How Low Can You Go? Surfacing Prototypical In-Distribution Samples for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.03804v2
• Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 11:08:39 GMT
• Title: How Low Can You Go? Surfacing Prototypical In-Distribution Samples for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection
• Authors: Felix Meissen, Johannes Getzner, Alexander Ziller, Özgün Turgut, Georgios Kaissis, Martin J. Menten, Daniel Rueckert,
• Abstract summary: We show that UAD with extremely few training samples can already match -- and in some cases even surpass -- the performance of training with the whole training dataset. We propose an unsupervised method to reliably identify prototypical samples to further boost UAD performance.
• Score: 48.30283806131551
• License:
• Abstract: Unsupervised anomaly detection (UAD) alleviates large labeling efforts by training exclusively on unlabeled in-distribution data and detecting outliers as anomalies. Generally, the assumption prevails that large training datasets allow the training of higher-performing UAD models. However, in this work, we show that UAD with extremely few training samples can already match -- and in some cases even surpass -- the performance of training with the whole training dataset. Building upon this finding, we propose an unsupervised method to reliably identify prototypical samples to further boost UAD performance. We demonstrate the utility of our method on seven different established UAD benchmarks from computer vision, industrial defect detection, and medicine. With just 25 selected samples, we even exceed the performance of full training in $25/67$ categories in these benchmarks. Additionally, we show that the prototypical in-distribution samples identified by our proposed method generalize well across models and datasets and that observing their sample selection criteria allows for a successful manual selection of small subsets of high-performing samples. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/uad_prototypical_samples/

Related papers

• Enhancing Sample Selection by Cutting Mislabeled Easy Examples [62.13094877228772]
  We show that mislabeled examples correctly predicted by the model early in the training process are particularly harmful to model performance. We propose Early Cutting, which employs the model's later training state to re-select the confident subset identified early in training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-12T09:12:45Z)
• DOTA: Distributional Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models [52.98590762456236]
  Training-free test-time dynamic adapter (TDA) is a promising approach to address this issue. We propose a simple yet effective method for DistributiOnal Test-time Adaptation (Dota) Dota continually estimates the distributions of test samples, allowing the model to continually adapt to the deployment environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-28T15:03:28Z)
• Semi-Supervised Learning for hyperspectral images by non parametrically predicting view assignment [25.198550162904713]
  Hyperspectral image (HSI) classification is gaining a lot of momentum in present time because of high inherent spectral information within the images. Recently, to effectively train the deep learning models with minimal labelled samples, the unlabeled samples are also being leveraged in self-supervised and semi-supervised setting. In this work, we leverage the idea of semi-supervised learning to assist the discriminative self-supervised pretraining of the models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-19T14:13:56Z)
• POODLE: Improving Few-shot Learning via Penalizing Out-of-Distribution Samples [19.311470287767385]
  We propose to use out-of-distribution samples, i.e., unlabeled samples coming from outside the target classes, to improve few-shot learning. Our approach is simple to implement, agnostic to feature extractors, lightweight without any additional cost for pre-training, and applicable to both inductive and transductive settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T18:59:21Z)
• TTAPS: Test-Time Adaption by Aligning Prototypes using Self-Supervision [70.05605071885914]
  We propose a novel modification of the self-supervised training algorithm SwAV that adds the ability to adapt to single test samples. We show the success of our method on the common benchmark dataset CIFAR10-C.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-18T05:43:06Z)
• One for More: Selecting Generalizable Samples for Generalizable ReID Model [92.40951770273972]
  This paper proposes a one-for-more training objective that takes the generalization ability of selected samples as a loss function. Our proposed one-for-more based sampler can be seamlessly integrated into the ReID training framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T06:37:09Z)
• Understanding Classifier Mistakes with Generative Models [88.20470690631372]
  Deep neural networks are effective on supervised learning tasks, but have been shown to be brittle. In this paper, we leverage generative models to identify and characterize instances where classifiers fail to generalize. Our approach is agnostic to class labels from the training set which makes it applicable to models trained in a semi-supervised way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-05T22:13:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.