Enhancing Content Moderation with Culturally-Aware Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.02401v2
• Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 22:33:52 GMT
• Title: Enhancing Content Moderation with Culturally-Aware Models
• Authors: Alex J. Chan, José Luis Redondo García, Fabrizio Silvestri, Colm O'Donnell, Konstantina Palla,
• Abstract summary: This work introduces a flexible framework that enhances foundation language models with cultural knowledge. We evaluate this framework in a case study of an online podcast platform with content spanning various regions.
• Score: 9.890160776193616
• License:
• Abstract: Content moderation on a global scale must navigate a complex array of local cultural distinctions, which can hinder effective enforcement. While global policies aim for consistency and broad applicability, they often miss the subtleties of regional language interpretation, cultural beliefs, and local legislation. This work introduces a flexible framework that enhances foundation language models with cultural knowledge. Our approach involves fine-tuning encoder-decoder models on media-diet data to capture cultural nuances, and applies a continued training regime to effectively integrate these models into a content moderation pipeline. We evaluate this framework in a case study of an online podcast platform with content spanning various regions. The results show that our culturally adapted models improve the accuracy of local violation detection and offer explanations that align more closely with regional cultural norms. Our findings reinforce the need for an adaptable content moderation approach that remains flexible in response to the diverse cultural landscapes it operates in and represents a step towards a more equitable and culturally sensitive framework for content moderation, demonstrating what is achievable in this domain.

Related papers

• CROPE: Evaluating In-Context Adaptation of Vision and Language Models to Culture-Specific Concepts [45.77570690529597]
  We introduce CROPE, a visual question answering benchmark designed to probe the knowledge of culture-specific concepts. Our evaluation of several state-of-the-art open Vision and Language models shows large performance disparities between culture-specific and common concepts. Experiments with contextual knowledge indicate that models struggle to effectively utilize multimodal information and bind culture-specific concepts to their depictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T17:31:19Z)
• Navigating the Cultural Kaleidoscope: A Hitchhiker's Guide to Sensitivity in Large Language Models [4.771099208181585]
  LLMs are increasingly deployed in global applications, ensuring users from diverse backgrounds feel respected and understood. Cultural harm can arise when these models fail to align with specific cultural norms, resulting in misrepresentations or violations of cultural values. We present two key contributions: A cultural harm test dataset, created to assess model outputs across different cultural contexts through scenarios that expose potential cultural insensitivities, and a culturally aligned preference dataset, aimed at restoring cultural sensitivity through fine-tuning based on feedback from diverse annotators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T18:13:10Z)
• From Local Concepts to Universals: Evaluating the Multicultural Understanding of Vision-Language Models [10.121734731147376]
  Vision-language models' performance remains suboptimal on images from non-western cultures. Various benchmarks have been proposed to test models' cultural inclusivity, but they have limited coverage of cultures. We introduce the GlobalRG benchmark, comprising two challenging tasks: retrieval across universals and cultural visual grounding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T23:28:28Z)
• Extrinsic Evaluation of Cultural Competence in Large Language Models [53.626808086522985]
  We focus on extrinsic evaluation of cultural competence in two text generation tasks. We evaluate model outputs when an explicit cue of culture, specifically nationality, is perturbed in the prompts. We find weak correlations between text similarity of outputs for different countries and the cultural values of these countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T14:03:27Z)
• CulturePark: Boosting Cross-cultural Understanding in Large Language Models [63.452948673344395]
  This paper introduces CulturePark, an LLM-powered multi-agent communication framework for cultural data collection. It generates high-quality cross-cultural dialogues encapsulating human beliefs, norms, and customs. We evaluate these models across three downstream tasks: content moderation, cultural alignment, and cultural education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T01:49:02Z)
• Understanding the Capabilities and Limitations of Large Language Models for Cultural Commonsense [98.09670425244462]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated substantial commonsense understanding. This paper examines the capabilities and limitations of several state-of-the-art LLMs in the context of cultural commonsense tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T20:28:34Z)
• CRAFT: Extracting and Tuning Cultural Instructions from the Wild [38.255242754975654]
  This paper introduces a novel pipeline for extracting high-quality, culturally-related instruction tuning datasets from vast unstructured corpora. We utilize a self-instruction generation pipeline to identify cultural concepts and trigger instruction. We conduct experiments across three regions: Singapore, the Philippines, and the United States, achieving performance improvement of up to 6%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-06T03:21:55Z)
• Massively Multi-Cultural Knowledge Acquisition & LM Benchmarking [48.21982147529661]
  This paper introduces a novel approach for massively multicultural knowledge acquisition. Our method strategically navigates from densely informative Wikipedia documents on cultural topics to an extensive network of linked pages. Our work marks an important step towards deeper understanding and bridging the gaps of cultural disparities in AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T18:16:54Z)
• Not All Countries Celebrate Thanksgiving: On the Cultural Dominance in Large Language Models [89.94270049334479]
  This paper identifies a cultural dominance issue within large language models (LLMs) LLMs often provide inappropriate English-culture-related answers that are not relevant to the expected culture when users ask in non-English languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T05:38:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.