INSIDE: LLMs' Internal States Retain the Power of Hallucination Detection
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03744v2
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 04:10:50 GMT
- Title: INSIDE: LLMs' Internal States Retain the Power of Hallucination Detection
- Authors: Chao Chen, Kai Liu, Ze Chen, Yi Gu, Yue Wu, Mingyuan Tao, Zhihang Fu, Jieping Ye,
- Abstract summary: We propose to explore the dense semantic information retained within textbfINternal textbfStates for halluctextbfInation textbfDEtection.
A simple yet effective textbfEigenScore metric is proposed to better evaluate responses' self-consistency.
A test time feature clipping approach is explored to truncate extreme activations in the internal states.
- Score: 39.52923659121416
- License:
- Abstract: Knowledge hallucination have raised widespread concerns for the security and reliability of deployed LLMs. Previous efforts in detecting hallucinations have been employed at logit-level uncertainty estimation or language-level self-consistency evaluation, where the semantic information is inevitably lost during the token-decoding procedure. Thus, we propose to explore the dense semantic information retained within LLMs' \textbf{IN}ternal \textbf{S}tates for halluc\textbf{I}nation \textbf{DE}tection (\textbf{INSIDE}). In particular, a simple yet effective \textbf{EigenScore} metric is proposed to better evaluate responses' self-consistency, which exploits the eigenvalues of responses' covariance matrix to measure the semantic consistency/diversity in the dense embedding space. Furthermore, from the perspective of self-consistent hallucination detection, a test time feature clipping approach is explored to truncate extreme activations in the internal states, which reduces overconfident generations and potentially benefits the detection of overconfident hallucinations. Extensive experiments and ablation studies are performed on several popular LLMs and question-answering (QA) benchmarks, showing the effectiveness of our proposal.
Related papers
- REFIND: Retrieval-Augmented Factuality Hallucination Detection in Large Language Models [15.380441563675243]
Hallucinations in large language model (LLM) outputs severely limit their reliability in knowledge-intensive tasks such as question answering.
We introduce REFIND, a novel framework that detects hallucinated spans within LLM outputs by directly leveraging retrieved documents.
REFIND demonstrated robustness across nine languages, including low-resource settings, and significantly outperformed baseline models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-19T10:59:05Z) - HuDEx: Integrating Hallucination Detection and Explainability for Enhancing the Reliability of LLM responses [0.12499537119440242]
This paper proposes an explanation enhanced hallucination-detection model, coined as HuDEx.
The proposed model provides a novel approach to integrate detection with explanations, and enable both users and the LLM itself to understand and reduce errors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-12T04:17:02Z) - VL-Uncertainty: Detecting Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Model via Uncertainty Estimation [18.873512856021357]
We introduce VL-Uncertainty, the first uncertainty-based framework for detecting hallucinations in large vision-language models.
We measure uncertainty by analyzing the prediction variance across semantically equivalent but perturbed prompts.
When LVLMs are highly confident, they provide consistent responses to semantically equivalent queries.
But, when uncertain, the responses of the target LVLM become more random.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-18T04:06:04Z) - VALOR-EVAL: Holistic Coverage and Faithfulness Evaluation of Large Vision-Language Models [57.43276586087863]
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) suffer from hallucination issues, wherein the models generate plausible-sounding but factually incorrect outputs.
Existing benchmarks are often limited in scope, focusing mainly on object hallucinations.
We introduce a multi-dimensional benchmark covering objects, attributes, and relations, with challenging images selected based on associative biases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-22T04:49:22Z) - Retrieve Only When It Needs: Adaptive Retrieval Augmentation for Hallucination Mitigation in Large Language Models [68.91592125175787]
Hallucinations pose a significant challenge for the practical implementation of large language models (LLMs)
We present Rowen, a novel approach that enhances LLMs with a selective retrieval augmentation process tailored to address hallucinations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-16T11:55:40Z) - Knowledge Verification to Nip Hallucination in the Bud [69.79051730580014]
We demonstrate the feasibility of mitigating hallucinations by verifying and minimizing the inconsistency between external knowledge present in the alignment data and the intrinsic knowledge embedded within foundation LLMs.
We propose a novel approach called Knowledge Consistent Alignment (KCA), which employs a well-aligned LLM to automatically formulate assessments based on external knowledge.
We demonstrate the superior efficacy of KCA in reducing hallucinations across six benchmarks, utilizing foundation LLMs of varying backbones and scales.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-19T15:39:49Z) - Enhancing Uncertainty-Based Hallucination Detection with Stronger Focus [99.33091772494751]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained significant popularity for their impressive performance across diverse fields.
LLMs are prone to hallucinate untruthful or nonsensical outputs that fail to meet user expectations.
We propose a novel reference-free, uncertainty-based method for detecting hallucinations in LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-22T08:39:17Z) - A New Benchmark and Reverse Validation Method for Passage-level
Hallucination Detection [63.56136319976554]
Large Language Models (LLMs) generate hallucinations, which can cause significant damage when deployed for mission-critical tasks.
We propose a self-check approach based on reverse validation to detect factual errors automatically in a zero-resource fashion.
We empirically evaluate our method and existing zero-resource detection methods on two datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-10T10:14:59Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.