Understanding Biases in ChatGPT-based Recommender Systems: Provider Fairness, Temporal Stability, and Recency

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.10545v3
• Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:59:01 GMT
• Title: Understanding Biases in ChatGPT-based Recommender Systems: Provider Fairness, Temporal Stability, and Recency
• Authors: Yashar Deldjoo,
• Abstract summary: This paper explores the biases in ChatGPT-based recommender systems, focusing on provider fairness (item-side fairness) In the first experiment, we assess seven distinct prompt scenarios on top-K recommendation accuracy and fairness. Embedding fairness into system roles, such as "act as a fair recommender," proved more effective than fairness directives within prompts.
• Score: 9.882829614199453
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper explores the biases in ChatGPT-based recommender systems, focusing on provider fairness (item-side fairness). Through extensive experiments and over a thousand API calls, we investigate the impact of prompt design strategies-including structure, system role, and intent-on evaluation metrics such as provider fairness, catalog coverage, temporal stability, and recency. The first experiment examines these strategies in classical top-K recommendations, while the second evaluates sequential in-context learning (ICL). In the first experiment, we assess seven distinct prompt scenarios on top-K recommendation accuracy and fairness. Accuracy-oriented prompts, like Simple and Chain-of-Thought (COT), outperform diversification prompts, which, despite enhancing temporal freshness, reduce accuracy by up to 50%. Embedding fairness into system roles, such as "act as a fair recommender," proved more effective than fairness directives within prompts. Diversification prompts led to recommending newer movies, offering broader genre distribution compared to traditional collaborative filtering (CF) models. The second experiment explores sequential ICL, comparing zero-shot and few-shot ICL. Results indicate that including user demographic information in prompts affects model biases and stereotypes. However, ICL did not consistently improve item fairness and catalog coverage over zero-shot learning. Zero-shot learning achieved higher NDCG and coverage, while ICL-2 showed slight improvements in hit rate (HR) when age-group context was included. Our study provides insights into biases of RecLLMs, particularly in provider fairness and catalog coverage. By examining prompt design, learning strategies, and system roles, we highlight the potential and challenges of integrating LLMs into recommendation systems. Further details can be found at https://github.com/yasdel/Benchmark_RecLLM_Fairness.

Related papers

• FairDgcl: Fairness-aware Recommendation with Dynamic Graph Contrastive Learning [48.38344934125999]
  We study how to implement high-quality data augmentation to improve recommendation fairness. Specifically, we propose FairDgcl, a dynamic graph adversarial contrastive learning framework. We show that FairDgcl can simultaneously generate enhanced representations that possess both fairness and accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T04:43:03Z)
• A Thorough Performance Benchmarking on Lightweight Embedding-based Recommender Systems [67.52782366565658]
  State-of-the-art recommender systems (RSs) depend on categorical features, which ecoded by embedding vectors, resulting in excessively large embedding tables. Despite the prosperity of lightweight embedding-based RSs, a wide diversity is seen in evaluation protocols. This study investigates various LERS' performance, efficiency, and cross-task transferability via a thorough benchmarking process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T07:45:00Z)
• Can Many-Shot In-Context Learning Help LLMs as Evaluators? A Preliminary Empirical Study [14.906150451947443]
  We study two many-shot ICL prompts for helping evaluators to mitigate the potential biases in Large Language Models (LLMs) Based on the designed prompts, we investigate the impact of scaling the number of in-context examples on the consistency and quality of the evaluation results. Experimental results show that advanced LLMs, such as GPT-4o, perform better in the many-shot regime than in the zero-shot regime.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T15:11:58Z)
• A Normative Framework for Benchmarking Consumer Fairness in Large Language Model Recommender System [9.470545149911072]
  This paper proposes a normative framework to benchmark consumer fairness in LLM-powered recommender systems. We argue that this gap can lead to arbitrary conclusions about fairness. Experiments on the MovieLens dataset on consumer fairness reveal fairness deviations in age-based recommendations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T16:25:27Z)
• Take Care of Your Prompt Bias! Investigating and Mitigating Prompt Bias in Factual Knowledge Extraction [56.17020601803071]
  Recent research shows that pre-trained language models (PLMs) suffer from "prompt bias" in factual knowledge extraction. This paper aims to improve the reliability of existing benchmarks by thoroughly investigating and mitigating prompt bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T02:04:35Z)
• Learning Fair Ranking Policies via Differentiable Optimization of Ordered Weighted Averages [55.04219793298687]
  This paper shows how efficiently-solvable fair ranking models can be integrated into the training loop of Learning to Rank. In particular, this paper is the first to show how to backpropagate through constrained optimizations of OWA objectives, enabling their use in integrated prediction and decision models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T20:53:53Z)
• Is ChatGPT Fair for Recommendation? Evaluating Fairness in Large Language Model Recommendation [52.62492168507781]
  We propose a novel benchmark called Fairness of Recommendation via LLM (FaiRLLM) This benchmark comprises carefully crafted metrics and a dataset that accounts for eight sensitive attributes. By utilizing our FaiRLLM benchmark, we conducted an evaluation of ChatGPT and discovered that it still exhibits unfairness to some sensitive attributes when generating recommendations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-12T16:54:36Z)
• FairRec: Fairness Testing for Deep Recommender Systems [21.420524191767335]
  We propose a unified framework that supports fairness testing of deep learning-based recommender systems. We also propose a novel, efficient search-based testing approach to tackle the new challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-14T09:49:55Z)
• Comprehensive Fair Meta-learned Recommender System [39.04926584648665]
  We propose a comprehensive fair meta-learning framework, named CLOVER, for ensuring the fairness of meta-learned recommendation models. Our framework offers a generic training paradigm that is applicable to different meta-learned recommender systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-09T22:48:35Z)
• Contrastive Learning for Debiased Candidate Generation in Large-Scale Recommender Systems [84.3996727203154]
  We show that a popular choice of contrastive loss is equivalent to reducing the exposure bias via inverse propensity weighting. We further improve upon CLRec and propose Multi-CLRec, for accurate multi-intention aware bias reduction. Our methods have been successfully deployed in Taobao, where at least four-month online A/B tests and offline analyses demonstrate its substantial improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-20T08:15:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.