Improving the Learning of Code Review Successive Tasks with Cross-Task
Knowledge Distillation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.02063v1
- Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2024 07:02:22 GMT
- Title: Improving the Learning of Code Review Successive Tasks with Cross-Task
Knowledge Distillation
- Authors: Oussama Ben Sghaier and Houari Sahraoui
- Abstract summary: We introduce a novel deep-learning architecture, named DISCOREV, which employs cross-task knowledge distillation to address these tasks simultaneously.
We show that our approach generates better review comments, as measured by the BLEU score, as well as more accurate code refinement according to the CodeBLEU score.
- Score: 1.0878040851638
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Code review is a fundamental process in software development that plays a
pivotal role in ensuring code quality and reducing the likelihood of errors and
bugs. However, code review can be complex, subjective, and time-consuming.
Quality estimation, comment generation, and code refinement constitute the
three key tasks of this process, and their automation has traditionally been
addressed separately in the literature using different approaches. In
particular, recent efforts have focused on fine-tuning pre-trained language
models to aid in code review tasks, with each task being considered in
isolation. We believe that these tasks are interconnected, and their
fine-tuning should consider this interconnection. In this paper, we introduce a
novel deep-learning architecture, named DISCOREV, which employs cross-task
knowledge distillation to address these tasks simultaneously. In our approach,
we utilize a cascade of models to enhance both comment generation and code
refinement models. The fine-tuning of the comment generation model is guided by
the code refinement model, while the fine-tuning of the code refinement model
is guided by the quality estimation model. We implement this guidance using two
strategies: a feedback-based learning objective and an embedding alignment
objective. We evaluate DISCOREV by comparing it to state-of-the-art methods
based on independent training and fine-tuning. Our results show that our
approach generates better review comments, as measured by the BLEU score, as
well as more accurate code refinement according to the CodeBLEU score
Related papers
- Harnessing Large Language Models for Curated Code Reviews [2.5944208050492183]
In code review, generating structured and relevant comments is crucial for identifying code issues and facilitating accurate code changes.
Existing code review datasets are often noisy and unrefined, posing limitations to the learning potential of AI models.
We propose a curation pipeline designed to enhance the quality of the largest publicly available code review dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-05T18:15:09Z) - Code Review Automation Via Multi-task Federated LLM -- An Empirical Study [4.8342038441006805]
The study explores five simple techniques for multi-task training, including two sequential methods, one parallel method, and two cumulative methods.
The results indicate that sequentially training a federated LLM (FedLLM) for our code review multi-task use case is less efficient in terms of time, computation, and performance metrics, compared to training separate models for each task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-20T08:46:46Z) - Codev-Bench: How Do LLMs Understand Developer-Centric Code Completion? [60.84912551069379]
We present the Code-Development Benchmark (Codev-Bench), a fine-grained, real-world, repository-level, and developer-centric evaluation framework.
Codev-Agent is an agent-based system that automates repository crawling, constructs execution environments, extracts dynamic calling chains from existing unit tests, and generates new test samples to avoid data leakage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-02T09:11:10Z) - QualEval: Qualitative Evaluation for Model Improvement [82.73561470966658]
We propose QualEval, which augments quantitative scalar metrics with automated qualitative evaluation as a vehicle for model improvement.
QualEval uses a powerful LLM reasoner and our novel flexible linear programming solver to generate human-readable insights.
We demonstrate that leveraging its insights, for example, improves the absolute performance of the Llama 2 model by up to 15% points relative.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-06T00:21:44Z) - Unity is Strength: Cross-Task Knowledge Distillation to Improve Code
Review Generation [0.9208007322096533]
We propose a novel deep-learning architecture, DISCOREV, based on cross-task knowledge distillation.
In our approach, the fine-tuning of the comment generation model is guided by the code refinement model.
Our results show that our approach generates better review comments as measured by the BLEU score.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-06T21:10:33Z) - ReviewRanker: A Semi-Supervised Learning Based Approach for Code Review
Quality Estimation [0.6895577977557867]
Inspection of review process effectiveness and continuous improvement can boost development productivity.
We propose a semi-supervised learning based system ReviewRanker which is aimed at assigning each code review a confidence score.
Our proposed method is trained based on simple and and well defined labels provided by developers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-08T15:37:48Z) - CodeRL: Mastering Code Generation through Pretrained Models and Deep
Reinforcement Learning [92.36705236706678]
"CodeRL" is a new framework for program synthesis tasks through pretrained LMs and deep reinforcement learning.
During inference, we introduce a new generation procedure with a critical sampling strategy.
For the model backbones, we extended the encoder-decoder architecture of CodeT5 with enhanced learning objectives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-05T02:42:15Z) - CodeReviewer: Pre-Training for Automating Code Review Activities [36.40557768557425]
This research focuses on utilizing pre-training techniques for the tasks in the code review scenario.
We collect a large-scale dataset of real world code changes and code reviews from open-source projects in nine of the most popular programming languages.
To better understand code diffs and reviews, we propose CodeReviewer, a pre-trained model that utilizes four pre-training tasks tailored specifically for the code review senario.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-17T05:40:13Z) - CodeRetriever: Unimodal and Bimodal Contrastive Learning [128.06072658302165]
We propose the CodeRetriever model, which combines the unimodal and bimodal contrastive learning to train function-level code semantic representations.
For unimodal contrastive learning, we design a semantic-guided method to build positive code pairs based on the documentation and function name.
For bimodal contrastive learning, we leverage the documentation and in-line comments of code to build text-code pairs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-26T10:54:30Z) - Visual Transformer for Task-aware Active Learning [49.903358393660724]
We present a novel pipeline for pool-based Active Learning.
Our method exploits accessible unlabelled examples during training to estimate their co-relation with the labelled examples.
Visual Transformer models non-local visual concept dependency between labelled and unlabelled examples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T17:13:59Z) - Enhancing Dialogue Generation via Multi-Level Contrastive Learning [57.005432249952406]
We propose a multi-level contrastive learning paradigm to model the fine-grained quality of the responses with respect to the query.
A Rank-aware (RC) network is designed to construct the multi-level contrastive optimization objectives.
We build a Knowledge Inference (KI) component to capture the keyword knowledge from the reference during training and exploit such information to encourage the generation of informative words.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-19T02:41:04Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.