ULMA: Unified Language Model Alignment with Human Demonstration and Point-wise Preference

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.02554v2
• Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 08:51:03 GMT
• Title: ULMA: Unified Language Model Alignment with Human Demonstration and Point-wise Preference
• Authors: Tianchi Cai, Xierui Song, Jiyan Jiang, Fei Teng, Jinjie Gu, Guannan Zhang
• Abstract summary: A typical alignment procedure consists of supervised fine-tuning and preference learning. We introduce Point-wise Direct Preference Optimization, a novel preference learning method designed to harness point-wise feedback effectively. Our work also uncovers a novel connection between supervised fine-tuning and point-wise preference learning, culminating in Unified Language Model Alignment.
• Score: 16.73260713938154
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Aligning language models to human expectations, e.g., being helpful and harmless, has become a pressing challenge for large language models. A typical alignment procedure consists of supervised fine-tuning and preference learning. Most preference learning methods, such as RLHF and DPO, depend on pairwise preference data, which inadequately address scenarios where human feedback is point-wise, leading to potential information loss and suboptimal performance. Addressing this gap, we introduce Point-wise Direct Preference Optimization, a novel preference learning method designed to harness point-wise feedback effectively. Our work also uncovers a novel connection between supervised fine-tuning and point-wise preference learning, culminating in Unified Language Model Alignment, a single-step method that unifies the alignment with human demonstrations and point-wise preferences. Extensive experiments on point-wise preference datasets with binary or continuous labels validate the effectiveness of our methods. Our code and a new dataset with high-quality demonstration samples on harmlessness are released.

Related papers

• Aligning Visual Contrastive learning models via Preference Optimization [0.9438963196770565]
  This paper introduces a novel method for training contrastive learning models using Preference Optimization (PO) to break down complex concepts. Our method systematically aligns model behavior with desired preferences, enhancing performance on the targeted task. In particular, we focus on enhancing model robustness against typographic attacks, commonly seen in contrastive models like CLIP. We further apply our method to disentangle gender understanding and mitigate gender biases, offering a more nuanced control over these sensitive attributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T08:14:54Z)
• Hybrid Preferences: Learning to Route Instances for Human vs. AI Feedback [87.37721254914476]
  We introduce a routing framework that combines inputs from humans and LMs to achieve better annotation quality. We train a performance prediction model to predict a reward model's performance on an arbitrary combination of human and LM annotations. We show that the selected hybrid mixture achieves better reward model performance compared to using either one exclusively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T20:04:15Z)
• Investigating on RLHF methodology [0.0]
  We discuss the features of training a Preference Model, which simulates human preferences, and the methods and details we found essential for achieving the best results. We also discuss using Reinforcement Learning to fine-tune Large Language Models and describe the challenges we faced and the ways to overcome them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T17:46:22Z)
• Less for More: Enhancing Preference Learning in Generative Language Models with Automated Self-Curation of Training Corpora [4.008122785948581]
  Ambiguity in language presents challenges in developing more enhanced language models. We introduce a self-curation method that preprocesses annotated datasets by leveraging proxy models trained directly on these datasets. Our method enhances preference learning by automatically detecting and removing ambiguous annotations within the dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-23T02:27:14Z)
• Aligning Large Language Models with Self-generated Preference Data [72.99676237703099]
  We propose a new framework that boosts the alignment of large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. Our key idea is leveraging the human prior knowledge within the small (seed) data. We introduce a noise-aware preference learning algorithm to mitigate the risk of low quality within generated preference data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T18:01:02Z)
• MaxMin-RLHF: Towards Equitable Alignment of Large Language Models with Diverse Human Preferences [101.57443597426374]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) aligns language models to human preferences by employing a singular reward model derived from preference data. We learn a mixture of preference distributions via an expectation-maximization algorithm to better represent diverse human preferences. Our algorithm achieves an average improvement of more than 16% in win-rates over conventional RLHF algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T03:56:27Z)
• Active Preference Learning for Large Language Models [12.093302163058436]
  We develop an active learning strategy for DPO to make better use of preference labels. We propose a practical acquisition function for prompt/completion pairs based on the predictive entropy of the language model. We demonstrate how our approach improves both the rate of learning and final performance of fine-tuning on pairwise preference data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T23:09:00Z)
• Linear Alignment: A Closed-form Solution for Aligning Human Preferences without Tuning and Feedback [70.32795295142648]
  Linear alignment is a novel algorithm that aligns language models with human preferences in one single inference step. Experiments on both general and personalized preference datasets demonstrate that linear alignment significantly enhances the performance and efficiency of LLM alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-21T10:46:23Z)
• Constructive Large Language Models Alignment with Diverse Feedback [76.9578950893839]
  We introduce Constructive and Diverse Feedback (CDF) as a novel method to enhance large language models alignment. We exploit critique feedback for easy problems, refinement feedback for medium problems, and preference feedback for hard problems. By training our model with this diversified feedback, we achieve enhanced alignment performance while using less training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T09:20:14Z)
• Chain of Hindsight Aligns Language Models with Feedback [62.68665658130472]
  We propose a novel technique, Chain of Hindsight, that is easy to optimize and can learn from any form of feedback, regardless of its polarity. We convert all types of feedback into sequences of sentences, which are then used to fine-tune the model. By doing so, the model is trained to generate outputs based on feedback, while learning to identify and correct negative attributes or errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T10:28:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.