Transfer Learning between Motor Imagery Datasets using Deep Learning -- Validation of Framework and Comparison of Datasets

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.16109v1
• Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 20:58:57 GMT
• Title: Transfer Learning between Motor Imagery Datasets using Deep Learning -- Validation of Framework and Comparison of Datasets
• Authors: Pierre Guetschel, Michael Tangermann
• Abstract summary: We present a simple deep learning-based framework commonly used in computer vision. We demonstrate its effectiveness for cross-dataset transfer learning in mental imagery decoding tasks.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We present a simple deep learning-based framework commonly used in computer vision and demonstrate its effectiveness for cross-dataset transfer learning in mental imagery decoding tasks that are common in the field of Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI). We investigate, on a large selection of 12 motor-imagery datasets, which ones are well suited for transfer, both as donors and as receivers. Challenges. Deep learning models typically require long training times and are data-hungry, which impedes their use for BCI systems that have to minimize the recording time for (training) examples and are subject to constraints induced by experiments involving human subjects. A solution to both issues is transfer learning, but it comes with its own challenge, i.e., substantial data distribution shifts between datasets, subjects and even between subsequent sessions of the same subject. Approach. For every pair of pre-training (donor) and test (receiver) dataset, we first train a model on the donor before training merely an additional new linear classification layer based on a few receiver trials. Performance of this transfer approach is then tested on other trials of the receiver dataset. Significance. First, we lower the threshold to use transfer learning between motor imagery datasets: the overall framework is extremely simple and nevertheless obtains decent classification scores. Second, we demonstrate that deep learning models are a good option for motor imagery cross-dataset transfer both for the reasons outlined in the first point and because the framework presented is viable in online scenarios. Finally, analysing which datasets are best suited for transfer learning can be used as a reference for future researchers to determine which to use for pre-training or benchmarking.

Related papers

• Exploring Data Redundancy in Real-world Image Classification through Data Selection [20.389636181891515]
  Deep learning models often require large amounts of data for training, leading to increased costs. We present two data valuation metrics based on Synaptic Intelligence and gradient norms, respectively, to study redundancy in real-world image data. Online and offline data selection algorithms are then proposed via clustering and grouping based on the examined data values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-25T03:31:05Z)
• Convolutional Neural Networks for the classification of glitches in gravitational-wave data streams [52.77024349608834]
  We classify transient noise signals (i.e.glitches) and gravitational waves in data from the Advanced LIGO detectors. We use models with a supervised learning approach, both trained from scratch using the Gravity Spy dataset. We also explore a self-supervised approach, pre-training models with automatically generated pseudo-labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-24T11:12:37Z)
• Learning from Temporal Spatial Cubism for Cross-Dataset Skeleton-based Action Recognition [88.34182299496074]
  Action labels are only available on a source dataset, but unavailable on a target dataset in the training stage. We utilize a self-supervision scheme to reduce the domain shift between two skeleton-based action datasets. By segmenting and permuting temporal segments or human body parts, we design two self-supervised learning classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-17T07:05:39Z)
• 2021 BEETL Competition: Advancing Transfer Learning for Subject Independence & Heterogenous EEG Data Sets [89.84774119537087]
  We design two transfer learning challenges around diagnostics and Brain-Computer-Interfacing (BCI) Task 1 is centred on medical diagnostics, addressing automatic sleep stage annotation across subjects. Task 2 is centred on Brain-Computer Interfacing (BCI), addressing motor imagery decoding across both subjects and data sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-14T12:12:20Z)
• Intra-domain and cross-domain transfer learning for time series data -- How transferable are the features? [0.0]
  This study aims to assess how transferable are the features between different domains of time series data. The effects of transfer learning are observed in terms of predictive performance of the models and their convergence rate during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-12T12:55:21Z)
• How Well Do Sparse Imagenet Models Transfer? [75.98123173154605]
  Transfer learning is a classic paradigm by which models pretrained on large "upstream" datasets are adapted to yield good results on "downstream" datasets. In this work, we perform an in-depth investigation of this phenomenon in the context of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) trained on the ImageNet dataset. We show that sparse models can match or even outperform the transfer performance of dense models, even at high sparsities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-26T11:58:51Z)
• Transformer-Based Behavioral Representation Learning Enables Transfer Learning for Mobile Sensing in Small Datasets [4.276883061502341]
  We provide a neural architecture framework for mobile sensing data that can learn generalizable feature representations from time series. This architecture combines benefits from CNN and Trans-former architectures to enable better prediction performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-09T22:26:50Z)
• A Systematic Evaluation of Domain Adaptation in Facial Expression Recognition [0.0]
  This paper provides a systematic evaluation of domain adaptation in facial expression recognition. We use state-of-the-art transfer learning techniques and six commonly-used facial expression datasets. We find sobering results that the accuracy of transfer learning is not high, and varies idiosyncratically with the target dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-29T14:41:19Z)
• Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better? [102.09335596483695]
  adversarially robust models often perform better than their standard-trained counterparts when used for transfer learning. Our results are consistent with (and in fact, add to) recent hypotheses stating that robustness leads to improved feature representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-16T17:42:40Z)
• A Survey on Self-supervised Pre-training for Sequential Transfer Learning in Neural Networks [1.1802674324027231]
  Self-supervised pre-training for transfer learning is becoming an increasingly popular technique to improve state-of-the-art results using unlabeled data. We provide an overview of the taxonomy for self-supervised learning and transfer learning, and highlight some prominent methods for designing pre-training tasks across different domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-01T22:55:48Z)
• Omni-supervised Facial Expression Recognition via Distilled Data [120.11782405714234]
  We propose omni-supervised learning to exploit reliable samples in a large amount of unlabeled data for network training. We experimentally verify that the new dataset can significantly improve the ability of the learned FER model. To tackle this, we propose to apply a dataset distillation strategy to compress the created dataset into several informative class-wise images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-18T09:36:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.