How to Determine the Most Powerful Pre-trained Language Model without Brute Force Fine-tuning? An Empirical Survey

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.04775v1
• Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 01:17:28 GMT
• Title: How to Determine the Most Powerful Pre-trained Language Model without Brute Force Fine-tuning? An Empirical Survey
• Authors: Jun Bai, Xiaofeng Zhang, Chen Li, Hanhua Hong, Xi Xu, Chenghua Lin, Wenge Rong
• Abstract summary: We show that H-Score generally performs well with superiorities in effectiveness and efficiency. We also outline the difficulties of consideration of training details, applicability to text generation, and consistency to certain metrics which shed light on future directions.
• Score: 23.757740341834126
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Transferability estimation has been attached to great attention in the computer vision fields. Researchers try to estimate with low computational cost the performance of a model when transferred from a source task to a given target task. Considering the effectiveness of such estimations, the communities of natural language processing also began to study similar problems for the selection of pre-trained language models. However, there is a lack of a comprehensive comparison between these estimation methods yet. Also, the differences between vision and language scenarios make it doubtful whether previous conclusions can be established across fields. In this paper, we first conduct a thorough survey of existing transferability estimation methods being able to find the most suitable model, then we conduct a detailed empirical study for the surveyed methods based on the GLUE benchmark. From qualitative and quantitative analyses, we demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of existing methods and show that H-Score generally performs well with superiorities in effectiveness and efficiency. We also outline the difficulties of consideration of training details, applicability to text generation, and consistency to certain metrics which shed light on future directions.

Related papers

• Training on the Test Task Confounds Evaluation and Emergence [16.32378359459614]
  We show that training on the test task confounds both relative model evaluations and claims about emergent capabilities. We propose an effective method to adjust for training on the test task by fine-tuning each model under comparison on the same task-relevant data before evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-10T17:57:58Z)
• A step towards the integration of machine learning and small area estimation [0.0]
  We propose a predictor supported by machine learning algorithms which can be used to predict any population or subpopulation characteristics. We study only small departures from the assumed model, to show that our proposal is a good alternative in this case as well. What is more, we propose the method of the accuracy estimation of machine learning predictors, giving the possibility of the accuracy comparison with classic methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T09:43:17Z)
• Robust Visual Question Answering: Datasets, Methods, and Future Challenges [23.59923999144776]
  Visual question answering requires a system to provide an accurate natural language answer given an image and a natural language question. Previous generic VQA methods often exhibit a tendency to memorize biases present in the training data rather than learning proper behaviors, such as grounding images before predicting answers. Various datasets and debiasing methods have been proposed to evaluate and enhance the VQA robustness, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-21T10:12:09Z)
• Fairness-guided Few-shot Prompting for Large Language Models [93.05624064699965]
  In-context learning can suffer from high instability due to variations in training examples, example order, and prompt formats. We introduce a metric to evaluate the predictive bias of a fixed prompt against labels or a given attributes. We propose a novel search strategy based on the greedy search to identify the near-optimal prompt for improving the performance of in-context learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-23T12:28:25Z)
• Improving Pre-trained Language Model Fine-tuning with Noise Stability Regularization [94.4409074435894]
  We propose a novel and effective fine-tuning framework, named Layerwise Noise Stability Regularization (LNSR) Specifically, we propose to inject the standard Gaussian noise and regularize hidden representations of the fine-tuned model. We demonstrate the advantages of the proposed method over other state-of-the-art algorithms including L2-SP, Mixout and SMART.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-12T04:42:49Z)
• SUPERB-SG: Enhanced Speech processing Universal PERformance Benchmark for Semantic and Generative Capabilities [76.97949110580703]
  We introduce SUPERB-SG, a new benchmark to evaluate pre-trained models across various speech tasks. We use a lightweight methodology to test the robustness of representations learned by pre-trained models under shifts in data domain. We also show that the task diversity of SUPERB-SG coupled with limited task supervision is an effective recipe for evaluating the generalizability of model representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-14T04:26:40Z)
• Measuring Fairness with Biased Rulers: A Survey on Quantifying Biases in Pretrained Language Models [2.567384209291337]
  An increasing awareness of biased patterns in natural language processing resources has motivated many metrics to quantify bias' and fairness' We survey the existing literature on fairness metrics for pretrained language models and experimentally evaluate compatibility. We find that many metrics are not compatible and highly depend on (i) templates, (ii) attribute and target seeds and (iii) the choice of embeddings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-14T15:04:56Z)
• Self-Normalized Importance Sampling for Neural Language Modeling [97.96857871187052]
  In this work, we propose self-normalized importance sampling. Compared to our previous work, the criteria considered in this work are self-normalized and there is no need to further conduct a correction step. We show that our proposed self-normalized importance sampling is competitive in both research-oriented and production-oriented automatic speech recognition tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-11T16:57:53Z)
• NoiER: An Approach for Training more Reliable Fine-TunedDownstream Task Models [54.184609286094044]
  We propose noise entropy regularisation (NoiER) as an efficient learning paradigm that solves the problem without auxiliary models and additional data. The proposed approach improved traditional OOD detection evaluation metrics by 55% on average compared to the original fine-tuned models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-29T06:58:28Z)
• Language Model Evaluation in Open-ended Text Generation [0.76146285961466]
  We study different evaluation metrics that have been proposed to evaluate quality, diversity and consistency of machine-generated text. From there, we propose a practical pipeline to evaluate language models in open-ended generation task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-08T06:16:02Z)
• Exploring Fine-tuning Techniques for Pre-trained Cross-lingual Models via Continual Learning [74.25168207651376]
  Fine-tuning pre-trained language models to downstream cross-lingual tasks has shown promising results. We leverage continual learning to preserve the cross-lingual ability of the pre-trained model when we fine-tune it to downstream tasks. Our methods achieve better performance than other fine-tuning baselines on the zero-shot cross-lingual part-of-speech tagging and named entity recognition tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-29T14:07:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.