Perceptual Video Quality Assessment: A Survey

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03413v1
• Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 16:13:52 GMT
• Title: Perceptual Video Quality Assessment: A Survey
• Authors: Xiongkuo Min, Huiyu Duan, Wei Sun, Yucheng Zhu, Guangtao Zhai
• Abstract summary: Perceptual video quality assessment plays a vital role in the field of video processing. Various subjective and objective video quality assessment studies have been conducted over the past two decades. This survey provides an up-to-date and comprehensive review of these video quality assessment studies.
• Score: 63.61214597655413
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Perceptual video quality assessment plays a vital role in the field of video processing due to the existence of quality degradations introduced in various stages of video signal acquisition, compression, transmission and display. With the advancement of internet communication and cloud service technology, video content and traffic are growing exponentially, which further emphasizes the requirement for accurate and rapid assessment of video quality. Therefore, numerous subjective and objective video quality assessment studies have been conducted over the past two decades for both generic videos and specific videos such as streaming, user-generated content (UGC), 3D, virtual and augmented reality (VR and AR), high frame rate (HFR), audio-visual, etc. This survey provides an up-to-date and comprehensive review of these video quality assessment studies. Specifically, we first review the subjective video quality assessment methodologies and databases, which are necessary for validating the performance of video quality metrics. Second, the objective video quality assessment algorithms for general purposes are surveyed and concluded according to the methodologies utilized in the quality measures. Third, we overview the objective video quality assessment measures for specific applications and emerging topics. Finally, the performances of the state-of-the-art video quality assessment measures are compared and analyzed. This survey provides a systematic overview of both classical works and recent progresses in the realm of video quality assessment, which can help other researchers quickly access the field and conduct relevant research.

Related papers

• VQA$^2$:Visual Question Answering for Video Quality Assessment [76.81110038738699]
  Video Quality Assessment originally focused on quantitative video quality scoring. It is now evolving towards more comprehensive visual quality understanding tasks. We introduce the first visual question answering instruction dataset entirely focuses on video quality assessment. We conduct extensive experiments on both video quality scoring and video quality understanding tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T09:39:52Z)
• Advancing Video Quality Assessment for AIGC [17.23281750562252]
  We propose a novel loss function that combines mean absolute error with cross-entropy loss to mitigate inter-frame quality inconsistencies. We also introduce the innovative S2CNet technique to retain critical content, while leveraging adversarial training to enhance the model's generalization capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T10:36:22Z)
• Benchmarking AIGC Video Quality Assessment: A Dataset and Unified Model [54.69882562863726]
  We try to systemically investigate the AIGC-VQA problem from both subjective and objective quality assessment perspectives. We evaluate the perceptual quality of AIGC videos from three dimensions: spatial quality, temporal quality, and text-to-video alignment. We propose a Unify Generated Video Quality assessment (UGVQ) model to comprehensively and accurately evaluate the quality of AIGC videos.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-31T07:54:26Z)
• Fréchet Video Motion Distance: A Metric for Evaluating Motion Consistency in Videos [13.368981834953981]
  We propose Fr'echet Video Motion Distance metric, which focuses on evaluating motion consistency in video generation. Specifically, we design explicit motion features based on key point tracking, and then measure the similarity between these features via the Fr'echet distance. We carry out a large-scale human study, demonstrating that our metric effectively detects temporal noise and aligns better with human perceptions of generated video quality than existing metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T02:10:50Z)
• CLIPVQA:Video Quality Assessment via CLIP [56.94085651315878]
  We propose an efficient CLIP-based Transformer method for the VQA problem ( CLIPVQA) The proposed CLIPVQA achieves new state-of-the-art VQA performance and up to 37% better generalizability than existing benchmark VQA methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-06T02:32:28Z)
• RMT-BVQA: Recurrent Memory Transformer-based Blind Video Quality Assessment for Enhanced Video Content [7.283653823423298]
  We propose a novel blind deep video quality assessment (VQA) method specifically for enhanced video content. It employs a new Recurrent Memory Transformer (RMT) based network architecture to obtain video quality representations. The extracted quality representations are then combined through linear regression to generate video-level quality indices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-14T14:01:15Z)
• Towards A Better Metric for Text-to-Video Generation [102.16250512265995]
  Generative models have demonstrated remarkable capability in synthesizing high-quality text, images, and videos. We introduce a novel evaluation pipeline, the Text-to-Video Score (T2VScore) This metric integrates two pivotal criteria: (1) Text-Video Alignment, which scrutinizes the fidelity of the video in representing the given text description, and (2) Video Quality, which evaluates the video's overall production caliber with a mixture of experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-15T15:42:39Z)
• Towards Explainable In-the-Wild Video Quality Assessment: A Database and a Language-Prompted Approach [52.07084862209754]
  We collect over two million opinions on 4,543 in-the-wild videos on 13 dimensions of quality-related factors. Specifically, we ask the subjects to label among a positive, a negative, and a neutral choice for each dimension. These explanation-level opinions allow us to measure the relationships between specific quality factors and abstract subjective quality ratings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T05:20:23Z)
• Deep Quality Assessment of Compressed Videos: A Subjective and Objective Study [23.3509109592315]
  In the video coding process, the perceived quality of a compressed video is evaluated by full-reference quality evaluation metrics. To solve this problem, it is critical to design no-reference compressed video quality assessment algorithms. In this work, a semi-automatic labeling method is adopted to build a large-scale compressed video quality database.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-07T10:50:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.