Related papers: Ethical Implications of ChatGPT in Higher Education: A Scoping Review

Ethical Implications of ChatGPT in Higher Education: A Scoping Review

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.14378v3
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 12:42:20 GMT
Title: Ethical Implications of ChatGPT in Higher Education: A Scoping Review
Authors: Ming Li, Ariunaa Enkhtur, Fei Cheng, Beverley Anne Yamamoto,
Abstract summary: This scoping review explores the ethical challenges of using ChatGPT in higher education. By reviewing recent academic articles in English, Chinese, and Japanese, we aimed to provide a deep dive review and identify gaps in the literature.
Score: 11.567239416304714
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract: This scoping review explores the ethical challenges of using ChatGPT in higher education. By reviewing recent academic articles in English, Chinese, and Japanese, we aimed to provide a deep dive review and identify gaps in the literature. Drawing on Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) scoping review framework, we defined search terms and identified relevant publications from four databases in the three target languages. The research results showed that the majority of the papers were discussion papers, but there was some early empirical work. The ethical issues highlighted in these works mainly concern academic integrity, assessment issues, and data protection. Given the rapid deployment of generative artificial intelligence, it is imperative for educators to conduct more empirical studies to develop sound ethical policies for its use.

Related papers

Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and Evaluation [58.064940977804596]
A plethora of new AI models and tools has been proposed, promising to empower researchers and academics worldwide to conduct their research more effectively and efficiently. Ethical concerns regarding shortcomings of these tools and potential for misuse take a particularly prominent place in our discussion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-07T18:26:45Z)
The Only Way is Ethics: A Guide to Ethical Research with Large Language Models [53.316174782223115]
'LLM Ethics Whitepaper' is an open resource for NLP practitioners and those tasked with evaluating the ethical implications of others' work. Our goal is to translate ethics literature into concrete recommendations and provocations for thinking with clear first steps. 'LLM Ethics Whitepaper' distils a thorough literature review into clear Do's and Don'ts, which we present also in this paper.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-20T16:14:43Z)
A Literature Review of Literature Reviews in Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence [55.33653554387953]
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI) has led to numerous literature reviews aimed at collecting and fragmented information. This paper presents a thorough analysis of these literature reviews within the PAMI field. We try to address three core research questions: (1) What are the prevalent structural and statistical characteristics of PAMI literature reviews; (2) What strategies can researchers employ to efficiently navigate the growing corpus of reviews; and (3) What are the advantages and limitations of AI-generated reviews compared to human-authored ones.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-20T11:28:50Z)
Potential Societal Biases of ChatGPT in Higher Education: A Scoping Review [10.78182694538159]
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) models, such as ChatGPT, may inherit or amplify societal biases due to their training on extensive datasets. With the increasing usage of GAI by students, faculty, and staff in higher education institutions (HEIs), it is urgent to examine the ethical issues and potential biases associated with these technologies. This scoping review aims to elucidate how biases related to GAI in HEIs have been researched and discussed in recent academic publications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-24T10:00:23Z)
Science in the Era of ChatGPT, Large Language Models and Generative AI: Challenges for Research Ethics and How to Respond [3.3504365823045044]
This paper reviews challenges, ethical and integrity risks in science conduct in the advent of generative AI. The role of AI language models as a research instrument and subject is scrutinized along with ethical implications for scientists, participants and reviewers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T16:23:46Z)
Scientific Opinion Summarization: Paper Meta-review Generation Dataset, Methods, and Evaluation [55.00687185394986]
We propose the task of scientific opinion summarization, where research paper reviews are synthesized into meta-reviews. We introduce the ORSUM dataset covering 15,062 paper meta-reviews and 57,536 paper reviews from 47 conferences. Our experiments show that (1) human-written summaries do not always satisfy all necessary criteria such as depth of discussion, and identifying consensus and controversy for the specific domain, and (2) the combination of task decomposition and iterative self-refinement shows strong potential for enhancing the opinions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T02:33:35Z)
The impact and applications of ChatGPT: a systematic review of literature reviews [0.0]
ChatGPT has become one of the most widely used natural language processing tools. With thousands of published papers demonstrating its applications across various industries and fields, ChatGPT has sparked significant interest in the research community. An overview of the available evidence from multiple reviews and studies could provide further insights, minimize redundancy, and identify areas where further research is needed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-08T17:57:34Z)
Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model Enhanced Approach [77.61131357420201]
We conduct a thorough and rigorous study on fairness disparities in peer review with the help of large language models (LMs) We collect, assemble, and maintain a comprehensive relational database for the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) conference from 2017 to date. We postulate and study fairness disparities on multiple protective attributes of interest, including author gender, geography, author, and institutional prestige.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-07T16:19:42Z)
Use of Formal Ethical Reviews in NLP Literature: Historical Trends and Current Practices [6.195761193461355]
Ethical aspects of research in language technologies have received much attention recently. It is a standard practice to get a study involving human subjects reviewed and approved by a professional ethics committee/board of the institution. With the rising concerns and discourse around the ethics of NLP, do we also observe a rise in formal ethical reviews of NLP studies?
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-02T12:12:59Z)
Case Study: Deontological Ethics in NLP [119.53038547411062]
We study one ethical theory, namely deontological ethics, from the perspective of NLP. In particular, we focus on the generalization principle and the respect for autonomy through informed consent. We provide four case studies to demonstrate how these principles can be used with NLP systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-09T16:04:51Z)
Ethical issues with using Internet of Things devices in citizen science research: A scoping review [1.933681537640272]
This chapter presents a scoping review of published scientific studies that utilise both citizen scientists and Internet of Things devices. We selected studies where the authors had included at least a short discussion of the ethical issues encountered during the research process. Following this analysis, our discussion provides recommendations for researchers who wish to integrate citizen scientists and Internet of Things devices into their research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-18T12:22:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.