Interrogating AI: Characterizing Emergent Playful Interactions with ChatGPT
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.08405v2
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 16:44:14 GMT
- Title: Interrogating AI: Characterizing Emergent Playful Interactions with ChatGPT
- Authors: Mohammad Ronagh Nikghalb, Jinghui Cheng,
- Abstract summary: Playful interactions with AI systems naturally emerged as an important way for users to make sense of the technology.
We target this gap by investigating playful interactions exhibited by users of an emerging AI technology, ChatGPT.
Through a thematic analysis of 372 user-generated posts on the ChatGPT subreddit, we found that more than half of user discourse revolves around playful interactions.
- Score: 10.907980864371213
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: In an era of AI's growing capabilities and influences, recent advancements are constantly reshaping HCI and CSCW's view of AI. Playful interactions with AI systems naturally emerged as an important way for users to make sense of the ever-changing technology. However, these emergent and playful interactions are underexamined. We target this gap by investigating playful interactions exhibited by users of an emerging AI technology, ChatGPT. Through a thematic analysis of 372 user-generated posts on the ChatGPT subreddit, we found that more than half of user discourse revolves around playful interactions. The analysis further allowed us to construct a preliminary framework to describe these interactions, categorizing them into six types: reflecting, jesting, imitating, challenging, tricking, and contriving; each included sub-categories. This study contributes to the field of HCI and CSCW by illuminating the multifaceted nature of playful interactions with AI, underlining their significance in helping users assess AI agency, shaping the human-AI relationship, and offering rich implications to AI system design.
Related papers
- Designing and Evaluating Dialogue LLMs for Co-Creative Improvised Theatre [48.19823828240628]
This study presents Large Language Models (LLMs) deployed in a month-long live show at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe.
We explore the technical capabilities and constraints of on-the-spot multi-party dialogue.
Our human-in-the-loop methodology underlines the challenges of these LLMs in generating context-relevant responses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-11T23:19:42Z) - What should I say? -- Interacting with AI and Natural Language
Interfaces [0.0]
The Human-AI Interaction (HAI) sub-field has emerged from the Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) field and aims to examine this very notion.
Prior research suggests that theory of mind representations are crucial to successful and effortless communication, however very little is understood when it comes to how theory of mind representations are established when interacting with AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-12T05:10:23Z) - Human-AI collaboration is not very collaborative yet: A taxonomy of interaction patterns in AI-assisted decision making from a systematic review [6.013543974938446]
Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in decision support systems has disproportionately focused on technological advancements.
A human-centered perspective attempts to alleviate this concern by designing AI solutions for seamless integration with existing processes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-30T17:46:38Z) - Human-AI Coevolution [48.74579595505374]
Coevolution AI is a process in which humans and AI algorithms continuously influence each other.
This paper introduces Coevolution AI as the cornerstone for a new field of study at the intersection between AI and complexity science.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-23T18:10:54Z) - A Mental-Model Centric Landscape of Human-AI Symbiosis [31.14516396625931]
We introduce a significantly general version of human-aware AI interaction scheme, called generalized human-aware interaction (GHAI)
We will see how this new framework allows us to capture the various works done in the space of human-AI interaction and identify the fundamental behavioral patterns supported by these works.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-18T22:08:08Z) - On some Foundational Aspects of Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence [52.03866242565846]
There is no clear definition of what is meant by Human Centered Artificial Intelligence.
This paper introduces the term HCAI agent to refer to any physical or software computational agent equipped with AI components.
We see the notion of HCAI agent, together with its components and functions, as a way to bridge the technical and non-technical discussions on human-centered AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-29T09:58:59Z) - A User-Centred Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence in
Human-Robot Interaction [70.11080854486953]
We propose a user-centred framework for XAI that focuses on its social-interactive aspect.
The framework aims to provide a structure for interactive XAI solutions thought for non-expert users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-27T09:56:23Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z) - Adversarial Interaction Attack: Fooling AI to Misinterpret Human
Intentions [46.87576410532481]
We show that, despite their current huge success, deep learning based AI systems can be easily fooled by subtle adversarial noise.
Based on a case study of skeleton-based human interactions, we propose a novel adversarial attack on interactions.
Our study highlights potential risks in the interaction loop with AI and humans, which need to be carefully addressed when deploying AI systems in safety-critical applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-17T16:23:20Z) - Player-AI Interaction: What Neural Network Games Reveal About AI as Play [14.63311356668699]
This paper argues that games are an ideal domain for studying and experimenting with how humans interact with AI.
Through a systematic survey of neural network games, we identified the dominant interaction metaphors and AI interaction patterns.
Our work suggests that game and UX designers should consider flow to structure the learning curve of human-AI interaction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-15T17:07:03Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.