Inference Attacks Against Face Recognition Model without Classification Layers

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.13719v1
• Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 09:51:03 GMT
• Title: Inference Attacks Against Face Recognition Model without Classification Layers
• Authors: Yuanqing Huang, Huilong Chen, Yinggui Wang, Lei Wang
• Abstract summary: Face recognition (FR) has been applied to nearly every aspect of daily life, but it is always accompanied by the underlying risk of leaking private information. In this work, we advocate a novel inference attack composed of two stages for practical FR models without a classification layer.
• Score: 2.775761045299829
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Face recognition (FR) has been applied to nearly every aspect of daily life, but it is always accompanied by the underlying risk of leaking private information. At present, almost all attack models against FR rely heavily on the presence of a classification layer. However, in practice, the FR model can obtain complex features of the input via the model backbone, and then compare it with the target for inference, which does not explicitly involve the outputs of the classification layer adopting logit or other losses. In this work, we advocate a novel inference attack composed of two stages for practical FR models without a classification layer. The first stage is the membership inference attack. Specifically, We analyze the distances between the intermediate features and batch normalization (BN) parameters. The results indicate that this distance is a critical metric for membership inference. We thus design a simple but effective attack model that can determine whether a face image is from the training dataset or not. The second stage is the model inversion attack, where sensitive private data is reconstructed using a pre-trained generative adversarial network (GAN) guided by the attack model in the first stage. To the best of our knowledge, the proposed attack model is the very first in the literature developed for FR models without a classification layer. We illustrate the application of the proposed attack model in the establishment of privacy-preserving FR techniques.

Related papers

• Model Inversion Attacks Through Target-Specific Conditional Diffusion Models [54.69008212790426]
  Model inversion attacks (MIAs) aim to reconstruct private images from a target classifier's training set, thereby raising privacy concerns in AI applications. Previous GAN-based MIAs tend to suffer from inferior generative fidelity due to GAN's inherent flaws and biased optimization within latent space. We propose Diffusion-based Model Inversion (Diff-MI) attacks to alleviate these issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T06:38:49Z)
• FACTUAL: A Novel Framework for Contrastive Learning Based Robust SAR Image Classification [10.911464455072391]
  FACTUAL is a Contrastive Learning framework for Adversarial Training and robust SAR classification. Our model achieves 99.7% accuracy on clean samples, and 89.6% on perturbed samples, both outperforming previous state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T06:20:22Z)
• Activate and Reject: Towards Safe Domain Generalization under Category Shift [71.95548187205736]
  We study a practical problem of Domain Generalization under Category Shift (DGCS) It aims to simultaneously detect unknown-class samples and classify known-class samples in the target domains. Compared to prior DG works, we face two new challenges: 1) how to learn the concept of unknown'' during training with only source known-class samples, and 2) how to adapt the source-trained model to unseen environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-07T07:53:12Z)
• RanPAC: Random Projections and Pre-trained Models for Continual Learning [59.07316955610658]
  Continual learning (CL) aims to learn different tasks (such as classification) in a non-stationary data stream without forgetting old ones. We propose a concise and effective approach for CL with pre-trained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-05T12:49:02Z)
• Deconstructing Classifiers: Towards A Data Reconstruction Attack Against Text Classification Models [2.9735729003555345]
  We propose a new targeted data reconstruction attack called the Mix And Match attack. This work highlights the importance of considering the privacy risks associated with data reconstruction attacks in classification models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-23T21:25:38Z)
• Defense-Prefix for Preventing Typographic Attacks on CLIP [14.832208701208414]
  Some adversarial attacks fool a model into false or absurd classifications. We introduce our simple yet effective method: Defense-Prefix (DP), which inserts the DP token before a class name to make words "robust" against typographic attacks. Our method significantly improves the accuracy of classification tasks for typographic attack datasets, while maintaining the zero-shot capabilities of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-10T11:05:20Z)
• TWINS: A Fine-Tuning Framework for Improved Transferability of Adversarial Robustness and Generalization [89.54947228958494]
  This paper focuses on the fine-tuning of an adversarially pre-trained model in various classification tasks. We propose a novel statistics-based approach, Two-WIng NormliSation (TWINS) fine-tuning framework. TWINS is shown to be effective on a wide range of image classification datasets in terms of both generalization and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T14:12:55Z)
• RelaxLoss: Defending Membership Inference Attacks without Losing Utility [68.48117818874155]
  We propose a novel training framework based on a relaxed loss with a more achievable learning target. RelaxLoss is applicable to any classification model with added benefits of easy implementation and negligible overhead. Our approach consistently outperforms state-of-the-art defense mechanisms in terms of resilience against MIAs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-12T19:34:47Z)
• One Parameter Defense -- Defending against Data Inference Attacks via Differential Privacy [26.000487178636927]
  Machine learning models are vulnerable to data inference attacks, such as membership inference and model inversion attacks. Most existing defense methods only protect against membership inference attacks. We propose a differentially private defense method that handles both types of attacks in a time-efficient manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-13T06:06:24Z)
• Sampling Attacks: Amplification of Membership Inference Attacks by Repeated Queries [74.59376038272661]
  We introduce sampling attack, a novel membership inference technique that unlike other standard membership adversaries is able to work under severe restriction of no access to scores of the victim model. We show that a victim model that only publishes the labels is still susceptible to sampling attacks and the adversary can recover up to 100% of its performance. For defense, we choose differential privacy in the form of gradient perturbation during the training of the victim model as well as output perturbation at prediction time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-01T12:54:54Z)
• Leveraging Siamese Networks for One-Shot Intrusion Detection Model [0.0]
  Supervised Machine Learning (ML) to enhance Intrusion Detection Systems has been the subject of significant research. retraining the models in-situ renders the network susceptible to attacks owing to the time-window required to acquire a sufficient volume of data. Here, a complementary approach referred to as 'One-Shot Learning', whereby a limited number of examples of a new attack-class is used to identify a new attack-class. A Siamese Network is trained to differentiate between classes based on pairs similarities, rather than features, allowing to identify new and previously unseen attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-27T11:40:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.