Repeat After Me: Transformers are Better than State Space Models at Copying

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01032v2
• Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 22:22:15 GMT
• Title: Repeat After Me: Transformers are Better than State Space Models at Copying
• Authors: Samy Jelassi, David Brandfonbrener, Sham M. Kakade, Eran Malach,
• Abstract summary: We show that while generalized state space models are promising in terms of inference-time efficiency, they are limited compared to transformer models on tasks that require copying from the input context.
• Score: 53.47717661441142
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Transformers are the dominant architecture for sequence modeling, but there is growing interest in models that use a fixed-size latent state that does not depend on the sequence length, which we refer to as "generalized state space models" (GSSMs). In this paper we show that while GSSMs are promising in terms of inference-time efficiency, they are limited compared to transformer models on tasks that require copying from the input context. We start with a theoretical analysis of the simple task of string copying and prove that a two layer transformer can copy strings of exponential length while GSSMs are fundamentally limited by their fixed-size latent state. Empirically, we find that transformers outperform GSSMs in terms of efficiency and generalization on synthetic tasks that require copying the context. Finally, we evaluate pretrained large language models and find that transformer models dramatically outperform state space models at copying and retrieving information from context. Taken together, these results suggest a fundamental gap between transformers and GSSMs on tasks of practical interest.

Related papers

• The Expressive Capacity of State Space Models: A Formal Language Perspective [0.8948475969696075]
  recurrent models based on linear state space models (SSMs) have shown promising performance in language modeling (LM), competititve with transformers. We present a comprehensive theoretical study of the capacity of such SSMs as it compares to that of transformers and traditional RNNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T17:46:57Z)
• MoEUT: Mixture-of-Experts Universal Transformers [75.96744719516813]
  Universal Transformers (UTs) have advantages over standard Transformers in learning compositional generalizations. Layer-sharing drastically reduces the parameter count compared to the non-shared model with the same dimensionality. No previous work has succeeded in proposing a shared-layer Transformer design that is competitive in parameter count-dominated tasks such as language modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-25T03:24:32Z)
• Do Efficient Transformers Really Save Computation? [34.15764596496696]
  We focus on the capabilities and limitations of efficient Transformers, specifically the Sparse Transformer and the Linear Transformer. Our results show that while these models are expressive enough to solve general DP tasks, contrary to expectations, they require a model size that scales with the problem size. We identify a class of DP problems for which these models can be more efficient than the standard Transformer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T17:00:56Z)
• Block-State Transformers [41.57016890030355]
  State space models (SSMs) have shown impressive results on tasks that require modeling long-range dependencies. We propose a hybrid layer named Block-State Transformer (BST) that internally combines an SSM sublayer for long-range contextualization. We show that our model outperforms similar Transformer-based architectures on language modeling perplexity and generalizes to longer sequences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T22:48:08Z)
• Mega: Moving Average Equipped Gated Attention [150.3124713793503]
  Mega is a simple, theoretically grounded, single-head gated attention mechanism equipped with (exponential) moving average. We show that Mega achieves significant improvements over other sequence models, including variants of Transformers and recent state space models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-21T20:52:17Z)
• Learning Bounded Context-Free-Grammar via LSTM and the Transformer:Difference and Explanations [51.77000472945441]
  Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Transformers are two popular neural architectures used for natural language processing tasks. In practice, it is often observed that Transformer models have better representation power than LSTM. We study such practical differences between LSTM and Transformer and propose an explanation based on their latent space decomposition patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-16T19:56:44Z)
• Long Range Arena: A Benchmark for Efficient Transformers [115.1654897514089]
  Long-rangearena benchmark is a suite of tasks consisting of sequences ranging from $1K$ to $16K$ tokens. We systematically evaluate ten well-established long-range Transformer models on our newly proposed benchmark suite.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-08T15:53:56Z)
• Applying the Transformer to Character-level Transduction [68.91664610425114]
  The transformer has been shown to outperform recurrent neural network-based sequence-to-sequence models in various word-level NLP tasks. We show that with a large enough batch size, the transformer does indeed outperform recurrent models for character-level tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-20T17:25:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.