An ontology alignment method with user intervention using compact differential evolution with adaptive parameter control

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.06337v2
• Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 13:29:42 GMT
• Title: An ontology alignment method with user intervention using compact differential evolution with adaptive parameter control
• Authors: Zhaoming Lv
• Abstract summary: The proposed approach can improve the alignment quality compared to the non-interactive approach. Compared with the state-of-the-art methods from OAEI, the results show that the proposed algorithm has a better performance under the same error rate.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: User interaction is one of the most effective ways to improve the ontology alignment quality. However, this approach faces the challenge of how users can participate effectively in the matching process. To solve this challenge. In this paper, an interactive ontology alignment approach using compact differential evolution algorithm with adaptive parameter control (IOACDE) is proposed. In this method, the ontology alignment process is modeled as an interactive optimization problem and users are allowed to intervene in matching in two ways. One is that the mapping suggestions generated by IOACDE as a complete candidate alignment is evaluated by user during optimization process. The other is that the user ameliorates the alignment results by evaluating single mapping after the automatic matching process. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm, the neural embedding model and K nearest neighbor (KNN) is employed to simulate user for the ontologies of the real world. The experimental results show that the proposed interactive approach can improve the alignment quality compared to the non-interactive. Compared with the state-of-the-art methods from OAEI, the results show that the proposed algorithm has a better performance under the same error rate.

Related papers

• Faster WIND: Accelerating Iterative Best-of-$N$ Distillation for LLM Alignment [81.84950252537618]
  This paper reveals a unified game-theoretic connection between iterative BOND and self-play alignment. We establish a novel framework, WIN rate Dominance (WIND), with a series of efficient algorithms for regularized win rate dominance optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T04:47:39Z)
• Model Uncertainty in Evolutionary Optimization and Bayesian Optimization: A Comparative Analysis [5.6787965501364335]
  Black-box optimization problems are common in many real-world applications. These problems require optimization through input-output interactions without access to internal workings. Two widely used gradient-free optimization techniques are employed to address such challenges. This paper aims to elucidate the similarities and differences in the utilization of model uncertainty between these two methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T13:59:19Z)
• Reinforcement Learning Methods for Wordle: A POMDP/Adaptive Control Approach [0.3093890460224435]
  We address the solution of the popular Wordle puzzle, using new reinforcement learning methods. For the Wordle puzzle, they yield on-line solution strategies that are very close to optimal at relatively modest computational cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-15T03:46:41Z)
• ECO-TR: Efficient Correspondences Finding Via Coarse-to-Fine Refinement [80.94378602238432]
  We propose an efficient structure named Correspondence Efficient Transformer (ECO-TR) by finding correspondences in a coarse-to-fine manner. To achieve this, multiple transformer blocks are stage-wisely connected to gradually refine the predicted coordinates. Experiments on various sparse and dense matching tasks demonstrate the superiority of our method in both efficiency and effectiveness against existing state-of-the-arts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-25T13:05:33Z)
• An Actor-Critic Method for Simulation-Based Optimization [6.261751912603047]
  We focus on a simulation-based optimization problem of choosing the best design from the feasible space. We formulate the sampling process as a policy searching problem and give a solution from the perspective of Reinforcement Learning (RL) Some experiments are designed to validate the effectiveness of proposed algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-31T09:04:23Z)
• Adaptive Sampling for Heterogeneous Rank Aggregation from Noisy Pairwise Comparisons [85.5955376526419]
  In rank aggregation problems, users exhibit various accuracy levels when comparing pairs of items. We propose an elimination-based active sampling strategy, which estimates the ranking of items via noisy pairwise comparisons. We prove that our algorithm can return the true ranking of items with high probability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-08T13:51:55Z)
• Scalable Personalised Item Ranking through Parametric Density Estimation [53.44830012414444]
  Learning from implicit feedback is challenging because of the difficult nature of the one-class problem. Most conventional methods use a pairwise ranking approach and negative samplers to cope with the one-class problem. We propose a learning-to-rank approach, which achieves convergence speed comparable to the pointwise counterpart.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-11T03:38:16Z)
• Meta-Regularization: An Approach to Adaptive Choice of the Learning Rate in Gradient Descent [20.47598828422897]
  We propose textit-Meta-Regularization, a novel approach for the adaptive choice of the learning rate in first-order descent methods. Our approach modifies the objective function by adding a regularization term, and casts the joint process parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-12T13:13:34Z)
• DEALIO: Data-Efficient Adversarial Learning for Imitation from Observation [57.358212277226315]
  In imitation learning from observation IfO, a learning agent seeks to imitate a demonstrating agent using only observations of the demonstrated behavior without access to the control signals generated by the demonstrator. Recent methods based on adversarial imitation learning have led to state-of-the-art performance on IfO problems, but they typically suffer from high sample complexity due to a reliance on data-inefficient, model-free reinforcement learning algorithms. This issue makes them impractical to deploy in real-world settings, where gathering samples can incur high costs in terms of time, energy, and risk. We propose a more data-efficient IfO algorithm
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-31T23:46:32Z)
• On the implementation of a global optimization method for mixed-variable problems [0.30458514384586394]
  The algorithm is based on the radial basis function of Gutmann and the metric response surface method of Regis and Shoemaker. We propose several modifications aimed at generalizing and improving these two algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-04T13:36:56Z)
• EOS: a Parallel, Self-Adaptive, Multi-Population Evolutionary Algorithm for Constrained Global Optimization [68.8204255655161]
  EOS is a global optimization algorithm for constrained and unconstrained problems of real-valued variables. It implements a number of improvements to the well-known Differential Evolution (DE) algorithm. Results prove that EOSis capable of achieving increased performance compared to state-of-the-art single-population self-adaptive DE algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-09T10:19:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.