Microarchitectural Security of AWS Firecracker VMM for Serverless Cloud Platforms

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.15999v1
• Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 16:46:03 GMT
• Title: Microarchitectural Security of AWS Firecracker VMM for Serverless Cloud Platforms
• Authors: Zane Weissman, Thore Tiemann, Thomas Eisenbarth, Berk Sunar,
• Abstract summary: Firecracker is a virtual machine manager built by Amazon Web Services (AWS) for serverless cloud platforms. We show that AWS overstates the security inherent to the Firecracker VMM and provides incomplete guidance for properly securing cloud systems that use Firecracker.
• Score: 9.345368209757495
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Firecracker is a virtual machine manager (VMM) built by Amazon Web Services (AWS) for serverless cloud platforms, services that run code for end users on a per-task basis, automatically managing server infrastructure. Firecracker provides fast and lightweight VMs and promises a combination of the speed of containers, typically used to isolate small tasks, and the security of VMs, which tend to provide greater isolation at the cost of performance. This combination of security and efficiency, AWS claims, makes it not only possible but safe to run thousands of user tasks from different users on the same hardware, with the host system frequently switching between active tasks. Though AWS states that microarchitectural attacks are included in their threat model, this class of attacks directly relies on shared hardware, just as the scalability of serverless computing relies on sharing hardware between unprecedented numbers of users. In this work, we investigate how secure Firecracker is against microarchitectural attacks. First, we review Firecracker's stated isolation model and recommended best practices for deployment, identify potential threat models for serverless platforms, and analyze potential weak points. Then, we use microarchitectural attack proof-of-concepts to test the isolation provided by Firecracker and find that it offers little protection against Spectre or MDS attacks. We discover two particularly concerning cases: 1) a Medusa variant that threatens Firecracker VMs but not processes running outside them, and is not mitigated by defenses recommended by AWS, and 2) a Spectre-PHT variant that remains exploitable even if recommended countermeasures are in place and SMT is disabled in the system. In summary, we show that AWS overstates the security inherent to the Firecracker VMM and provides incomplete guidance for properly securing cloud systems that use Firecracker.

Related papers

• Security Testbed for Preempting Attacks against Supercomputing Infrastructure [1.9097277955963794]
  This paper describes a security testbed embedded in live traffic of a supercomputer at the National Center for Supercomputing Applications. The objective is to demonstrate attack textitpreemption, i.e., stopping system compromise and data breaches at petascale supercomputers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-15T03:42:47Z)
• Cabin: Confining Untrusted Programs within Confidential VMs [13.022056111810599]
  Confidential computing safeguards sensitive computations from untrusted clouds. CVMs often come with large and vulnerable operating system kernels, making them susceptible to attacks exploiting kernel weaknesses. This study proposes Cabin, an isolated execution framework within guest VM utilizing the latest AMD SEV-SNP technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T06:23:28Z)
• Adversarial Attacks on Multimodal Agents [73.97379283655127]
  Vision-enabled language models (VLMs) are now used to build autonomous multimodal agents capable of taking actions in real environments. We show that multimodal agents raise new safety risks, even though attacking agents is more challenging than prior attacks due to limited access to and knowledge about the environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T17:32:48Z)
• Dynamic Frequency-Based Fingerprinting Attacks against Modern Sandbox Environments [7.753621963239778]
  We investigate the possibility of fingerprinting containers through CPU frequency reporting sensors in Intel and AMD CPUs. We demonstrate that Docker images exhibit a unique frequency signature, enabling the distinction of different containers with up to 84.5% accuracy. Our empirical results show that these attacks can also be carried out successfully against all of these sandboxes in less than 40 seconds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T16:45:47Z)
• Heckler: Breaking Confidential VMs with Malicious Interrupts [2.650561978417805]
  Heckler is a new attack wherein the hypervisor injects malicious non-timer interrupts to break the confidentiality and integrity of CVMs. With AMD SEV-SNP and Intel TDX, we demonstrate Heckler on OpenSSH and to bypass authentication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T11:37:59Z)
• Putting a Padlock on Lambda -- Integrating vTPMs into AWS Firecracker [49.1574468325115]
  Software services place implicit trust in the cloud provider, without an explicit trust relationship. There is currently no cloud provider that exposes Trusted Platform Module capabilities. We improve trust by integrating a virtual TPM device into the Firecracker, originally developed by Amazon Web Services.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T13:13:55Z)
• DRSM: De-Randomized Smoothing on Malware Classifier Providing Certified Robustness [58.23214712926585]
  We develop a certified defense, DRSM (De-Randomized Smoothed MalConv), by redesigning the de-randomized smoothing technique for the domain of malware detection. Specifically, we propose a window ablation scheme to provably limit the impact of adversarial bytes while maximally preserving local structures of the executables. We are the first to offer certified robustness in the realm of static detection of malware executables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T17:25:22Z)
• Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injection [64.67495502772866]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being integrated into various applications. We show how attackers can override original instructions and employed controls using Prompt Injection attacks. We derive a comprehensive taxonomy from a computer security perspective to systematically investigate impacts and vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T17:14:38Z)
• Few-Shot Backdoor Attacks on Visual Object Tracking [80.13936562708426]
  Visual object tracking (VOT) has been widely adopted in mission-critical applications, such as autonomous driving and intelligent surveillance systems. We show that an adversary can easily implant hidden backdoors into VOT models by tempering with the training process. We show that our attack is resistant to potential defenses, highlighting the vulnerability of VOT models to potential backdoor attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-31T12:38:58Z)
• Adversarial EXEmples: A Survey and Experimental Evaluation of Practical Attacks on Machine Learning for Windows Malware Detection [67.53296659361598]
  adversarial EXEmples can bypass machine learning-based detection by perturbing relatively few input bytes. We develop a unifying framework that does not only encompass and generalize previous attacks against machine-learning models, but also includes three novel attacks. These attacks, named Full DOS, Extend and Shift, inject the adversarial payload by respectively manipulating the DOS header, extending it, and shifting the content of the first section.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-17T07:16:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.