Clustering and Uncertainty Analysis to Improve the Machine
Learning-based Predictions of SAFARI-1 Control Follower Assembly Axial
Neutron Flux Profiles
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.14193v1
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 20:22:13 GMT
- Title: Clustering and Uncertainty Analysis to Improve the Machine
Learning-based Predictions of SAFARI-1 Control Follower Assembly Axial
Neutron Flux Profiles
- Authors: Lesego Moloko and Pavel Bokov and Xu Wu and Kostadin Ivanov
- Abstract summary: The goal of this work is to develop accurate Machine Learning (ML) models for predicting the assembly axial neutron flux profiles in the SAFARI-1 research reactor.
The data-driven nature of ML models makes them susceptible to uncertainties which are introduced by sources such as noise in training data.
The aim of this work is to improve the ML models for the control assemblies by a combination of supervised and unsupervised ML algorithms.
- Score: 2.517043342442487
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The goal of this work is to develop accurate Machine Learning (ML) models for
predicting the assembly axial neutron flux profiles in the SAFARI-1 research
reactor, trained by measurement data from historical cycles. The data-driven
nature of ML models makes them susceptible to uncertainties which are
introduced by sources such as noise in training data, incomplete coverage of
the domain, extrapolation and imperfect model architectures. To this end, we
also aim at quantifying the approximation uncertainties of the ML model
predictions. Previous work using Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) has been
successful for fuel assemblies in SAFARI-1, however, not as accurate for
control follower assemblies. The aim of this work is to improve the ML models
for the control assemblies by a combination of supervised and unsupervised ML
algorithms. The $k$-means and Affinity Propagation unsupervised ML algorithms
are employed to identify clusters in the set of the measured axial neutron flux
profiles. Then, regression-based supervised ML models using DNN (with
prediction uncertainties quantified with Monte Carlo dropout) and Gaussian
Process (GP) are trained for different clusters and the prediction uncertainty
is estimated. It was found that applying the proposed procedure improves the
prediction accuracy for the control assemblies and reduces the prediction
uncertainty. Flux shapes predicted by DNN and GP are very close, and the
overall accuracy became comparable to the fuel assemblies. The prediction
uncertainty is however smaller for GP models.
Related papers
- An Investigation on Machine Learning Predictive Accuracy Improvement and Uncertainty Reduction using VAE-based Data Augmentation [2.517043342442487]
Deep generative learning uses certain ML models to learn the underlying distribution of existing data and generate synthetic samples that resemble the real data.
In this study, our objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of data augmentation using variational autoencoder (VAE)-based deep generative models.
We investigated whether the data augmentation leads to improved accuracy in the predictions of a deep neural network (DNN) model trained using the augmented data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-24T18:15:48Z) - Scaling Laws for Predicting Downstream Performance in LLMs [75.28559015477137]
This work focuses on the pre-training loss as a more-efficient metric for performance estimation.
We extend the power law analytical function to predict domain-specific pre-training loss based on FLOPs across data sources.
We employ a two-layer neural network to model the non-linear relationship between multiple domain-specific loss and downstream performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-11T04:57:48Z) - Assumption-Lean and Data-Adaptive Post-Prediction Inference [1.5050365268347254]
We introduce PoSt-Prediction Adaptive inference (PSPA) that allows valid and powerful inference based on ML-predicted data.
We demonstrate the statistical superiority and broad applicability of our method through simulations and real-data applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-23T22:41:30Z) - Boosted Control Functions [10.503777692702952]
This work aims to bridge the gap between causal effect estimation and prediction tasks.
We establish a novel connection between the field of distribution from machine learning, and simultaneous equation models and control function from econometrics.
Within this framework, we propose a strong notion of invariance for a predictive model and compare it with existing (weaker) versions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-09T15:43:46Z) - Dynamic Model Agnostic Reliability Evaluation of Machine-Learning
Methods Integrated in Instrumentation & Control Systems [1.8978726202765634]
Trustworthiness of datadriven neural network-based machine learning algorithms is not adequately assessed.
In recent reports by the National Institute for Standards and Technology, trustworthiness in ML is a critical barrier to adoption.
We demonstrate a real-time model-agnostic method to evaluate the relative reliability of ML predictions by incorporating out-of-distribution detection on the training dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-08T18:25:42Z) - Episodic Gaussian Process-Based Learning Control with Vanishing Tracking
Errors [10.627020714408445]
We develop an episodic approach for learning GP models, such that an arbitrary tracking accuracy can be guaranteed.
The effectiveness of the derived theory is demonstrated in several simulations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-10T08:43:28Z) - Learning Sample Difficulty from Pre-trained Models for Reliable
Prediction [55.77136037458667]
We propose to utilize large-scale pre-trained models to guide downstream model training with sample difficulty-aware entropy regularization.
We simultaneously improve accuracy and uncertainty calibration across challenging benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-20T07:29:23Z) - Dense Uncertainty Estimation [62.23555922631451]
In this paper, we investigate neural networks and uncertainty estimation techniques to achieve both accurate deterministic prediction and reliable uncertainty estimation.
We work on two types of uncertainty estimations solutions, namely ensemble based methods and generative model based methods, and explain their pros and cons while using them in fully/semi/weakly-supervised framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-13T01:23:48Z) - Hessian-based toolbox for reliable and interpretable machine learning in
physics [58.720142291102135]
We present a toolbox for interpretability and reliability, extrapolation of the model architecture.
It provides a notion of the influence of the input data on the prediction at a given test point, an estimation of the uncertainty of the model predictions, and an agnostic score for the model predictions.
Our work opens the road to the systematic use of interpretability and reliability methods in ML applied to physics and, more generally, science.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-04T16:32:59Z) - Imputation-Free Learning from Incomplete Observations [73.15386629370111]
We introduce the importance of guided gradient descent (IGSGD) method to train inference from inputs containing missing values without imputation.
We employ reinforcement learning (RL) to adjust the gradients used to train the models via back-propagation.
Our imputation-free predictions outperform the traditional two-step imputation-based predictions using state-of-the-art imputation methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-05T12:44:39Z) - Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under
Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation.
We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.