Crowd-PrefRL: Preference-Based Reward Learning from Crowds

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.10941v2
• Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 12:18:18 GMT
• Title: Crowd-PrefRL: Preference-Based Reward Learning from Crowds
• Authors: David Chhan, Ellen Novoseller, Vernon J. Lawhern,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a conceptual framework, Crowd-PrefRL, that integrates preference-based reinforcement learning approaches with crowdsourcing techniques.<n>Preliminary results suggest that Crowd-PrefRL can learn reward functions and agent policies from preference feedback provided by crowds of unknown expertise and reliability.<n>Results suggest that our method can identify the presence of minority viewpoints within the crowd in an unsupervised manner.
• Score: 0.4439066410935887
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Preference-based reinforcement learning (RL) provides a framework to train AI agents using human feedback through preferences over pairs of behaviors, enabling agents to learn desired behaviors when it is difficult to specify a numerical reward function. While this paradigm leverages human feedback, it typically treats the feedback as given by a single human user. However, different users may desire multiple AI behaviors and modes of interaction. Meanwhile, incorporating preference feedback from crowds (i.e. ensembles of users) in a robust manner remains a challenge, and the problem of training RL agents using feedback from multiple human users remains understudied. In this work, we introduce a conceptual framework, Crowd-PrefRL, that integrates preference-based RL approaches with techniques from unsupervised crowdsourcing to enable training of autonomous system behaviors from crowdsourced feedback. We show preliminary results suggesting that Crowd-PrefRL can learn reward functions and agent policies from preference feedback provided by crowds of unknown expertise and reliability. We also show that in most cases, agents trained with Crowd-PrefRL outperform agents trained with majority-vote preferences or preferences from any individual user, especially when the spread of user error rates among the crowd is large. Results further suggest that our method can identify the presence of minority viewpoints within the crowd in an unsupervised manner.

Related papers

• PB$^2$: Preference Space Exploration via Population-Based Methods in Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning [2.0373030742807545]
  We identify and address this preference exploration problem through population-based methods.<n>We demonstrate that maintaining a diverse population of agents enables more comprehensive exploration of the preference landscape.<n>This diversity improves reward model learning by generating preference queries with clearly distinguishable behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-16T17:51:33Z)
• Reward Learning from Multiple Feedback Types [7.910064218813772]
  We show that diverse types of feedback can be utilized and lead to strong reward modeling performance. This work is the first strong indicator of the potential of multi-type feedback for RLHF.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-28T13:29:54Z)
• Personalizing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Variational Preference Learning [12.742158403867002]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback is a powerful paradigm for aligning foundation models to human values and preferences. Current RLHF techniques cannot account for the naturally occurring differences in individual human preferences across a diverse population. We develop a class of multimodal RLHF methods to address the need for pluralistic alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T15:18:30Z)
• Provable Multi-Party Reinforcement Learning with Diverse Human Feedback [63.830731470186855]
  Reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) is an emerging paradigm to align models with human preferences. We show how traditional RLHF approaches can fail since learning a single reward function cannot capture and balance the preferences of multiple individuals. We incorporate meta-learning to learn multiple preferences and adopt different social welfare functions to aggregate the preferences across multiple parties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T03:05:11Z)
• MaxMin-RLHF: Towards Equitable Alignment of Large Language Models with Diverse Human Preferences [101.57443597426374]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) aligns language models to human preferences by employing a singular reward model derived from preference data. We learn a mixture of preference distributions via an expectation-maximization algorithm to better represent diverse human preferences. Our algorithm achieves an average improvement of more than 16% in win-rates over conventional RLHF algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T03:56:27Z)
• Sample Efficient Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback via Active Exploration [29.935758027209292]
  Preference-based feedback is important for many applications in reinforcement learning. In this work, we take advantage of the fact that one can often choose contexts to obtain human feedback. We show that our method is able to reach better performance with fewer samples of human preferences than multiple baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-01T00:54:02Z)
• Reinforcement Learning from Statistical Feedback: the Journey from AB Testing to ANT Testing [1.1142354615369272]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has played a crucial role in the success of large models such as ChatGPT. We will attempt to fill this gap with statistical business feedback instead of human feedback, using AB testing. Statistical inference methods are used to obtain preferences for training the reward network, which fine-tunes the pre-trained model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-24T07:50:52Z)
• Improving Generalization of Alignment with Human Preferences through Group Invariant Learning [56.19242260613749]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) enables the generation of responses more aligned with human preferences. Previous work shows that Reinforcement Learning (RL) often exploits shortcuts to attain high rewards and overlooks challenging samples. We propose a novel approach that can learn a consistent policy via RL across various data groups or domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T13:54:15Z)
• Reinforcement Learning from Diverse Human Preferences [68.4294547285359]
  This paper develops a method for crowd-sourcing preference labels and learning from diverse human preferences. The proposed method is tested on a variety of tasks in DMcontrol and Meta-world. It has shown consistent and significant improvements over existing preference-based RL algorithms when learning from diverse feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-27T15:18:54Z)
• Personalizing Intervened Network for Long-tailed Sequential User Behavior Modeling [66.02953670238647]
  Tail users suffer from significantly lower-quality recommendation than the head users after joint training. A model trained on tail users separately still achieve inferior results due to limited data. We propose a novel approach that significantly improves the recommendation performance of the tail users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-19T02:50:19Z)
• Reward Uncertainty for Exploration in Preference-based Reinforcement Learning [88.34958680436552]
  We present an exploration method specifically for preference-based reinforcement learning algorithms. Our main idea is to design an intrinsic reward by measuring the novelty based on learned reward. Our experiments show that exploration bonus from uncertainty in learned reward improves both feedback- and sample-efficiency of preference-based RL algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T23:22:10Z)
• PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-training [94.87393610927812]
  We present an off-policy, interactive reinforcement learning algorithm that capitalizes on the strengths of both feedback and off-policy learning. We demonstrate that our approach is capable of learning tasks of higher complexity than previously considered by human-in-the-loop methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T14:10:50Z)
• Partial Bandit and Semi-Bandit: Making the Most Out of Scarce Users' Feedback [62.997667081978825]
  We present a novel approach for considering user feedback and evaluate it using three distinct strategies. Despite a limited number of feedbacks returned by users (as low as 20% of the total), our approach obtains similar results to those of state of the art approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-16T07:32:51Z)
• Accelerating Reinforcement Learning Agent with EEG-based Implicit Human Feedback [10.138798960466222]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents with human feedback can dramatically improve various aspects of learning. Previous methods require human observer to give inputs explicitly, burdening the human in the loop of RL agent's learning process. We investigate capturing human's intrinsic reactions as implicit (and natural) feedback through EEG in the form of error-related potentials (ErrP)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-30T03:13:37Z)
• Self-Supervised Reinforcement Learning for Recommender Systems [77.38665506495553]
  We propose self-supervised reinforcement learning for sequential recommendation tasks. Our approach augments standard recommendation models with two output layers: one for self-supervised learning and the other for RL. Based on such an approach, we propose two frameworks namely Self-Supervised Q-learning(SQN) and Self-Supervised Actor-Critic(SAC)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T11:18:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.