Related papers: Turing's Test, a Beautiful Thought Experiment

Turing's Test, a Beautiful Thought Experiment

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00009v3
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 17:29:32 GMT
Title: Turing's Test, a Beautiful Thought Experiment
Authors: Bernardo Gonçalves,
Abstract summary: There has been a resurgence of claims and questions about the Turing test and its value. If AI were quantum physics, by now several "Schr"odinger's" cats would have been killed. This paper presents a wealth of evidence, including new archival sources, and gives original answers to several open questions about Turing's 1950 paper.
Score: 0.0
License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Abstract: In the wake of the latest trends of artificial intelligence (AI), there has been a resurgence of claims and questions about the Turing test and its value, which are reminiscent of decades of practical "Turing" tests. If AI were quantum physics, by now several "Schr\"odinger's" cats would have been killed. It is time for a historical reconstruction of Turing's beautiful thought experiment. This paper presents a wealth of evidence, including new archival sources, and gives original answers to several open questions about Turing's 1950 paper, including its relation with early AI.

Related papers

Passed the Turing Test: Living in Turing Futures [0.0]
We are now living in one of many possible Turing futures where machines can pass for what they are not. However, the learning machines that Turing imagined would pass his imitation tests were machines inspired by the natural development of the low-energy human cortex.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-11T22:56:30Z)
On the consistent reasoning paradox of intelligence and optimal trust in AI: The power of 'I don't know' [79.69412622010249]
Consistent reasoning, which lies at the core of human intelligence, is the ability to handle tasks that are equivalent. CRP asserts that consistent reasoning implies fallibility -- in particular, human-like intelligence in AI necessarily comes with human-like fallibility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-05T10:06:53Z)
Machine learning and information theory concepts towards an AI Mathematician [77.63761356203105]
The current state-of-the-art in artificial intelligence is impressive, especially in terms of mastery of language, but not so much in terms of mathematical reasoning. This essay builds on the idea that current deep learning mostly succeeds at system 1 abilities. It takes an information-theoretical posture to ask questions about what constitutes an interesting mathematical statement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-07T15:12:06Z)
AI for Mathematics: A Cognitive Science Perspective [86.02346372284292]
Mathematics is one of the most powerful conceptual systems developed and used by the human species. Rapid progress in AI, particularly propelled by advances in large language models (LLMs), has sparked renewed, widespread interest in building such systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-19T02:00:31Z)
Reliable AI: Does the Next Generation Require Quantum Computing? [71.84486326350338]
We show that digital hardware is inherently constrained in solving problems about optimization, deep learning, or differential equations. In contrast, analog computing models, such as the Blum-Shub-Smale machine, exhibit the potential to surmount these limitations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-03T19:10:45Z)
The Human-or-Machine Matter: Turing-Inspired Reflections on an Everyday Issue [4.309879785418976]
We sidestep the question of whether a machine can be labeled intelligent, or can be said to match human capabilities in a given context. We first draw attention to the seemingly simpler question a person may ask themselves in an everyday interaction: Am I interacting with a human or with a machine?''
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-07T15:41:11Z)
The Turing Deception [0.0]
This research revisits the classic Turing test and compares recent large language models such as ChatGPT. The question of whether an algorithm displays hints of Turing's truly original thoughts remains unanswered and potentially unanswerable for now.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-09T16:32:11Z)
The Meta-Turing Test [17.68987003293372]
We propose an alternative to the Turing test that removes the inherent asymmetry between humans and machines. In this new test, both humans and machines judge each other.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-11T04:54:14Z)
Why AI is Harder Than We Think [0.0]
The field of artificial intelligence has cycled several times between periods of optimistic predictions and massive investment. I describe four fallacies in common assumptions made by AI researchers, which can lead to overconfident predictions about the field. I conclude by discussing the open questions spurred by these fallacies, including the age-old challenge of imbuing machines with humanlike common sense.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-26T20:39:18Z)
Inductive Biases for Deep Learning of Higher-Level Cognition [108.89281493851358]
A fascinating hypothesis is that human and animal intelligence could be explained by a few principles. This work considers a larger list, focusing on those which concern mostly higher-level and sequential conscious processing. The objective of clarifying these particular principles is that they could potentially help us build AI systems benefiting from humans' abilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-30T18:29:25Z)
Reservoir memory machines [79.79659145328856]
We propose reservoir memory machines, which are able to solve some of the benchmark tests for Neural Turing Machines. Our model can also be seen as an extension of echo state networks with an external memory, enabling arbitrarily long storage without interference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-12T01:45:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.