Automation of Smart Homes with Multiple Rule Sources
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.02451v1
- Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 14:40:05 GMT
- Title: Automation of Smart Homes with Multiple Rule Sources
- Abstract summary: Managing rules from various sources requires a structured procedure, a relevant policy, and a designated authority.
Our proposed approach and system implementation introduce a rule management process, a rule administrator, and a domain-specific rule language.
The system provides a learning process that observes residents, detects behavior patterns, and derives rules which are then presented as recommendations to the system.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Using rules for home automation presents several challenges, especially when
considering multiple stakeholders in addition to residents, such as homeowners,
local authorities, energy suppliers, and system providers, who will wish to
contribute rules to safeguard their interests. Managing rules from various
sources requires a structured procedure, a relevant policy, and a designated
authority to ensure authorized and correct contributions and address potential
conflicts. In addition, the smart home rule language needs to express
conditions and decisions at a high level of abstraction without specifying
implementation details such as interfaces, access protocols, and room layout.
Decoupling high-level decisions from these details supports the transferability
and adaptability of rules to similar homes. This separation also has important
implications for structuring the smart home system and the security
architecture. Our proposed approach and system implementation introduce a rule
management process, a rule administrator, and a domain-specific rule language
to address these challenges. In addition, the system provides a learning
process that observes residents, detects behavior patterns, and derives rules
which are then presented as recommendations to the system.
Related papers
- Rule-Compliant Visual Spatial Planning for Multimodal Large Language Models [9.477726328920694]
RuleMaze is a controllable benchmark in which MLLMs must navigate mazes while obeying natural-language rules of varying complexity.<n>Disentangled Multimodal Planning (DMP) separates perception, execution, and rule verification through interpretable reasoning primitives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-20T16:28:28Z) - Deontic Policies for Runtime Governance of Agentic AI Systems [2.1095754823099657]
We propose AgenticRei, which realizes key governance requirements such as obligations, dispensations, policy conflict resolutions, and reasoning over policies.<n>Our approach composes naturally with industry-standard frameworks like A2AS.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-17T18:02:07Z) - Security, privacy, and agentic AI in a regulatory view: From definitions and distinctions to provisions and reflections [53.468443050795344]
The rapid proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has led to a dynamic regulatory landscape.<n>As AI paradigms shift towards greater autonomy, specifically in the form of agentic AI, it becomes increasingly challenging to articulate regulatory stipulations.<n>This paper reviews the evolving European Union (EU) AI regulatory provisions via analyzing 24 relevant documents published between 2024 and 2025.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-19T13:50:52Z) - HIPO: Instruction Hierarchy via Constrained Reinforcement Learning [57.40686733111483]
textscHIPO is a novel alignment framework that formulates HIF as a Constrained Markov Decision Process.<n>textscHIPO elevates system prompts from mere input context to strict algorithmic boundaries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-17T06:12:41Z) - Sovereign-by-Design A Reference Architecture for AI and Blockchain Enabled Systems [2.9407799864652837]
We argue that sovereignty must be treated as a first-class architectural property rather than a purely regulatory objective.<n>We introduce a Sovereign Reference Architecture that integrates self-sovereign identity, blockchain-based trust and auditability, sovereign data governance, and Generative AI deployed under explicit architectural control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-05T09:49:04Z) - Statutory Construction and Interpretation for Artificial Intelligence [19.65776192762091]
We show how different interpretations of the same rule can lead to inconsistent or unstable model behavior.<n>We propose a computational framework that mirrors two legal mechanisms.<n>Our approach offers a first step toward systematically managing interpretive ambiguity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-01T07:10:22Z) - Data Sharing, Privacy and Security Considerations in the Energy Sector: A Review from Technical Landscape to Regulatory Specifications [49.567747749614924]
Decarbonization, decentralization and digitalization are the three key elements driving the twin energy transition.
This paper conducts a comprehensive review of the data-related issues for the energy system by integrating both technical and regulatory dimensions.
