Assessing the Latent Automated Program Repair Capabilities of Large Language Models using Round-Trip Translation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.07994v2
• Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 11:26:34 GMT
• Title: Assessing the Latent Automated Program Repair Capabilities of Large Language Models using Round-Trip Translation
• Authors: Fernando Vallecillos Ruiz, Anastasiia Grishina, Max Hort, Leon Moonen,
• Abstract summary: We investigate Round-Trip Translation (RTT): translating code from one programming language into another programming or natural language and back.<n>We perform a detailed quantitative and qualitative analysis of RTT-generated patches in Java.<n>We find that RTT through English generates plausible patches for 100 of 164 bugs with GPT-4 on the HumanEval-Java benchmark, and 97 are found to be correct in our manual assessment.
• Score: 44.3761164214368
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Research shows that errors in natural language can be corrected by translating texts to another language and back using language models. We explore to what extent this latent correction capability extends to Automated Program Repair (APR) by investigating Round-Trip Translation (RTT): translating code from one programming language into another programming or natural language and back, using Large Language Models (LLMs). We hypothesize that RTT restores patterns most commonly seen in the LLM's training corpora through regression toward the mean, replacing infrequent bugs with more frequent, natural, bug-free code. To test this hypothesis, we employ nine LLMs and four common APR benchmarks in Java, and perform a detailed quantitative and qualitative analysis of RTT-generated patches. We find that RTT through English generates plausible patches for 100 of 164 bugs with GPT-4 on the HumanEval-Java benchmark, and 97 are found to be correct in our manual assessment. Moreover, RTT uniquely generates plausible patches for 46 bugs that were missed by LLMs specifically fine-tuned for APR. While this demonstrates the viability of RTT for APR, we also observe limitations, such as a lower overall bug fix rate than the state-of-the-art and diluting the original coding style. We analyze the impact of these limitations and discuss the potential of using RTT as a complementary component in APR frameworks. A replication package is available for download from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10500593. Keywords: automated program repair, large language model, machine translation

Related papers

• REFINE: Enhancing Program Repair Agents through Context-Aware Patch Refinement [12.995571513415905]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently shown strong potential in automatic program repair (APR)<n>LLMs often struggle to produce correct fixes due to limited understanding of code context and over-reliance on incomplete test suites.<n>We propose a novel patch refinement framework, Refine, that systematically transforms Draft Patches into correct ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-04T00:34:32Z)
• Automated Repair of C Programs Using Large Language Models [0.0]
  This study explores the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) in automating the repair of C programs.<n>We present a framework that integrates spectrum-based fault localization (SBFL), runtime feedback, and Chain-of-Thought-structured prompting into an autonomous repair loop.<n>Our approach achieves 44.93% repair accuracy, representing a 3.61% absolute improvement over strong state-of-the-art APR baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-02T04:34:11Z)
• Do AI models help produce verified bug fixes? [62.985237003585674]
  Large Language Models are used to produce corrections to software bugs.<n>This paper investigates how programmers use Large Language Models to complement their own skills.<n>The results are a first step towards a proper role for AI and LLMs in providing guaranteed-correct fixes to program bugs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-21T17:30:16Z)
• Specification-Guided Repair of Arithmetic Errors in Dafny Programs using LLMs [84.30534714651093]
  We present an innovative APR tool for Dafny, a verification-aware programming language.<n>We localize faults through a series of steps, which include using Hoare Logic to determine the state of each statement within the program.<n>We evaluate our approach using DafnyBench, a benchmark of real-world Dafny programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-04T15:36:12Z)
• Revisiting Unnaturalness for Automated Program Repair in the Era of Large Language Models [9.454475517867817]
  We propose a patch-naturalness measurement, entropy-delta, to improve the efficiency of template-based repair techniques. Our proposed method can rank correct patches more effectively than state-of-the-art machine learning tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T17:12:45Z)
• T5APR: Empowering Automated Program Repair across Languages through Checkpoint Ensemble [2.7036595757881323]
  We propose T5APR, a novel neural program repair approach that provides a unified solution for bug fixing across multiple programming languages. T5APR correctly fixes 1,985 bugs, including 1,442 bugs that none of the compared techniques has fixed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T15:54:08Z)
