When it Rains, it Pours: Modeling Media Storms and the News Ecosystem
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.02118v1
- Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 18:49:06 GMT
- Title: When it Rains, it Pours: Modeling Media Storms and the News Ecosystem
- Abstract summary: We create a comprehensive corpus of media storms over a nearly two year period.
We validate claims about storm evolution and topical distribution.
We provide empirical support for previously hypothesized patterns of influence of storms on media coverage and intermedia agenda setting.
- Score: 26.645261253849117
- License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Abstract: Most events in the world receive at most brief coverage by the news media.
Occasionally, however, an event will trigger a media storm, with voluminous and
widespread coverage lasting for weeks instead of days. In this work, we develop
and apply a pairwise article similarity model, allowing us to identify story
clusters in corpora covering local and national online news, and thereby create
a comprehensive corpus of media storms over a nearly two year period. Using
this corpus, we investigate media storms at a new level of granularity,
allowing us to validate claims about storm evolution and topical distribution,
and provide empirical support for previously hypothesized patterns of influence
of storms on media coverage and intermedia agenda setting.
Related papers
- The Media Bias Detector: A Framework for Annotating and Analyzing the News at Scale [24.955234806377643]
We introduce a large, ongoing, near real-time dataset and computational framework to study selection and framing bias in news coverage.<n>Our pipeline integrates large language models with scalable, near-real-time news scraping to extract structured annotations.<n>We quantify these dimensions of coverage at multiple levels -- the sentence level, the article level, and the publisher level.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-30T01:41:49Z) - Reap the Wild Wind: Detecting Media Storms in Large-Scale News Corpora [2.249916681499244]
We introduce an iterative human-in-the-loop method to identify media storms in a large-scale corpus of news articles.
We demonstrate the applicability of this method in two scenarios: first, supplementing an initial list of media storms within a specific time frame; and second, detecting media storms in new time periods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-14T16:47:38Z) - CrisisMatch: Semi-Supervised Few-Shot Learning for Fine-Grained Disaster
Tweet Classification [51.58605842457186]
We present a fine-grained disaster tweet classification model under the semi-supervised, few-shot learning setting.
Our model, CrisisMatch, effectively classifies tweets into fine-grained classes of interest using few labeled data and large amounts of unlabeled data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-23T07:01:09Z) - Towards Corpus-Scale Discovery of Selection Biases in News Coverage:
Comparing What Sources Say About Entities as a Start [65.28355014154549]
This paper investigates the challenges of building scalable NLP systems for discovering patterns of media selection biases directly from news content in massive-scale news corpora.
We show the capabilities of the framework through a case study on NELA-2020, a corpus of 1.8M news articles in English from 519 news sources worldwide.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-06T23:36:45Z) - Bias or Diversity? Unraveling Fine-Grained Thematic Discrepancy in U.S.
News Headlines [63.52264764099532]
We use a large dataset of 1.8 million news headlines from major U.S. media outlets spanning from 2014 to 2022.
We quantify the fine-grained thematic discrepancy related to four prominent topics - domestic politics, economic issues, social issues, and foreign affairs.
Our findings indicate that on domestic politics and social issues, the discrepancy can be attributed to a certain degree of media bias.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-28T03:31:37Z) - Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases.
We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions.
Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z) - Uncovering the structure of the French media ecosystem [0.0]
We collect data about the production and circulation of online news stories in France over the course of one year.
A block model of the structure shows the systematic rejection of counter-informational press in a separate cluster.
We conclude that the French media ecosystem does not suffer from the same level of polarization as the US media ecosystem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-26T09:51:54Z) - Misinfo Belief Frames: A Case Study on Covid & Climate News [49.979419711713795]
We propose a formalism for understanding how readers perceive the reliability of news and the impact of misinformation.
We introduce the Misinfo Belief Frames (MBF) corpus, a dataset of 66k inferences over 23.5k headlines.
Our results using large-scale language modeling to predict misinformation frames show that machine-generated inferences can influence readers' trust in news headlines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-18T09:50:11Z) - News Information Decoupling: An Information Signature of Catastrophes in
Legacy News Media [0.0]
During the first half of 2020, legacy news media became "corona news" following national outbreak and crises management patterns.
We use legacy print media to empirically derive the principle News Information Decoupling (NID) that functions as an information signature of culturally significant catastrophic event.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-08T10:56:30Z) - Fake news agenda in the era of COVID-19: Identifying trends through
fact-checking content [0.8594140167290099]
We introduce a novel Markov-inspired computational method for identifying topics in tweets.
We collected data from Twitter accounts of two Brazilian fact-checking outlets.
Our method resulted in an important technique to cluster topics in a wide range of scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-20T19:35:25Z) - A Systematic Media Frame Analysis of 1.5 Million New York Times Articles
from 2000 to 2017 [9.304337244850773]
We develop a media frame classifier to analyze the media frames of 1.5 million New York Times articles published from 2000 to 2017.
We show that short-term frame abundance closely corresponds to major events, while there also exist several long-term trends.
As a case study, we delve into the framing of mass shootings, revealing three major framing patterns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-04T19:25:39Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.