Knowledge Unlearning for LLMs: Tasks, Methods, and Challenges

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.15766v2
• Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 01:23:56 GMT
• Title: Knowledge Unlearning for LLMs: Tasks, Methods, and Challenges
• Authors: Nianwen Si, Hao Zhang, Heyu Chang, Wenlin Zhang, Dan Qu, Weiqiang Zhang
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have spurred a new research paradigm in natural language processing. Despite their excellent capability in knowledge-based question answering and reasoning, their potential to retain faulty or even harmful knowledge poses risks of malicious application. Knowledge unlearning, derived from analogous studies on machine unlearning, presents a promising avenue to address this concern.
• Score: 11.228131492745842
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have spurred a new research paradigm in natural language processing. Despite their excellent capability in knowledge-based question answering and reasoning, their potential to retain faulty or even harmful knowledge poses risks of malicious application. The challenge of mitigating this issue and transforming these models into purer assistants is crucial for their widespread applicability. Unfortunately, Retraining LLMs repeatedly to eliminate undesirable knowledge is impractical due to their immense parameters. Knowledge unlearning, derived from analogous studies on machine unlearning, presents a promising avenue to address this concern and is notably advantageous in the context of LLMs. It allows for the removal of harmful knowledge in an efficient manner, without affecting unrelated knowledge in the model. To this end, we provide a survey of knowledge unlearning in the era of LLMs. Firstly, we formally define the knowledge unlearning problem and distinguish it from related works. Subsequently, we categorize existing knowledge unlearning methods into three classes: those based on parameter optimization, parameter merging, and in-context learning, and introduce details of these unlearning methods. We further present evaluation datasets used in existing methods, and finally conclude this survey by presenting the ongoing challenges and future directions.

Related papers

• Exploring Knowledge Boundaries in Large Language Models for Retrieval Judgment [56.87031484108484]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly recognized for their practical applications. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) tackles this challenge and has shown a significant impact on LLMs. By minimizing retrieval requests that yield neutral or harmful results, we can effectively reduce both time and computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-09T15:12:28Z)
• Does your LLM truly unlearn? An embarrassingly simple approach to recover unlearned knowledge [36.524827594501495]
  We show that applying quantization to models that have undergone unlearning can restore the "forgotten" information. We find that for unlearning methods with utility constraints, the unlearned model retains an average of 21% of the intended forgotten knowledge in full precision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T19:28:37Z)
• Breaking Chains: Unraveling the Links in Multi-Hop Knowledge Unlearning [38.03304773600225]
  Large language models (LLMs) serve as giant information stores, often including personal or copyrighted data, and retraining them from scratch is not a viable option. We propose MUNCH, a simple uncertainty-based approach that breaks down multi-hop queries into subquestions and leverages the uncertainty of the unlearned model in final decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T07:00:15Z)
• To Forget or Not? Towards Practical Knowledge Unlearning for Large Language Models [39.39428450239399]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) trained on extensive corpora inevitably retain sensitive data, such as personal privacy information and copyrighted material. Recent advancements in knowledge unlearning involve updating LLM parameters to erase specific knowledge. We introduce KnowUnDo to evaluate if the unlearning process inadvertently erases essential knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T03:34:16Z)
• Untangle the KNOT: Interweaving Conflicting Knowledge and Reasoning Skills in Large Language Models [51.72963030032491]
  Knowledge documents for large language models (LLMs) may conflict with the memory of LLMs due to outdated or incorrect knowledge. We construct a new dataset, dubbed KNOT, for knowledge conflict resolution examination in the form of question answering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T16:40:11Z)
• Small Models, Big Insights: Leveraging Slim Proxy Models To Decide When and What to Retrieve for LLMs [60.40396361115776]
  This paper introduces a novel collaborative approach, namely SlimPLM, that detects missing knowledge in large language models (LLMs) with a slim proxy model. We employ a proxy model which has far fewer parameters, and take its answers as answers. Heuristic answers are then utilized to predict the knowledge required to answer the user question, as well as the known and unknown knowledge within the LLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T11:11:08Z)
• Towards Safer Large Language Models through Machine Unlearning [19.698620794387338]
  Selective Knowledge Unlearning ( SKU) is designed to eliminate harmful knowledge while preserving utility on normal prompts. First stage aims to identify and acquire harmful knowledge within the model, whereas the second is dedicated to remove this knowledge. Our experiments demonstrate that SKU identifies a good balance point between removing harmful information and preserving utility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T16:28:34Z)
• A Comprehensive Study of Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models [82.65729336401027]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown extraordinary capabilities in understanding and generating text that closely mirrors human communication. This paper defines the knowledge editing problem and provides a comprehensive review of cutting-edge approaches. We introduce a new benchmark, KnowEdit, for a comprehensive empirical evaluation of representative knowledge editing approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T16:54:58Z)
• Challenges and Contributing Factors in the Utilization of Large Language Models (LLMs) [10.039589841455136]
  This review explores the issue of domain specificity, where large language models (LLMs) may struggle to provide precise answers to specialized questions within niche fields. It's suggested to diversify training data, fine-tune models, enhance transparency and interpretability, and incorporate ethics and fairness training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T08:13:36Z)
• Self-Knowledge Guided Retrieval Augmentation for Large Language Models [59.771098292611846]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown superior performance without task-specific fine-tuning. Retrieval-based methods can offer non-parametric world knowledge and improve the performance on tasks such as question answering. Self-Knowledge guided Retrieval augmentation (SKR) is a simple yet effective method which can let LLMs refer to the questions they have previously encountered.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T04:22:33Z)
• Knowledge Rumination for Pre-trained Language Models [77.55888291165462]
  We propose a new paradigm dubbed Knowledge Rumination to help the pre-trained language model utilize related latent knowledge without retrieving it from the external corpus. We apply the proposed knowledge rumination to various language models, including RoBERTa, DeBERTa, and GPT-3.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T15:47:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.