Large Language Models in Mental Health Care: a Scoping Review

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.02984v2
• Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 13:55:37 GMT
• Title: Large Language Models in Mental Health Care: a Scoping Review
• Authors: Yining Hua, Fenglin Liu, Kailai Yang, Zehan Li, Hongbin Na, Yi-han Sheu, Peilin Zhou, Lauren V. Moran, Sophia Ananiadou, Andrew Beam, John Torous,
• Abstract summary: The integration of large language models (LLMs) in mental health care is an emerging field. There is a need to systematically review the application outcomes and delineate the advantages and limitations in clinical settings. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the use of LLMs in mental health care, assessing their efficacy, challenges, and potential for future applications.
• Score: 28.635427491110484
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The integration of large language models (LLMs) in mental health care is an emerging field. There is a need to systematically review the application outcomes and delineate the advantages and limitations in clinical settings. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the use of LLMs in mental health care, assessing their efficacy, challenges, and potential for future applications. A systematic search was conducted across multiple databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, arXiv, medRxiv, and PsyArXiv in November 2023. All forms of original research, peer-reviewed or not, published or disseminated between October 1, 2019, and December 2, 2023, are included without language restrictions if they used LLMs developed after T5 and directly addressed research questions in mental health care settings. From an initial pool of 313 articles, 34 met the inclusion criteria based on their relevance to LLM application in mental health care and the robustness of reported outcomes. Diverse applications of LLMs in mental health care are identified, including diagnosis, therapy, patient engagement enhancement, etc. Key challenges include data availability and reliability, nuanced handling of mental states, and effective evaluation methods. Despite successes in accuracy and accessibility improvement, gaps in clinical applicability and ethical considerations were evident, pointing to the need for robust data, standardized evaluations, and interdisciplinary collaboration. LLMs hold substantial promise for enhancing mental health care. For their full potential to be realized, emphasis must be placed on developing robust datasets, development and evaluation frameworks, ethical guidelines, and interdisciplinary collaborations to address current limitations.

