Transferable Candidate Proposal with Bounded Uncertainty

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.04604v1
• Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 08:47:28 GMT
• Title: Transferable Candidate Proposal with Bounded Uncertainty
• Authors: Kyeongryeol Go, Kye-Hyeon Kim
• Abstract summary: We introduce a new experimental design, coined as Proposal Candidate, to find transferable data candidates. A data selection algorithm is proposed, namely Transferable candidate proposal with Bounded Uncertainty (TBU) When transferred to different model configurations, TBU consistency improves performance in existing active learning algorithms.
• Score: 1.8130068086063336
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: From an empirical perspective, the subset chosen through active learning cannot guarantee an advantage over random sampling when transferred to another model. While it underscores the significance of verifying transferability, experimental design from previous works often neglected that the informativeness of a data subset can change over model configurations. To tackle this issue, we introduce a new experimental design, coined as Candidate Proposal, to find transferable data candidates from which active learning algorithms choose the informative subset. Correspondingly, a data selection algorithm is proposed, namely Transferable candidate proposal with Bounded Uncertainty (TBU), which constrains the pool of transferable data candidates by filtering out the presumably redundant data points based on uncertainty estimation. We verified the validity of TBU in image classification benchmarks, including CIFAR-10/100 and SVHN. When transferred to different model configurations, TBU consistency improves performance in existing active learning algorithms. Our code is available at https://github.com/gokyeongryeol/TBU.

Related papers

• Downstream-Pretext Domain Knowledge Traceback for Active Learning [138.02530777915362]
  We propose a downstream-pretext domain knowledge traceback (DOKT) method that traces the data interactions of downstream knowledge and pre-training guidance. DOKT consists of a traceback diversity indicator and a domain-based uncertainty estimator. Experiments conducted on ten datasets show that our model outperforms other state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-20T01:34:13Z)
• Diverse Data Augmentation with Diffusions for Effective Test-time Prompt Tuning [73.75282761503581]
  We propose DiffTPT, which leverages pre-trained diffusion models to generate diverse and informative new data. Our experiments on test datasets with distribution shifts and unseen categories demonstrate that DiffTPT improves the zero-shot accuracy by an average of 5.13%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-11T09:36:31Z)
• Efficient Failure Pattern Identification of Predictive Algorithms [15.02620042972929]
  We propose a human-machine collaborative framework that consists of a team of human annotators and a sequential recommendation algorithm. The results empirically demonstrate the competitive performance of our framework on multiple datasets at various signal-to-noise ratios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T14:54:42Z)
• Robust Outlier Rejection for 3D Registration with Variational Bayes [70.98659381852787]
  We develop a novel variational non-local network-based outlier rejection framework for robust alignment. We propose a voting-based inlier searching strategy to cluster the high-quality hypothetical inliers for transformation estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T03:48:56Z)
• Rethinking Precision of Pseudo Label: Test-Time Adaptation via Complementary Learning [10.396596055773012]
  We propose a novel complementary learning approach to enhance test-time adaptation. In test-time adaptation tasks, information from the source domain is typically unavailable. We highlight that the risk function of complementary labels agrees with their Vanilla loss formula.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-15T03:36:33Z)
• Data Lifecycle Management in Evolving Input Distributions for Learning-based Aerospace Applications [23.84037777018747]
  This paper presents a framework to incrementally retrain a model by selecting a subset of test inputs to label. Algorithms within this framework are evaluated based on (1) model performance throughout mission lifetime and (2) cumulative costs associated with labeling and model retraining.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-14T18:15:56Z)
• Stream-based active learning with linear models [0.7734726150561089]
  In production, instead of performing random inspections to obtain product information, labels are collected by evaluating the information content of the unlabeled data. We propose a new strategy for the stream-based scenario, where instances are sequentially offered to the learner. The iterative aspect of the decision-making process is tackled by setting a threshold on the informativeness of the unlabeled data points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T13:15:23Z)
• "Diversity and Uncertainty in Moderation" are the Key to Data Selection for Multilingual Few-shot Transfer [13.268758633770595]
  This paper explores various strategies for selecting data for annotation that can result in a better few-shot transfer. The proposed approaches rely on multiple measures such as data entropy using $n$-gram language model, predictive entropy, and gradient embedding. Experiments show that the gradient and loss embedding-based strategies consistently outperform random data selection baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T04:22:27Z)
• CAFA: Class-Aware Feature Alignment for Test-Time Adaptation [50.26963784271912]
  Test-time adaptation (TTA) aims to address this challenge by adapting a model to unlabeled data at test time. We propose a simple yet effective feature alignment loss, termed as Class-Aware Feature Alignment (CAFA), which simultaneously encourages a model to learn target representations in a class-discriminative manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T03:02:07Z)
• Agree to Disagree: Diversity through Disagreement for Better Transferability [54.308327969778155]
  We propose D-BAT (Diversity-By-disAgreement Training), which enforces agreement among the models on the training data. We show how D-BAT naturally emerges from the notion of generalized discrepancy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-09T12:03:02Z)
• Online Active Model Selection for Pre-trained Classifiers [72.84853880948894]
  We design an online selective sampling approach that actively selects informative examples to label and outputs the best model with high probability at any round. Our algorithm can be used for online prediction tasks for both adversarial and streams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T19:53:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.