Assessing the Impact of Prompting Methods on ChatGPT's Mathematical Capabilities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.15006v2
• Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 18:44:20 GMT
• Title: Assessing the Impact of Prompting Methods on ChatGPT's Mathematical Capabilities
• Authors: Yuhao Chen, Chloe Wong, Hanwen Yang, Juan Aguenza, Sai Bhujangari, Benthan Vu, Xun Lei, Amisha Prasad, Manny Fluss, Eric Phuong, Minghao Liu, Raja Kumar, Vanshika Vats, James Davis
• Abstract summary: This study critically evaluates the efficacy of prompting methods in enhancing the mathematical reasoning capability of large language models (LLMs) We conduct this analysis on OpenAI's LLM, ChatGPT-3.5, on extensive problem sets from the MATH, GSM8K, and MMLU datasets. Contrary to expectations, our empirical analysis reveals that none of the investigated methods consistently improves over ChatGPT-3.5's baseline performance.
• Score: 5.362057681411727
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This study critically evaluates the efficacy of prompting methods in enhancing the mathematical reasoning capability of large language models (LLMs). The investigation uses three prescriptive prompting methods - simple, persona, and conversational prompting - known for their effectiveness in enhancing the linguistic tasks of LLMs. We conduct this analysis on OpenAI's LLM chatbot, ChatGPT-3.5, on extensive problem sets from the MATH, GSM8K, and MMLU datasets, encompassing a broad spectrum of mathematical challenges. A grading script adapted to each dataset is used to determine the effectiveness of these prompting interventions in enhancing the model's mathematical analysis power. Contrary to expectations, our empirical analysis reveals that none of the investigated methods consistently improves over ChatGPT-3.5's baseline performance, with some causing significant degradation. Our findings suggest that prompting strategies do not necessarily generalize to new domains, in this study failing to enhance mathematical performance.

Related papers

• A Looming Replication Crisis in Evaluating Behavior in Language Models? Evidence and Solutions [15.350973327319418]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into a wide range of everyday applications. This raises concerns about the replicability and generalizability of insights gained from research on LLM behavior. We tested GPT-3.5, GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5 Pro, Claude 3 Opus, Llama 3-8B, and Llama 3-70B, on the chain-of-thought, EmotionPrompting, ExpertPrompting, Sandbagging, as well as Re-Reading prompt engineering techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T14:00:34Z)
• SIaM: Self-Improving Code-Assisted Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models [54.78329741186446]
  We propose a novel paradigm that uses a code-based critic model to guide steps including question-code data construction, quality control, and complementary evaluation. Experiments across both in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks in English and Chinese demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T06:33:03Z)
• Exposing the Achilles' Heel: Evaluating LLMs Ability to Handle Mistakes in Mathematical Reasoning [11.63133816413199]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have been applied to Math Word Problems (MWPs) We introduce a novel dataset MWP-MISTAKE, incorporating MWPs with both correct and incorrect reasoning steps generated through rule-based methods and smaller language models. We highlight GPT-$o's superior performance in mistake detection and rectification and the persistent challenges faced by smaller models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T08:06:05Z)
• MindStar: Enhancing Math Reasoning in Pre-trained LLMs at Inference Time [51.5039731721706]
  MindStar is a purely inference-based searching method for large language models. It formulates reasoning tasks as searching problems and proposes two search ideas to identify the optimal reasoning paths. It significantly enhances the reasoning abilities of open-source models, such as Llama-2-13B and Mistral-7B, and achieves comparable performance to GPT-3.5 and Grok-1.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-25T15:07:33Z)
• Look Before You Leap: Problem Elaboration Prompting Improves Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models [15.65204261844768]
  We propose a new approach named Problem Elaboration Prompting (PEP) to enhance the mathematical capacities of large language models (LLMs) PEP decomposes and elucidates the problem context before reasoning, therefore enhancing the context modeling and parsing efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-24T08:40:30Z)
• The Efficiency Spectrum of Large Language Models: An Algorithmic Survey [54.19942426544731]
  The rapid growth of Large Language Models (LLMs) has been a driving force in transforming various domains. This paper examines the multi-faceted dimensions of efficiency essential for the end-to-end algorithmic development of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-01T16:00:25Z)
• Investigating the Efficacy of Large Language Models in Reflective Assessment Methods through Chain of Thoughts Prompting [0.2552922646705803]
  Chain of Thought(CoT) prompting method has been proposed as a means to enhance LLMs' proficiency in complex reasoning tasks. The primary aim of this research is to assess how well four language models can grade reflective essays of third-year medical students.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-30T06:25:27Z)
• Evaluating and Improving Tool-Augmented Computation-Intensive Math Reasoning [75.74103236299477]
  Chain-of-thought prompting(CoT) and tool augmentation have been validated as effective practices for improving large language models. We propose a new approach that can deliberate the reasoning steps with tool interfaces, namely textbfDELI. Experimental results on CARP and six other datasets show that the proposed DELI mostly outperforms competitive baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-04T17:02:59Z)
• Evaluating Language Models for Mathematics through Interactions [116.67206980096513]
  We introduce CheckMate, a prototype platform for humans to interact with and evaluate large language models (LLMs) We conduct a study with CheckMate to evaluate three language models (InstructGPT, ChatGPT, and GPT-4) as assistants in proving undergraduate-level mathematics. We derive a taxonomy of human behaviours and uncover that despite a generally positive correlation, there are notable instances of divergence between correctness and perceived helpfulness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-02T17:12:25Z)
• Let GPT be a Math Tutor: Teaching Math Word Problem Solvers with Customized Exercise Generation [39.282695549919495]
  We present a novel approach for distilling math word problem solving capabilities from large language models (LLMs) into smaller, more efficient student models. Our approach is designed to consider the student model's weaknesses and foster a tailored learning experience by generating targeted exercises aligned with educational science principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T17:36:14Z)
• Multi-objective hyperparameter optimization with performance uncertainty [62.997667081978825]
  This paper presents results on multi-objective hyperparameter optimization with uncertainty on the evaluation of Machine Learning algorithms. We combine the sampling strategy of Tree-structured Parzen Estimators (TPE) with the metamodel obtained after training a Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) with heterogeneous noise. Experimental results on three analytical test functions and three ML problems show the improvement over multi-objective TPE and GPR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-09T14:58:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.