the severity of lung and lobe involvement, quantifying both the extent of COVID-19 abnormalities and presence of high opacities. Evaluation of the algorithm is reported on CTs of 200 participants (100 COVID-19 confirmed patients and 100 healthy controls) from institutions from Canada, Europe and the United States.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-02T21:49:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.