We classify the issues into three categories: (i) data-sharing among energy end users and stakeholders (ii) privacy of end users, and (iii) cyber security.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-05T14:23:56Z) - RegNLP in Action: Facilitating Compliance Through Automated Information Retrieval and Answer Generation [51.998738311700095]
Regulatory documents, characterized by their length, complexity and frequent updates, are challenging to interpret.
RegNLP is a multidisciplinary subfield aimed at simplifying access to and interpretation of regulatory rules and obligations.
ObliQA dataset contains 27,869 questions derived from the Abu Dhabi Global Markets (ADGM) financial regulation document collection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-09T14:44:19Z) - The Artificial Intelligence Act: critical overview [0.0]
This article provides a critical overview of the recently approved Artificial Intelligence Act.
It starts by presenting the main structure, objectives, and approach of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689.
The text concludes that even if the overall framework can be deemed adequate and balanced, the approach is so complex that it risks defeating its own purpose.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-30T21:38:02Z) - From Principles to Rules: A Regulatory Approach for Frontier AI [2.1764247401772705]
Regulators may require frontier AI developers to adopt safety measures.
The requirements could be formulated as high-level principles or specific rules.
These regulatory approaches, known as 'principle-based' and 'rule-based' regulation, have complementary strengths and weaknesses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-10T01:45:15Z) - Reinforcement Learning with Options and State Representation [105.82346211739433]
This thesis aims to explore the reinforcement learning field and build on existing methods to produce improved ones.
It addresses such goals by decomposing learning tasks in a hierarchical fashion known as Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-16T08:30:55Z) - SoFA: Shielded On-the-fly Alignment via Priority Rule Following [90.32819418613407]
This paper introduces a novel alignment paradigm, priority rule following, which defines rules as the primary control mechanism in each dialog.
We present PriorityDistill, a semi-automated approach for distilling priority following signals from simulations to ensure robust rule integration and adherence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-27T09:52:27Z) - ChatRule: Mining Logical Rules with Large Language Models for Knowledge
Graph Reasoning [107.61997887260056]
We propose a novel framework, ChatRule, unleashing the power of large language models for mining logical rules over knowledge graphs.
Specifically, the framework is initiated with an LLM-based rule generator, leveraging both the semantic and structural information of KGs.
To refine the generated rules, a rule ranking module estimates the rule quality by incorporating facts from existing KGs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-04T11:38:02Z) - FedRule: Federated Rule Recommendation System with Graph Neural Networks [26.514896057601206]
Rule recommendation systems can automatically suggest rules for users by learning which rules are popular.
Conventional recommendation formulations require a central server to record the rules used in many users' homes.
In this paper, we propose a new rule recommendation system, dubbed as FedRule, to address these challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-13T04:36:36Z) - Risk-Aware Fine-Grained Access Control in Cyber-Physical Contexts [12.138525287184061]
RASA is a context-sensitive access authorization approach and mechanism leveraging unsupervised machine learning to automatically infer risk-based authorization decision boundaries.
We explore RASA in a healthcare usage environment, wherein cyber and physical conditions create context-specific risks for protecting private health information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-29T03:38:45Z) - Decision Rule Elicitation for Domain Adaptation [93.02675868486932]
Human-in-the-loop machine learning is widely used in artificial intelligence (AI) to elicit labels from experts.
In this work, we allow experts to additionally produce decision rules describing their decision-making.
We show that decision rule elicitation improves domain adaptation of the algorithm and helps to propagate expert's knowledge to the AI model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-23T08:07:22Z) - Rewriting a Deep Generative Model [56.91974064348137]
We introduce a new problem setting: manipulation of specific rules encoded by a deep generative model.
We propose a formulation in which the desired rule is changed by manipulating a layer of a deep network as a linear associative memory.
We present a user interface to enable users to interactively change the rules of a generative model to achieve desired effects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-30T17:58:16Z) - Building Rule Hierarchies for Efficient Logical Rule Learning from
Knowledge Graphs [20.251630903853016]
We propose new methods for pruning unpromising rules using rule hierarchies.
We show that the application of HPMs is effective in removing unpromising rules.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-29T16:33:30Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.