The Artificial Intelligence Act: critical overview
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.00264v1
- Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 21:38:02 GMT
- Title: The Artificial Intelligence Act: critical overview
- Authors: Nuno Sousa e Silva,
- Abstract summary: This article provides a critical overview of the recently approved Artificial Intelligence Act.
It starts by presenting the main structure, objectives, and approach of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689.
The text concludes that even if the overall framework can be deemed adequate and balanced, the approach is so complex that it risks defeating its own purpose.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: This article provides a critical overview of the recently approved Artificial Intelligence Act. It starts by presenting the main structure, objectives, and approach of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. A definition of key concepts follows, and then the material and territorial scope, as well as the timing of application, are analyzed. Although the Regulation does not explicitly set out principles, the main ideas of fairness, accountability, transparency, and equity in AI underly a set of rules of the regulation. This is discussed before looking at the ill-defined set of forbidden AI practices (manipulation and e exploitation of vulnerabilities, social scoring, biometric identification and classification, and predictive policing). It is highlighted that those rules deal with behaviors rather than AI systems. The qualification and regulation of high-risk AI systems are tackled, alongside the obligation of transparency for certain systems, the regulation of general-purpose models, and the rules on certification, supervision, and sanctions. The text concludes that even if the overall framework can be deemed adequate and balanced, the approach is so complex that it risks defeating its own purpose of promoting responsible innovation within the European Union and beyond its borders.
Related papers
- Using AI Alignment Theory to understand the potential pitfalls of regulatory frameworks [55.2480439325792]
This paper critically examines the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act)
Uses insights from Alignment Theory (AT) research, which focuses on the potential pitfalls of technical alignment in Artificial Intelligence.
As we apply these concepts to the EU AI Act, we uncover potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement in the regulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-10T17:38:38Z) - Human Oversight of Artificial Intelligence and Technical Standardisation [0.0]
Within the global governance of AI, the requirement for human oversight is embodied in several regulatory formats.
The EU legislator is therefore going much further than in the past in "spelling out" the legal requirement for human oversight.
The question of the place of humans in the AI decision-making process should be given particular attention.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-02T07:43:46Z) - False Sense of Security in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) [3.298597939573779]
We argue that AI regulations and current market conditions threaten effective AI governance and safety.
Unless governments explicitly tackle the issue of explainability through clear legislative and policy statements, AI governance risks becoming a vacuous "box-ticking" exercise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-06T20:02:07Z) - Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair
Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
"Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture.
This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias.
In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z) - The risks of risk-based AI regulation: taking liability seriously [46.90451304069951]
The development and regulation of AI seems to have reached a critical stage.
Some experts are calling for a moratorium on the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4.
This paper analyses the most advanced legal proposal, the European Union's AI Act.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-03T12:51:37Z) - Explainability in AI Policies: A Critical Review of Communications,
Reports, Regulations, and Standards in the EU, US, and UK [1.5039745292757671]
We perform the first thematic and gap analysis of policies and standards on explainability in the EU, US, and UK.
We find that policies are often informed by coarse notions and requirements for explanations.
We propose recommendations on how to address explainability in regulations for AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-20T07:53:07Z) - Quantitative study about the estimated impact of the AI Act [0.0]
We suggest a systematic approach that we applied on the initial draft of the AI Act that has been released in April 2021.
We went through several iterations of compiling the list of AI products and projects in and from Germany, which the Lernende Systeme platform lists.
It turns out that only about 30% of the AI systems considered would be regulated by the AI Act, the rest would be classified as low-risk.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-29T06:23:16Z) - Tackling problems, harvesting benefits -- A systematic review of the
regulatory debate around AI [0.0]
How to integrate an emerging and all-pervasive technology such as AI into the structures and operations of our society is a question of contemporary politics, science and public debate.
This article analyzes the academic debate around the regulation of artificial intelligence (AI)
The analysis concentrates on societal risks and harms, questions of regulatory responsibility, and possible adequate policy frameworks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-07T11:29:30Z) - Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary
Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them.
We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives.
We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z) - An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive
qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence.
The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z) - Hacia los Comit\'es de \'Etica en Inteligencia Artificial [68.8204255655161]
It is priority to create the rules and specialized organizations that can oversight the following of such rules.
This work proposes the creation, at the universities, of Ethical Committees or Commissions specialized on Artificial Intelligence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-11T23:48:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.