An Investigation of Hardware Security Bug Characteristics in Open-Source Projects
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.00684v1
- Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 15:47:01 GMT
- Title: An Investigation of Hardware Security Bug Characteristics in Open-Source Projects
- Authors: Joey Ah-kiow, Benjamin Tan,
- Abstract summary: We perform a deep dive into the popular OpenTitan project, including its bug reports and bug fixes.
We manually classify the bugs as relevant to functionality or security and analyze characteristics, such as the impact and location of security bugs.
Our results show that 53% of the bugs in OpenTitan have potential security implications and that 55% of all bug fixes modify only one file.
- Score: 4.526103806673449
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Hardware security is an important concern of system security as vulnerabilities can arise from design errors introduced throughout the development lifecycle. Recent works have proposed techniques to detect hardware security bugs, such as static analysis, fuzzing, and symbolic execution. However, the fundamental properties of hardware security bugs remain relatively unexplored. To gain a better understanding of hardware security bugs, we perform a deep dive into the popular OpenTitan project, including its bug reports and bug fixes. We manually classify the bugs as relevant to functionality or security and analyze characteristics, such as the impact and location of security bugs, and the size of their bug fixes. We also investigate relationships between security impact and bug management during development. Finally, we propose an abstract syntax tree-based analysis to identify the syntactic characteristics of bug fixes. Our results show that 53% of the bugs in OpenTitan have potential security implications and that 55% of all bug fixes modify only one file. Our findings underscore the importance of security-aware development practices and tools and motivate the development of techniques that leverage the highly localized nature of hardware bugs.
Related papers
- Yuga: Automatically Detecting Lifetime Annotation Bugs in the Rust
Language [16.56604332678692]
Security vulnerabilities have been reported in Rust projects, often attributed to the use of "unsafe" Rust code.
These vulnerabilities, in part, arise from incorrect lifetime annotations on function signatures.
Existing tools fail to detect these bugs, primarily because such bugs are rare, challenging to detect through dynamic analysis.
We devise a novel static analysis tool, Yuga, to detect potential lifetime annotation bugs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-12T17:05:03Z) - A Novel Approach to Identify Security Controls in Source Code [4.598579706242066]
This paper enumerates a comprehensive list of commonly used security controls and creates a dataset for each one of them.
It uses the state-of-the-art NLP technique Bidirectional Representations from Transformers (BERT) and the Tactic Detector from our prior work to show that security controls could be identified with high confidence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-10T21:14:39Z) - Automatic Static Bug Detection for Machine Learning Libraries: Are We
There Yet? [14.917820383894124]
We analyze five popular and widely used static bug detectors, i.e., Flawfinder, RATS, Cppcheck, Facebook Infer, and Clang, on a curated dataset of software bugs.
Overall, our study shows that static bug detectors find a negligible amount of all bugs accounting for 6/410 bugs (0.01%), Flawfinder and RATS are the most effective static checker for finding software bugs in machine learning libraries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-09T01:38:52Z) - Security Defect Detection via Code Review: A Study of the OpenStack and
Qt Communities [7.2944322548786715]
Security defects are not prevalently discussed in code review.
More than half of the reviewers provided explicit fixing strategies/solutions to help developers fix security defects.
Disagreement between the developer and the reviewer are the main causes for not resolving security defects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-05T14:30:41Z) - On the Security Blind Spots of Software Composition Analysis [46.1389163921338]
We present a novel approach to detect vulnerable clones in the Maven repository.
We retrieve over 53k potential vulnerable clones from Maven Central.
We detect 727 confirmed vulnerable clones and synthesize a testable proof-of-vulnerability project for each of those.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-08T20:14:46Z) - A survey on hardware-based malware detection approaches [45.24207460381396]
Hardware-based malware detection approaches leverage hardware performance counters and machine learning prowess.
We meticulously analyze the approach, unraveling the most common methods, algorithms, tools, and datasets that shape its contours.
The discussion extends to crafting mixed hardware and software approaches for collaborative efficacy, essential enhancements in hardware monitoring units, and a better understanding of the correlation between hardware events and malware applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-22T13:00:41Z) - Using Developer Discussions to Guide Fixing Bugs in Software [51.00904399653609]
We propose using bug report discussions, which are available before the task is performed and are also naturally occurring, avoiding the need for additional information from developers.
We demonstrate that various forms of natural language context derived from such discussions can aid bug-fixing, even leading to improved performance over using commit messages corresponding to the oracle bug-fixing commits.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-11T16:37:33Z) - ObjectSeeker: Certifiably Robust Object Detection against Patch Hiding
Attacks via Patch-agnostic Masking [95.6347501381882]
Object detectors are found to be vulnerable to physical-world patch hiding attacks.
We propose ObjectSeeker as a framework for building certifiably robust object detectors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-03T19:34:25Z) - Early Detection of Security-Relevant Bug Reports using Machine Learning:
How Far Are We? [6.438136820117887]
In a typical maintenance scenario, security-relevant bug reports are prioritised by the development team when preparing corrective patches.
Open security-relevant bug reports can become a critical leak of sensitive information that attackers can leverage to perform zero-day attacks.
In recent years, approaches for the detection of security-relevant bug reports based on machine learning have been reported with promising performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-19T11:30:29Z) - Dos and Don'ts of Machine Learning in Computer Security [74.1816306998445]
Despite great potential, machine learning in security is prone to subtle pitfalls that undermine its performance.
We identify common pitfalls in the design, implementation, and evaluation of learning-based security systems.
We propose actionable recommendations to support researchers in avoiding or mitigating the pitfalls where possible.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-19T13:09:31Z) - Autosploit: A Fully Automated Framework for Evaluating the
Exploitability of Security Vulnerabilities [47.748732208602355]
Autosploit is an automated framework for evaluating the exploitability of vulnerabilities.
It automatically tests the exploits on different configurations of the environment.
It is able to identify the system properties that affect the ability to exploit a vulnerability in both noiseless and noisy environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-30T18:49:18Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.