Related papers

• Med-CoDE: Medical Critique based Disagreement Evaluation Framework [72.42301910238861]
  The reliability and accuracy of large language models (LLMs) in medical contexts remain critical concerns. Current evaluation methods often lack robustness and fail to provide a comprehensive assessment of LLM performance. We propose Med-CoDE, a specifically designed evaluation framework for medical LLMs to address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T16:51:11Z)
• Quantifying the Reasoning Abilities of LLMs on Real-world Clinical Cases [48.87360916431396]
  We introduce MedR-Bench, a benchmarking dataset of 1,453 structured patient cases, annotated with reasoning references. We propose a framework encompassing three critical examination recommendation, diagnostic decision-making, and treatment planning, simulating the entire patient care journey. Using this benchmark, we evaluate five state-of-the-art reasoning LLMs, including DeepSeek-R1, OpenAI-o3-mini, and Gemini-2.0-Flash Thinking, etc.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T18:35:39Z)
• Structured Outputs Enable General-Purpose LLMs to be Medical Experts [50.02627258858336]
  Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with open-ended medical questions. We propose a novel approach utilizing structured medical reasoning. Our approach achieves the highest Factuality Score of 85.8, surpassing fine-tuned models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T05:24:55Z)
• PsychBench: A comprehensive and professional benchmark for evaluating the performance of LLM-assisted psychiatric clinical practice [20.166682569070073]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) offer potential solutions to address problems such as shortage of medical resources and low diagnostic consistency in psychiatric clinical practice. We propose a benchmarking system, PsychBench, to evaluate the practical performance of LLMs in psychiatric clinical settings. We show that while existing models demonstrate significant potential, they are not yet adequate as decision-making tools in psychiatric clinical practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-28T12:17:41Z)
• A Survey of Large Language Models in Psychotherapy: Current Landscape and Future Directions [13.17064228097947]
  Large language models (LLMs) offer promising solutions in psychotherapy by enhancing the assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of mental health conditions. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of the current landscape of LLM applications in psychotherapy. We present a novel conceptual taxonomy to organize the psychotherapy process into three core components: assessment, diagnosis, and treatment, and examine the challenges and advancements in each area.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T12:18:40Z)
• Towards Privacy-aware Mental Health AI Models: Advances, Challenges, and Opportunities [61.633126163190724]
  Mental illness is a widespread and debilitating condition with substantial societal and personal costs. Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) hold great potential for recognizing and addressing conditions such as depression, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Privacy concerns, including the risk of sensitive data leakage from datasets and trained models, remain a critical barrier to deploying these AI systems in real-world clinical settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-01T15:10:02Z)
• LlaMADRS: Prompting Large Language Models for Interview-Based Depression Assessment [75.44934940580112]
  This study introduces LlaMADRS, a novel framework leveraging open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate depression severity assessment. We employ a zero-shot prompting strategy with carefully designed cues to guide the model in interpreting and scoring transcribed clinical interviews. Our approach, tested on 236 real-world interviews, demonstrates strong correlations with clinician assessments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-07T08:49:04Z)
• SouLLMate: An Application Enhancing Diverse Mental Health Support with Adaptive LLMs, Prompt Engineering, and RAG Techniques [9.146311285410631]
  Mental health issues significantly impact individuals' daily lives, yet many do not receive the help they need even with available online resources. This study aims to provide diverse, accessible, stigma-free, personalized, and real-time mental health support through cutting-edge AI technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T22:04:32Z)
• Reasoning-Enhanced Healthcare Predictions with Knowledge Graph Community Retrieval [61.70489848327436]
  KARE is a novel framework that integrates knowledge graph (KG) community-level retrieval with large language models (LLMs) reasoning. Extensive experiments demonstrate that KARE outperforms leading models by up to 10.8-15.0% on MIMIC-III and 12.6-12.7% on MIMIC-IV for mortality and readmission predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T18:46:28Z)
• SouLLMate: An Adaptive LLM-Driven System for Advanced Mental Health Support and Assessment, Based on a Systematic Application Survey [9.146311285410631]
  Mental health issues significantly impact individuals' daily lives, yet many do not receive the help they need even with available online resources. This study aims to provide accessible, stigma-free, personalized, and real-time mental health support through cutting-edge AI technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T17:11:29Z)
• Towards Evaluating and Building Versatile Large Language Models for Medicine [57.49547766838095]
  We present MedS-Bench, a benchmark designed to evaluate the performance of large language models (LLMs) in clinical contexts. MedS-Bench spans 11 high-level clinical tasks, including clinical report summarization, treatment recommendations, diagnosis, named entity recognition, and medical concept explanation. MedS-Ins comprises 58 medically oriented language corpora, totaling 13.5 million samples across 122 tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T17:01:34Z)
• Applying and Evaluating Large Language Models in Mental Health Care: A Scoping Review of Human-Assessed Generative Tasks [16.099253839889148]
  Large language models (LLMs) are emerging as promising tools for mental health care, offering scalable support through their ability to generate human-like responses. However, the effectiveness of these models in clinical settings remains unclear. This scoping review focused on studies where these models were tested with human participants in real-world scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T02:21:59Z)
• GMAI-MMBench: A Comprehensive Multimodal Evaluation Benchmark Towards General Medical AI [67.09501109871351]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) are capable of handling diverse data types such as imaging, text, and physiological signals. GMAI-MMBench is the most comprehensive general medical AI benchmark with well-categorized data structure and multi-perceptual granularity to date. It is constructed from 284 datasets across 38 medical image modalities, 18 clinical-related tasks, 18 departments, and 4 perceptual granularities in a Visual Question Answering (VQA) format.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T17:59:21Z)
• TrialBench: Multi-Modal Artificial Intelligence-Ready Clinical Trial Datasets [57.067409211231244]
  This paper presents meticulously curated AIready datasets covering multi-modal data (e.g., drug molecule, disease code, text, categorical/numerical features) and 8 crucial prediction challenges in clinical trial design. We provide basic validation methods for each task to ensure the datasets' usability and reliability. We anticipate that the availability of such open-access datasets will catalyze the development of advanced AI approaches for clinical trial design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-30T09:13:10Z)
• Large Language Model for Mental Health: A Systematic Review [2.9429776664692526]
  Large language models (LLMs) have attracted significant attention for potential applications in digital health. This systematic review focuses on their strengths and limitations in early screening, digital interventions, and clinical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T17:58:41Z)
• Benefits and Harms of Large Language Models in Digital Mental Health [40.02859683420844]
  Large language models (LLMs) show promise in leading digital mental health to uncharted territory. This article presents contemporary perspectives on the opportunities and risks posed by LLMs in the design, development, and implementation of digital mental health tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-07T14:11:10Z)
• Large Language Models for Healthcare Data Augmentation: An Example on Patient-Trial Matching [49.78442796596806]
  We propose an innovative privacy-aware data augmentation approach for patient-trial matching (LLM-PTM) Our experiments demonstrate a 7.32% average improvement in performance using the proposed LLM-PTM method, and the generalizability to new data is improved by 12.12%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-24T03:14:00Z)
• Benchmarking Automated Clinical Language Simplification: Dataset, Algorithm, and Evaluation [48.87254340298189]
  We construct a new dataset named MedLane to support the development and evaluation of automated clinical language simplification approaches. We propose a new model called DECLARE that follows the human annotation procedure and achieves state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-04T06:09:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.