Large Language Models for Travel Behavior Prediction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.00819v1
• Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 04:35:55 GMT
• Title: Large Language Models for Travel Behavior Prediction
• Authors: Baichuan Mo, Hanyong Xu, Dingyi Zhuang, Ruoyun Ma, Xiaotong Guo, Jinhua Zhao
• Abstract summary: We propose to use large language models to predict travel behavior with prompt engineering without data-based parameter learning. Specifically, we carefully design our prompts that include 1) task description, 2) travel characteristics, 3) individual attributes, and 4) guides of thinking with domain knowledge. Results show that, though no training samples are provided, LLM-based predictions have competitive accuracy and F1-score as canonical supervised learning methods.
• Score: 8.069026355648049
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Travel behavior prediction is a fundamental task in transportation demand management. The conventional methods for travel behavior prediction rely on numerical data to construct mathematical models and calibrate model parameters to represent human preferences. Recent advancement in large language models (LLMs) has shown great reasoning abilities to solve complex problems. In this study, we propose to use LLMs to predict travel behavior with prompt engineering without data-based parameter learning. Specifically, we carefully design our prompts that include 1) task description, 2) travel characteristics, 3) individual attributes, and 4) guides of thinking with domain knowledge, and ask the LLMs to predict an individual's travel behavior and explain the results. We select the travel mode choice task as a case study. Results show that, though no training samples are provided, LLM-based predictions have competitive accuracy and F1-score as canonical supervised learning methods such as multinomial logit, random forest, and neural networks. LLMs can also output reasons that support their prediction. However, though in most of the cases, the output explanations are reasonable, we still observe cases that violate logic or with hallucinations.

Related papers

• Unforgettable Generalization in Language Models [46.98652406155007]
  We study the behavior of language models (LMs) in which tasks have been forgotten via fine-tuning on randomized labels. Across tasks, however, LMs exhibit extreme variability in whether LM predictions change on examples outside the training set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-03T18:55:54Z)
• LLM-Select: Feature Selection with Large Language Models [64.5099482021597]
  Large language models (LLMs) are capable of selecting the most predictive features, with performance rivaling the standard tools of data science. Our findings suggest that LLMs may be useful not only for selecting the best features for training but also for deciding which features to collect in the first place.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T22:23:40Z)
• Enhancing Travel Choice Modeling with Large Language Models: A Prompt-Learning Approach [6.913791588789051]
  We introduce a novel prompt-learning-based Large Language Model(LLM) framework that significantly improves prediction accuracy and provides explicit explanations for individual predictions. We tested the framework's efficacy using two widely used choice datasets: London Passenger Mode Choice (LPMC) and Optima-Mode collected in Switzerland. The results indicate that the LLM significantly outperforms state-of-the-art deep learning methods and discrete choice models in predicting people's choices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T13:46:08Z)
• LLM Processes: Numerical Predictive Distributions Conditioned on Natural Language [35.84181171987974]
  Our goal is to build a regression model that can process numerical data and make probabilistic predictions at arbitrary locations. We start by exploring strategies for eliciting explicit, coherent numerical predictive distributions from Large Language Models. We demonstrate the ability to usefully incorporate text into numerical predictions, improving predictive performance and giving quantitative structure that reflects qualitative descriptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T15:13:12Z)
• Learning to Generate Explainable Stock Predictions using Self-Reflective Large Language Models [54.21695754082441]
  We propose a framework to teach Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate explainable stock predictions. A reflective agent learns how to explain past stock movements through self-reasoning, while the PPO trainer trains the model to generate the most likely explanations. Our framework can outperform both traditional deep-learning and LLM methods in prediction accuracy and Matthews correlation coefficient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T03:18:58Z)
• Where Would I Go Next? Large Language Models as Human Mobility Predictors [21.100313868232995]
  We introduce a novel method, LLM-Mob, which leverages the language understanding and reasoning capabilities of LLMs for analysing human mobility data. Comprehensive evaluations of our method reveal that LLM-Mob excels in providing accurate and interpretable predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-29T10:24:23Z)
• Evaluating and Explaining Large Language Models for Code Using Syntactic Structures [74.93762031957883]
  This paper introduces ASTxplainer, an explainability method specific to Large Language Models for code. At its core, ASTxplainer provides an automated method for aligning token predictions with AST nodes. We perform an empirical evaluation on 12 popular LLMs for code using a curated dataset of the most popular GitHub projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T18:50:57Z)
• Making Pre-trained Language Models both Task-solvers and Self-calibrators [52.98858650625623]
  Pre-trained language models (PLMs) serve as backbones for various real-world systems. Previous work shows that introducing an extra calibration task can mitigate this issue. We propose a training algorithm LM-TOAST to tackle the challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-21T02:51:41Z)
• Rationalizing Predictions by Adversarial Information Calibration [65.19407304154177]
  We train two models jointly: one is a typical neural model that solves the task at hand in an accurate but black-box manner, and the other is a selector-predictor model that additionally produces a rationale for its prediction. We use an adversarial technique to calibrate the information extracted by the two models such that the difference between them is an indicator of the missed or over-selected features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-15T03:13:09Z)
• Learning from the Best: Rationalizing Prediction by Adversarial Information Calibration [39.685626118667074]
  We train two models jointly: one is a typical neural model that solves the task at hand in an accurate but black-box manner, and the other is a selector-predictor model that additionally produces a rationale for its prediction. We use an adversarial-based technique to calibrate the information extracted by the two models. For natural language tasks, we propose to use a language-model-based regularizer to encourage the extraction of fluent rationales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-16T11:54:15Z)
• An Information-Theoretic Approach to Personalized Explainable Machine Learning [92.53970625312665]
  We propose a simple probabilistic model for the predictions and user knowledge. We quantify the effect of an explanation by the conditional mutual information between the explanation and prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-01T13:06:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.