• Guess & Sketch: Language Model Guided Transpilation [59.02147255276078]
  Learned transpilation offers an alternative to manual re-writing and engineering efforts. Probabilistic neural language models (LMs) produce plausible outputs for every input, but do so at the cost of guaranteed correctness. Guess & Sketch extracts alignment and confidence information from features of the LM then passes it to a symbolic solver to resolve semantic equivalence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-25T15:42:18Z)
• RAP-Gen: Retrieval-Augmented Patch Generation with CodeT5 for Automatic Program Repair [75.40584530380589]
  We propose a novel Retrieval-Augmented Patch Generation framework (RAP-Gen) RAP-Gen explicitly leveraging relevant fix patterns retrieved from a list of previous bug-fix pairs. We evaluate RAP-Gen on three benchmarks in two programming languages, including the TFix benchmark in JavaScript, and Code Refinement and Defects4J benchmarks in Java.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-12T08:52:56Z)
• Enhancing Automated Program Repair through Fine-tuning and Prompt Engineering [2.3826139428423576]
  Sequence-to-sequence models have been used to transform erroneous programs into correct ones when trained with a large enough dataset. Some recent studies demonstrated strong empirical evidence that code review could improve the program repair further. We investigate if this inherent knowledge of PL and NL can be utilized to improve automated program repair.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-16T17:29:51Z)
• Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debug [62.424077000154945]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance on code generation. We propose Self- Debugging, which teaches a large language model to debug its predicted program via few-shot demonstrations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-11T10:43:43Z)
• LEVER: Learning to Verify Language-to-Code Generation with Execution [64.36459105535]
  We propose LEVER, a simple approach to improve language-to-code generation by learning to verify the generated programs with their execution results. Specifically, we train verifiers to determine whether a program sampled from the LLMs is correct or not based on the natural language input, the program itself and its execution results. LEVER consistently improves over the base code LLMs(4.6% to 10.9% with code-davinci) and achieves new state-of-the-art results on all of them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-16T18:23:22Z)
• Conversational Automated Program Repair [10.071615423169902]
  We propose a new paradigm for program repair that alternates between patch generation and validation in a conversational manner. We leverage the long-term context window of Large Pre-Trained Language Models to not only avoid generating previously incorrect patches but also incorporate validation feedback to help the model understand the semantic meaning of the program under test.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T19:22:36Z)
• BigIssue: A Realistic Bug Localization Benchmark [89.8240118116093]
  BigIssue is a benchmark for realistic bug localization. We provide a general benchmark with a diversity of real and synthetic Java bugs. We hope to advance the state of the art in bug localization, in turn improving APR performance and increasing its applicability to the modern development cycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-21T20:17:53Z)
• AVATAR: A Parallel Corpus for Java-Python Program Translation [77.86173793901139]
  Program translation refers to migrating source code from one language to another. We present AVATAR, a collection of 9,515 programming problems and their solutions written in two popular languages, Java and Python.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-26T05:44:20Z)
• Zero-Shot Cross-lingual Semantic Parsing [56.95036511882921]
  We study cross-lingual semantic parsing as a zero-shot problem without parallel data for 7 test languages. We propose a multi-task encoder-decoder model to transfer parsing knowledge to additional languages using only English-Logical form paired data. Our system frames zero-shot parsing as a latent-space alignment problem and finds that pre-trained models can be improved to generate logical forms with minimal cross-lingual transfer penalty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-15T16:08:43Z)
• Pre-training Multilingual Neural Machine Translation by Leveraging Alignment Information [72.2412707779571]
  mRASP is an approach to pre-train a universal multilingual neural machine translation model. We carry out experiments on 42 translation directions across a diverse setting, including low, medium, rich resource, and as well as transferring to exotic language pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-07T03:57:54Z)
• ENCORE: Ensemble Learning using Convolution Neural Machine Translation for Automatic Program Repair [7.026028136636735]
  We propose ENCORE, a new generate-and-validate (G&V) program repair technique. It uses ensemble learning on convolutional neural machine translation (NMT) models to automatically fix bugs in multiple programming languages. ENCORE is the first G&V repair technique to be applied to four popular programming languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-06-20T15:25:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.