Rational Sensibility: LLM Enhanced Empathetic Response Generation Guided
by Self-presentation Theory
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.08702v3
- Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 01:41:51 GMT
- Title: Rational Sensibility: LLM Enhanced Empathetic Response Generation Guided
by Self-presentation Theory
- Authors: Linzhuang Sun, Nan Xu, Jingxuan Wei, Bihui Yu, Liping Bu, Yin Luo
- Abstract summary: We have designed an innovative categorical approach that segregates historical dialogues into sensible and rational sentences.
We employ LLaMA2-70b as a rational brain to analyze the profound logical information maintained in conversations.
- Score: 8.594894523359887
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Having the ability to empathize is crucial for accurately representing human
behavior during conversations. Despite numerous research aim to improve the
cognitive capability of models by incorporating external knowledge, there has
been limited attention on the sensible and rational expression of the
conversation itself, which are crucial components of the cognitive empathy.
Guided by self-presentation theory in sociology, we have designed an innovative
categorical approach that segregates historical dialogues into sensible and
rational sentences and subsequently elucidate the context through the designed
attention mechanism. However, the rational information within the conversation
is restricted and the external knowledge used in previous methods have
limitations of semantic contradiction and narrow vision field. Considering the
impressive performance of LLM in the domain of intelligent agent. We employ
LLaMA2-70b as a rational brain to analyze the profound logical information
maintained in conversations, which assists the model assessing the balance of
sensibility and rationality to produce quality empathetic responses.
Experimental evaluations demonstrate that our method outperforms other
comparable methods on both automatic and human evaluations.
Related papers
- Comparing Rationality Between Large Language Models and Humans: Insights and Open Questions [6.201550639431176]
This paper focuses on the burgeoning prominence of large language models (LLMs)
We underscore the pivotal role of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) in augmenting LLMs' rationality and decision-making prowess.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-14T18:36:04Z) - Agent Assessment of Others Through the Lens of Self [1.223779595809275]
The paper argues that the quality of an autonomous agent's introspective capabilities of self are crucial in mirroring quality human-like understandings of other agents.
Ultimately, the vision set forth is not merely of machines that compute but of entities that introspect, empathize, and understand.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-18T17:15:04Z) - Enabling High-Level Machine Reasoning with Cognitive Neuro-Symbolic
Systems [67.01132165581667]
We propose to enable high-level reasoning in AI systems by integrating cognitive architectures with external neuro-symbolic components.
We illustrate a hybrid framework centered on ACT-R and we discuss the role of generative models in recent and future applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-13T21:20:17Z) - From Heuristic to Analytic: Cognitively Motivated Strategies for
Coherent Physical Commonsense Reasoning [66.98861219674039]
Heuristic-Analytic Reasoning (HAR) strategies drastically improve the coherence of rationalizations for model decisions.
Our findings suggest that human-like reasoning strategies can effectively improve the coherence and reliability of PLM reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-24T19:46:04Z) - Evaluating Subjective Cognitive Appraisals of Emotions from Large
Language Models [47.890846082224066]
This work fills the gap by presenting CovidET-Appraisals, the most comprehensive dataset to-date that assesses 24 appraisal dimensions.
CovidET-Appraisals presents an ideal testbed to evaluate the ability of large language models to automatically assess and explain cognitive appraisals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-22T19:12:17Z) - Affect Recognition in Conversations Using Large Language Models [9.426541302671545]
Affect recognition, encompassing emotions, moods, and feelings, plays a pivotal role in human communication.
This study delves into the capacity of large language models (LLMs) to recognise human affect in conversations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-22T14:11:23Z) - Interactive Natural Language Processing [67.87925315773924]
Interactive Natural Language Processing (iNLP) has emerged as a novel paradigm within the field of NLP.
This paper offers a comprehensive survey of iNLP, starting by proposing a unified definition and framework of the concept.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T17:18:29Z) - DialogueCRN: Contextual Reasoning Networks for Emotion Recognition in
Conversations [0.0]
We propose novel Contextual Reasoning Networks (DialogueCRN) to fully understand the conversational context from a cognitive perspective.
Inspired by the Cognitive Theory of Emotion, we design multi-turn reasoning modules to extract and integrate emotional clues.
The reasoning module iteratively performs an intuitive retrieving process and a conscious reasoning process, which imitates human unique cognitive thinking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-03T16:47:38Z) - You Impress Me: Dialogue Generation via Mutual Persona Perception [62.89449096369027]
The research in cognitive science suggests that understanding is an essential signal for a high-quality chit-chat conversation.
Motivated by this, we propose P2 Bot, a transmitter-receiver based framework with the aim of explicitly modeling understanding.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-11T12:51:07Z) - Neuro-symbolic Architectures for Context Understanding [59.899606495602406]
We propose the use of hybrid AI methodology as a framework for combining the strengths of data-driven and knowledge-driven approaches.
Specifically, we inherit the concept of neuro-symbolism as a way of using knowledge-bases to guide the learning progress of deep neural networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-09T15:04:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.