Unlocking Unlabeled Data: Ensemble Learning with the Hui- Walter Paradigm for Performance Estimation in Online and Static Settings

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.09376v1
• Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 17:46:10 GMT
• Title: Unlocking Unlabeled Data: Ensemble Learning with the Hui- Walter Paradigm for Performance Estimation in Online and Static Settings
• Authors: Kevin Slote, Elaine Lee
• Abstract summary: We adapt the Hui-Walter paradigm, a method traditionally applied in epidemiology and medicine, to the field of machine learning. We estimate key performance metrics such as false positive rate, false negative rate, and priors in scenarios where no ground truth is available.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In the realm of machine learning and statistical modeling, practitioners often work under the assumption of accessible, static, labeled data for evaluation and training. However, this assumption often deviates from reality where data may be private, encrypted, difficult- to-measure, or unlabeled. In this paper, we bridge this gap by adapting the Hui-Walter paradigm, a method traditionally applied in epidemiology and medicine, to the field of machine learning. This approach enables us to estimate key performance metrics such as false positive rate, false negative rate, and priors in scenarios where no ground truth is available. We further extend this paradigm for handling online data, opening up new possibilities for dynamic data environments. Our methodology involves partitioning data into latent classes to simulate multiple data populations (if natural populations are unavailable) and independently training models to replicate multiple tests. By cross-tabulating binary outcomes across ensemble categorizers and multiple populations, we are able to estimate unknown parameters through Gibbs sampling, eliminating the need for ground-truth or labeled data. This paper showcases the potential of our methodology to transform machine learning practices by allowing for accurate model assessment under dynamic and uncertain data conditions.

Related papers

• Stochastic Amortization: A Unified Approach to Accelerate Feature and Data Attribution [67.28273187033693]
  We show that training a network that directly predicts the desired output, known as amortization, is inexpensive and surprisingly effective. This approach significantly accelerates several feature attribution and data valuation methods, often yielding an order of magnitude speedup over existing approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T03:42:37Z)
• Exploring Data Redundancy in Real-world Image Classification through Data Selection [20.389636181891515]
  Deep learning models often require large amounts of data for training, leading to increased costs. We present two data valuation metrics based on Synaptic Intelligence and gradient norms, respectively, to study redundancy in real-world image data. Online and offline data selection algorithms are then proposed via clustering and grouping based on the examined data values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-25T03:31:05Z)
• Synthetic Model Combination: An Instance-wise Approach to Unsupervised Ensemble Learning [92.89846887298852]
  Consider making a prediction over new test data without any opportunity to learn from a training set of labelled data. Give access to a set of expert models and their predictions alongside some limited information about the dataset used to train them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-11T10:20:31Z)
• A Data-Driven Method for Automated Data Superposition with Applications in Soft Matter Science [0.0]
  We develop a data-driven, non-parametric method for superposing experimental data with arbitrary coordinate transformations. Our method produces interpretable data-driven models that may inform applications such as materials classification, design, and discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-20T14:58:04Z)
• Data-SUITE: Data-centric identification of in-distribution incongruous examples [81.21462458089142]
  Data-SUITE is a data-centric framework to identify incongruous regions of in-distribution (ID) data. We empirically validate Data-SUITE's performance and coverage guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-17T18:58:31Z)
• Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performance [63.740181251997306]
  Real-world machine learning deployments are characterized by mismatches between the source (training) and target (test) distributions. In this work, we investigate methods for predicting the target domain accuracy using only labeled source data and unlabeled target data. We propose Average Thresholded Confidence (ATC), a practical method that learns a threshold on the model's confidence, predicting accuracy as the fraction of unlabeled examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T23:01:12Z)
• Managing dataset shift by adversarial validation for credit scoring [5.560471251954645]
  The inconsistency between the distribution of training data and the data that actually needs to be predicted is likely to cause poor model performance. We propose a method based on adversarial validation to alleviate the dataset shift problem in credit scoring scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-19T07:07:15Z)
• Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty and Robustness to Distributional Shift Using Real World Data [0.0]
  We propose metrics for general regression tasks using the Shifts Weather Prediction dataset. We also present an evaluation of the baseline methods using these metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-08T17:32:10Z)
• Self Training with Ensemble of Teacher Models [8.257085583227695]
  In order to train robust deep learning models, large amounts of labelled data is required. In the absence of such large repositories of labelled data, unlabeled data can be exploited for the same. Semi-Supervised learning aims to utilize such unlabeled data for training classification models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-17T09:44:09Z)
• Scalable Marginal Likelihood Estimation for Model Selection in Deep Learning [78.83598532168256]
  Marginal-likelihood based model-selection is rarely used in deep learning due to estimation difficulties. Our work shows that marginal likelihoods can improve generalization and be useful when validation data is unavailable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-11T09:50:24Z)
• BREEDS: Benchmarks for Subpopulation Shift [98.90314444545204]
  We develop a methodology for assessing the robustness of models to subpopulation shift. We leverage the class structure underlying existing datasets to control the data subpopulations that comprise the training and test distributions. Applying this methodology to the ImageNet dataset, we create a suite of subpopulation shift benchmarks of varying granularity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-11T17:04:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.