SAIBench: A Structural Interpretation of AI for Science Through Benchmarks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.17869v1
• Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 18:17:35 GMT
• Title: SAIBench: A Structural Interpretation of AI for Science Through Benchmarks
• Authors: Yatao Li, Jianfeng Zhan
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces a novel benchmarking approach, known as structural interpretation. It addresses two key requirements: identifying the trusted operating range in the problem space and tracing errors back to their computational components. The practical utility and effectiveness of structural interpretation are illustrated through its application to three distinct AI4S workloads.
• Score: 2.6159098238462817
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Artificial Intelligence for Science (AI4S) is an emerging research field that utilizes machine learning advancements to tackle complex scientific computational issues, aiming to enhance computational efficiency and accuracy. However, the data-driven nature of AI4S lacks the correctness or accuracy assurances of conventional scientific computing, posing challenges when deploying AI4S models in real-world applications. To mitigate these, more comprehensive benchmarking procedures are needed to better understand AI4S models. This paper introduces a novel benchmarking approach, known as structural interpretation, which addresses two key requirements: identifying the trusted operating range in the problem space and tracing errors back to their computational components. This method partitions both the problem and metric spaces, facilitating a structural exploration of these spaces. The practical utility and effectiveness of structural interpretation are illustrated through its application to three distinct AI4S workloads: machine-learning force fields (MLFF), jet tagging, and precipitation nowcasting. The benchmarks effectively model the trusted operating range, trace errors, and reveal novel perspectives for refining the model, training process, and data sampling strategy. This work is part of the SAIBench project, an AI4S benchmarking suite.

Related papers

• ML Research Benchmark [0.0]
  We present the ML Research Benchmark (MLRB), comprising 7 competition-level tasks derived from recent machine learning conference tracks. This paper introduces a novel benchmark and evaluates it using agent scaffolds powered by frontier models, including Claude-3 and GPT-4o. The results indicate that the Claude-3.5 Sonnet agent performs best across our benchmark, excelling in planning and developing machine learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T21:38:42Z)
• Architectural Flaw Detection in Civil Engineering Using GPT-4 [0.8463972278020965]
  This paper investigates the potential of the advanced LLM GPT4 Turbo vision model in detecting architectural flaws during the design phase. The study evaluates the model's performance through metrics such as precision, recall, and F1 score. The findings highlight how AI can significantly improve design accuracy, reduce costly revisions, and support sustainable practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-26T01:10:04Z)
• Adaptation of XAI to Auto-tuning for Numerical Libraries [0.0]
  Explainable AI (XAI) technology is gaining prominence, aiming to streamline AI model development and alleviate the burden of explaining AI outputs to users. This research focuses on XAI for AI models when integrated into two different processes for practical numerical computations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-12T09:00:56Z)
• Pangu-Agent: A Fine-Tunable Generalist Agent with Structured Reasoning [50.47568731994238]
  Key method for creating Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents is Reinforcement Learning (RL) This paper presents a general framework model for integrating and learning structured reasoning into AI agents' policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T17:57:57Z)
• A Discrepancy Aware Framework for Robust Anomaly Detection [51.710249807397695]
  We present a Discrepancy Aware Framework (DAF), which demonstrates robust performance consistently with simple and cheap strategies. Our method leverages an appearance-agnostic cue to guide the decoder in identifying defects, thereby alleviating its reliance on synthetic appearance. Under the simple synthesis strategies, it outperforms existing methods by a large margin. Furthermore, it also achieves the state-of-the-art localization performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T15:21:40Z)
• A Comprehensive Performance Study of Large Language Models on Novel AI Accelerators [2.88634411143577]
  Large language models (LLMs) are being considered as a promising approach to address some of the challenging problems. Specialized AI accelerator hardware systems have recently become available for accelerating AI applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T21:55:57Z)
• Does AI for science need another ImageNet Or totally different benchmarks? A case study of machine learning force fields [5.622820801789953]
  AI for science (AI4S) aims to enhance the accuracy and speed of scientific computing tasks using machine learning methods. Traditional AI benchmarking methods struggle to adapt to the unique challenges posed by AI4S because they assume data in training, testing, and future real-world queries are independent and identically distributed. This paper investigates the need for a novel approach to effectively benchmark AI for science, using the machine learning force field (MLFF) as a case study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-11T08:06:58Z)
• A LLM Assisted Exploitation of AI-Guardian [57.572998144258705]
  We evaluate the robustness of AI-Guardian, a recent defense to adversarial examples published at IEEE S&P 2023. We write none of the code to attack this model, and instead prompt GPT-4 to implement all attack algorithms following our instructions and guidance. This process was surprisingly effective and efficient, with the language model at times producing code from ambiguous instructions faster than the author of this paper could have done.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T17:33:25Z)
• Can GPT-4 Perform Neural Architecture Search? [56.98363718371614]
  We investigate the potential of GPT-4 to perform Neural Architecture Search (NAS) Our proposed approach, textbfGPT-4 textbfEnhanced textbfNeural archtextbfItecttextbfUre textbfSearch (GENIUS) We assess GENIUS across several benchmarks, comparing it with existing state-of-the-art NAS techniques to illustrate its effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T14:06:44Z)
• INTERACTION: A Generative XAI Framework for Natural Language Inference Explanations [58.062003028768636]
  Current XAI approaches only focus on delivering a single explanation. This paper proposes a generative XAI framework, INTERACTION (explaIn aNd predicT thEn queRy with contextuAl CondiTional varIational autO-eNcoder) Our novel framework presents explanation in two steps: (step one) Explanation and Label Prediction; and (step two) Diverse Evidence Generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-02T13:52:39Z)
• SOLIS -- The MLOps journey from data acquisition to actionable insights [62.997667081978825]
  In this paper we present a unified deployment pipeline and freedom-to-operate approach that supports all requirements while using basic cross-platform tensor framework and script language engines. This approach however does not supply the needed procedures and pipelines for the actual deployment of machine learning capabilities in real production grade systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-22T14:45:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.